<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox Says No to Obama 100 Day Stunt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Here and There</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1043855</link>
		<dc:creator>Here and There</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1043855</guid>
		<description>[...] Drum independently draws the same conclusions I do re: the reasonableness of networks&#8217; complaints about Obama&#8217;s all-too-frequent prime time press [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drum independently draws the same conclusions I do re: the reasonableness of networks&#8217; complaints about Obama&#8217;s all-too-frequent prime time press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here and There</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1043856</link>
		<dc:creator>Here and There</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1043856</guid>
		<description>[...] Drum independently draws the same conclusions I do re: the reasonableness of networks&#8217; complaints about Obama&#8217;s all-too-frequent prime time press [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drum independently draws the same conclusions I do re: the reasonableness of networks&#8217; complaints about Obama&#8217;s all-too-frequent prime time press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1040238</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1040238</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On Wednesday he personally threatened and abused an American citizen lawyer that he would use the White House press corps to drag his clients &quot;through the mud&quot; UNLESS he bowed his knee to HIM and dropped his clients&#039; lawful opposition to King Obama&#039;s contract breaking thuggery.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why don&#039;t you seek out the president and make a citizen&#039;s arrest to combat this horrible &quot;thuggery&quot;...a grateful nation will thank you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On Wednesday he personally threatened and abused an American citizen lawyer that he would use the White House press corps to drag his clients "through the mud" UNLESS he bowed his knee to HIM and dropped his clients' lawful opposition to King Obama's contract breaking thuggery.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why don't you seek out the president and make a citizen's arrest to combat this horrible "thuggery"...a grateful nation will thank you...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1040214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1040214</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah -- Obama defenders. 

Let&#039;s find out what you think about the mob activity and utter arrogance of the President of the United States.

On Wednesday he personally threatened and abused an American citizen lawyer that he would use the White House press corps to drag his clients &quot;through the mud&quot; UNLESS he bowed his knee to HIM and dropped his clients&#039; lawful opposition to King Obama&#039;s contract breaking thuggery.

You know -- like Obama kow-tow bowed to the King of Saaudi Arabia. Like all bullies, he bows to a bigger bully.

This administration is filled with thugs and shysters. And Barack Obama is top of the heap with the Press Corps as his fawning court.

It&#039;s disgusting and Banana Republic-like, even J.Crew like -- and we have cult creeps like An Uninteresting Party defending this jerk, and lecturing us on what &quot;conservatives&quot; need to do. Screw you.

Anyone who is interested in hearing a first hand account of how Thugbama operates behind closed doors, listen up, listen uppers...

http://www.760wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&amp;spid=6525</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah -- Obama defenders. </p>
<p>Let's find out what you think about the mob activity and utter arrogance of the President of the United States.</p>
<p>On Wednesday he personally threatened and abused an American citizen lawyer that he would use the White House press corps to drag his clients "through the mud" UNLESS he bowed his knee to HIM and dropped his clients' lawful opposition to King Obama's contract breaking thuggery.</p>
<p>You know -- like Obama kow-tow bowed to the King of Saaudi Arabia. Like all bullies, he bows to a bigger bully.</p>
<p>This administration is filled with thugs and shysters. And Barack Obama is top of the heap with the Press Corps as his fawning court.</p>
<p>It's disgusting and Banana Republic-like, even J.Crew like -- and we have cult creeps like An Uninteresting Party defending this jerk, and lecturing us on what "conservatives" need to do. Screw you.</p>
<p>Anyone who is interested in hearing a first hand account of how Thugbama operates behind closed doors, listen up, listen uppers...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.760wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&amp;spid=6525" rel="nofollow">http://www.760wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&amp;spid=6525</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1040090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1040090</guid>
		<description>A Uninterested Party -- clearly an Obama cult who hasn&#039;t the guts to admit it. Come on doofus, admit  who you support and why. Why so shy?

Nah -- you haven&#039;t the guts. Too busy lying as you pretend to be all so concerned about &quot;conservatives.&quot; 

What a brain dead cult you are. What are you (hehehehe, as you so childishly write) like 16 years old? 

How about trying to make at least a semi-cogent case against conservatism (in favor of big government stateism, perhaps as that&#039;s what you support), instead of a puerile, pathetic exhibition of non-joined-up thinking.

Come on, write something vaguely adult (hehehehe, as you so childishly write. Is that another example of your humor, or sarcasm, which is, as we all know, the lowest form of the half-wit.)

