working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Fred Thompson’s Appeal

Robert McHenry argues that Fred Thompson has so many people clamoring for him to join an already-crowded field precisely because he seems not all that excited by the prospect of running for president. Steve Bainbridge agrees and observes that, “The idea of a guy with a life, who once said that ‘After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood,’ and seemed to actually mean it, makes an attractive change from the rest of the crowd.”

There’s a lot to that, of course. Also, Thompson combines the freshness of Barack Obama, in the sense of being