Oh -- and Michael. Please give us YOUR definition of &quot;criticize,&quot; I&#039;m dying to know. Well not really, as you instantly sound like a man who can&#039;t see a point without missing it by a mile. Though you may care to expand of a rather pointless post and prove me incorrect on my first impression.

Until you share your erudition I&#039;ll rely on my OED which states &quot;indicate the faults of someone (or something) in a disapproving way.

I do believe my few posts here fall into that category regarding generalized critical observations of the first full on Marxist President.

Maybe you are mistaking &quot;criticize&quot; for &quot;critique&quot; which is a much more detailed analysis of a subject. Internet posts in response to short articles and other posts, by their very nature can only deal with broad strokes.

Maybe you think the word means something different to the actual definition. But I think you did get my drift, that suddenly it unpatriotic to criticize a President -- not simply his policies but the man himself. That&#039;s a CULT my friend -- and ... ahem, rather un-American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Uninterested Party -- clearly an Obama cult who hasn't the guts to admit it. Come on doofus, admit  who you support and why. Why so shy?</p>
<p>Nah -- you haven't the guts. Too busy lying as you pretend to be all so concerned about "conservatives." </p>
<p>What a brain dead cult you are. What are you (hehehehe, as you so childishly write) like 16 years old? </p>
<p>How about trying to make at least a semi-cogent case against conservatism (in favor of big government stateism, perhaps as that's what you support), instead of a puerile, pathetic exhibition of non-joined-up thinking.</p>
<p>Come on, write something vaguely adult (hehehehe, as you so childishly write. Is that another example of your humor, or sarcasm, which is, as we all know, the lowest form of the half-wit.)</p>
<p>Oh -- and Michael. Please give us YOUR definition of "criticize," I'm dying to know. Well not really, as you instantly sound like a man who can't see a point without missing it by a mile. Though you may care to expand of a rather pointless post and prove me incorrect on my first impression.</p>
<p>Until you share your erudition I'll rely on my OED which states "indicate the faults of someone (or something) in a disapproving way.</p>
<p>I do believe my few posts here fall into that category regarding generalized critical observations of the first full on Marxist President.</p>
<p>Maybe you are mistaking "criticize" for "critique" which is a much more detailed analysis of a subject. Internet posts in response to short articles and other posts, by their very nature can only deal with broad strokes.</p>
<p>Maybe you think the word means something different to the actual definition. But I think you did get my drift, that suddenly it unpatriotic to criticize a President -- not simply his policies but the man himself. That's a CULT my friend -- and ... ahem, rather un-American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1039418</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1039418</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I remember that &quot;WE ARE AMERICANS AND WE HAVE A RIGHT... A RIGHT TO &lt;strong&gt;CRITICIZE&lt;/strong&gt; ANY PRESIDENT...&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t think that word means what you think it means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I remember that "WE ARE AMERICANS AND WE HAVE A RIGHT... A RIGHT TO <strong>CRITICIZE</strong> ANY PRESIDENT..." </p></blockquote>
<p>I don't think that word means what you think it means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1039349</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1039349</guid>
		<description>Hehehe...you continue to provide humor, I thank you for that...the fact that you call me a &quot;cultist&quot; for Obama based solely on the fact that I disagree with your view of him shows how stupid you are...you have no clue how I feel about him apart from my disagreement with your ranting characterizations...oh, and the fact that I had to explain my sarcasm further confirms how foolish you are...keep foaming at the mouth though...it&#039;s fun to watch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehe...you continue to provide humor, I thank you for that...the fact that you call me a "cultist" for Obama based solely on the fact that I disagree with your view of him shows how stupid you are...you have no clue how I feel about him apart from my disagreement with your ranting characterizations...oh, and the fact that I had to explain my sarcasm further confirms how foolish you are...keep foaming at the mouth though...it's fun to watch...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1039277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1039277</guid>
		<description>An Uninteresting Party

Again... go stick your braindead claptrap.

Conservatives don&#039;t need lectures from an Obama cult who thinks it&#039;s his job to lick the arse of the least equipped, most arrogant, not too bright man ever to hold the office.

I understand that it really infuriates cults when the dear dumb leader is called out on his actual political &quot;philosophy&quot;, and exposed for what he truly is. That&#039;s so Banana Republic, so Hugobama, so Maobama.

I&#039;ll repeat: Barack Obama is a thin skinned, get even Marxist. All his life he&#039;s been part of a claque which has ensured he has been inculcated with the most virulent, disgusting amoral political philosophy ever conceived. Except the part where he details how he was a coked out druggie. That was more bong than Buhkarin.

I&#039;m guessing you&#039;re a &quot;progressive.&quot; A term which goes back to the racist President Woodrow Wilson, 1914-21 (America&#039;s first quasi-socialist President who also segregated the by-then largely integrated US military.)

That makes you really a regressive as “Progressive” is Marxist code for the cult of a reactionary, regressive political movement best described as COLLECTIVIST TOTALITARIANISM of varying pinkist to red hues: from the soft tyranny of the control freak Stateist; to the tyrannical dictatorship supporting the cult of the great leader.

No matter, they all depend on one thing: sublimating individualism to that of all powerful state. You love that doncha boy?

These ideas are at least 200 years old. Communism, socialism, fascism, Marxism, welfare stateism, National Socialism, Nazism. 

Been there, done that, nothing new to see here. You can&#039;t make an omlet without murdering tens of millions.

And no, I&#039;m not saying Obama has murder on his mind. Though plenty of his false idoler do, as explefied by people who get all bent out of shape when dissenters mock the doofus. Like you. Ah I so remember when dissent was patriotic. Lo those long six months ago. 

I remember that &quot;WE ARE AMERICANS AND WE HAVE A RIGHT... A RIGHT TO CRITICIZE ANY PRESIDENT...&quot; (Hillary Shriek Clinton, 2003) 

All I can say is that you ricly deserve Obama&#039;s Fannie Mae Socialized Healthcare System planned for America. How very progressive of you.

Oh -- and when you have to &quot;explain&quot; sarcasm (sic) it&#039;s like when you have to explain a gag. Not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Uninteresting Party</p>
<p>Again... go stick your braindead claptrap.</p>
<p>Conservatives don't need lectures from an Obama cult who thinks it's his job to lick the arse of the least equipped, most arrogant, not too bright man ever to hold the office.</p>
<p>I understand that it really infuriates cults when the dear dumb leader is called out on his actual political "philosophy", and exposed for what he truly is. That's so Banana Republic, so Hugobama, so Maobama.</p>
<p>I'll repeat: Barack Obama is a thin skinned, get even Marxist. All his life he's been part of a claque which has ensured he has been inculcated with the most virulent, disgusting amoral political philosophy ever conceived. Except the part where he details how he was a coked out druggie. That was more bong than Buhkarin.</p>
<p>I'm guessing you're a "progressive." A term which goes back to the racist President Woodrow Wilson, 1914-21 (America's first quasi-socialist President who also segregated the by-then largely integrated US military.)</p>
<p>That makes you really a regressive as “Progressive” is Marxist code for the cult of a reactionary, regressive political movement best described as COLLECTIVIST TOTALITARIANISM of varying pinkist to red hues: from the soft tyranny of the control freak Stateist; to the tyrannical dictatorship supporting the cult of the great leader.</p>
<p>No matter, they all depend on one thing: sublimating individualism to that of all powerful state. You love that doncha boy?</p>
<p>These ideas are at least 200 years old. Communism, socialism, fascism, Marxism, welfare stateism, National Socialism, Nazism. </p>
<p>Been there, done that, nothing new to see here. You can't make an omlet without murdering tens of millions.</p>
<p>And no, I'm not saying Obama has murder on his mind. Though plenty of his false idoler do, as explefied by people who get all bent out of shape when dissenters mock the doofus. Like you. Ah I so remember when dissent was patriotic. Lo those long six months ago. </p>
<p>I remember that "WE ARE AMERICANS AND WE HAVE A RIGHT... A RIGHT TO CRITICIZE ANY PRESIDENT..." (Hillary Shriek Clinton, 2003) </p>
<p>All I can say is that you ricly deserve Obama's Fannie Mae Socialized Healthcare System planned for America. How very progressive of you.</p>
<p>Oh -- and when you have to "explain" sarcasm (sic) it's like when you have to explain a gag. Not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1038843</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1038843</guid>
		<description>Hahahahahaha...umm, challenging a president of the opposing party is just fine for the minority party...but if ass-clowns like you go around claiming that the president is &quot;radically offensive&quot; and a &quot;half-educated totalitarian collectivist&quot; and is nothing more than &quot;a not too bright, self-confessed druggie student who somehow got into Columbia and Harvard&quot; I sincerely hope that the GOP would adopt such attitudes and rhetoric, as it will guarantee that they will remain in the minority for a very long time...hence my sarcasm that you (or, to clarify, someone like you) would run for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012...you&#039;re not only offensive, but you&#039;re also irrelevant...let&#039;s hope the GOP follows your lead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahahaha...umm, challenging a president of the opposing party is just fine for the minority party...but if ass-clowns like you go around claiming that the president is "radically offensive" and a "half-educated totalitarian collectivist" and is nothing more than "a not too bright, self-confessed druggie student who somehow got into Columbia and Harvard" I sincerely hope that the GOP would adopt such attitudes and rhetoric, as it will guarantee that they will remain in the minority for a very long time...hence my sarcasm that you (or, to clarify, someone like you) would run for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012...you're not only offensive, but you're also irrelevant...let's hope the GOP follows your lead...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1038745</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1038745</guid>
		<description>re: An Uninteresting Party.

Thanks for the shite advice. But stick it.

Though I am at a loss to follow what passes for your &quot;logic&quot; on two fronts...

#1 Opposing the most radically offensive  &quot;Democrat&quot; (sic) President is what&#039;s wrong with the &quot;Republican&quot; Party. Talk about defining dumb down. How long did it take you to come up with that moronic conclusion?

I know it&#039;s beyond the intellect of a Cultist like your bad self to grasp the idea of &quot;dissent&quot; and &quot;opposition.&quot; Clue: it&#039;s what political parties do when some neo-commie clown plans to &quot;remake&quot; America in his own arrogant image.

Maybe you should read a few books on the foundation of free markets and free political discourse, liberty, conservative stuff like that. Try Smith, Locke, Churchill, Friedman, et al to understand why conservatives and capitalists despise the reactionary garbage peddled by a half-educated totalitarian collectivist called Barack Obama, a not too bright, self-confessed druggie student who somehow got into Columbia and Harvard.

#2. You then leap to a surreal scenario where I will be running for President. Let me guess, you&#039;d like that other dimwit, John McCain to run again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: An Uninteresting Party.</p>
<p>Thanks for the shite advice. But stick it.</p>
<p>Though I am at a loss to follow what passes for your "logic" on two fronts...</p>
<p>#1 Opposing the most radically offensive  "Democrat" (sic) President is what's wrong with the "Republican" Party. Talk about defining dumb down. How long did it take you to come up with that moronic conclusion?</p>
<p>I know it's beyond the intellect of a Cultist like your bad self to grasp the idea of "dissent" and "opposition." Clue: it's what political parties do when some neo-commie clown plans to "remake" America in his own arrogant image.</p>
<p>Maybe you should read a few books on the foundation of free markets and free political discourse, liberty, conservative stuff like that. Try Smith, Locke, Churchill, Friedman, et al to understand why conservatives and capitalists despise the reactionary garbage peddled by a half-educated totalitarian collectivist called Barack Obama, a not too bright, self-confessed druggie student who somehow got into Columbia and Harvard.</p>
<p>#2. You then leap to a surreal scenario where I will be running for President. Let me guess, you'd like that other dimwit, John McCain to run again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1038001</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1038001</guid>
		<description>re: Jack Bauer at April 29, 2009 07:17

A perfect example of why the GOP is such a sorry ass disaster right now...hopefully this person will run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Jack Bauer at April 29, 2009 07:17</p>
<p>A perfect example of why the GOP is such a sorry ass disaster right now...hopefully this person will run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1037716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1037716</guid>
		<description>You know what OUR PAUL... eff President Obama and the Marxist horse he road into town on. 

But please feel free to OD on the dumbest most narcissistic man to ever hold the office. I guess you&#039;re not &quot;listening carefully&quot; enough. I order you to do so pronto.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if this Eva Peron actually tried to use Airforce One for publicity shots, all at the taxpayers expense.

As yet, it still isn&#039;t s criminal offense to insult the dear dumb leader, as happens in the typical banana republic this doofus is intent on turning the constitutional republic. But give it time, I know it really offends a cult&lt;em&gt;ist&lt;/em&gt; like you.

Your knees and lips must be really sore after a 100 days though. Listen up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what OUR PAUL... eff President Obama and the Marxist horse he road into town on. </p>
<p>But please feel free to OD on the dumbest most narcissistic man to ever hold the office. I guess you're not "listening carefully" enough. I order you to do so pronto.</p>
<p>I wouldn't be surprised if this Eva Peron actually tried to use Airforce One for publicity shots, all at the taxpayers expense.</p>
<p>As yet, it still isn't s criminal offense to insult the dear dumb leader, as happens in the typical banana republic this doofus is intent on turning the constitutional republic. But give it time, I know it really offends a cult<em>ist</em> like you.</p>
<p>Your knees and lips must be really sore after a 100 days though. Listen up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1037704</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1037704</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I mean, a talent like Glenn Beck does not come cheap, and surely Greta Van Susteren’s ability to deliver a well turned phrase with an impeccable Valley Girl Accent and with an up curled lip, no matter what vowel is called for, is a gift to the American public that is not paid from petty cash. I shant mention the other Fox star personalities, for surely they are better known to you and &lt;strong&gt;Michael&lt;/strong&gt;, than they are to me…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Once again, you&#039;re confusing Fox News -- which IS running the press conference -- with the Fox broadcast network (Simpsons, 24, etc.) which is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I mean, a talent like Glenn Beck does not come cheap, and surely Greta Van Susteren&rsquo;s ability to deliver a well turned phrase with an impeccable Valley Girl Accent and with an up curled lip, no matter what vowel is called for, is a gift to the American public that is not paid from petty cash. I shant mention the other Fox star personalities, for surely they are better known to you and <strong>Michael</strong>, than they are to me…</p></blockquote>
<p>Once again, you're confusing Fox News -- which IS running the press conference -- with the Fox broadcast network (Simpsons, 24, etc.) which is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1037499</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1037499</guid>
		<description>Did not mean to get you all riled up &lt;strong&gt;James&lt;/strong&gt; (commentary on April 28, 2009, 09:57 am), certainly rabbit ears Fox can decide not to broadcast Obama’s address and leave it to its cable outlets. Its responsibility is not to its viewers, but to Rupert Murdoch treasure chest.

I mean, a talent like Glenn Beck does not come cheap, and surely Greta Van Susteren’s ability to deliver a well turned phrase with an impeccable Valley Girl Accent and with an up curled lip, no matter what vowel is called for, is a gift to the American public that is not paid from petty cash. I shant mention the other Fox star personalities, for surely they are better known to you and &lt;strong&gt;Michael&lt;/strong&gt;, than they are to me…

Take heart, it has only been 100 days. It will take time to adjust to the fact that in a functioning Democracy it is expected for the populace to know what the government is up to. Surely an address by the President might accomplish this desired goal, for if nothing else it will give those who claim he is &lt;strong&gt;yapping&lt;/strong&gt;, a framework to voice their dissatisfaction.

With that thought in mind, listen to Obama carefully, and tell us where you disagree…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did not mean to get you all riled up <strong>James</strong> (commentary on April 28, 2009, 09:57 am), certainly rabbit ears Fox can decide not to broadcast Obama&rsquo;s address and leave it to its cable outlets. Its responsibility is not to its viewers, but to Rupert Murdoch treasure chest.</p>
<p>I mean, a talent like Glenn Beck does not come cheap, and surely Greta Van Susteren&rsquo;s ability to deliver a well turned phrase with an impeccable Valley Girl Accent and with an up curled lip, no matter what vowel is called for, is a gift to the American public that is not paid from petty cash. I shant mention the other Fox star personalities, for surely they are better known to you and <strong>Michael</strong>, than they are to me…</p>
<p>Take heart, it has only been 100 days. It will take time to adjust to the fact that in a functioning Democracy it is expected for the populace to know what the government is up to. Surely an address by the President might accomplish this desired goal, for if nothing else it will give those who claim he is <strong>yapping</strong>, a framework to voice their dissatisfaction.</p>
<p>With that thought in mind, listen to Obama carefully, and tell us where you disagree…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/fox_says_no_to_obama_100_day_stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-1037372</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=35473#comment-1037372</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I wish all the networks would drop the press conference - cable news and network. There&#039;s about a million of these press conferences to come, and anything of significance that comes out of one will just be reported in the press anyways later on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I wish all the networks would drop the press conference - cable news and network. There's about a million of these press conferences to come, and anything of significance that comes out of one will just be reported in the press anyways later on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
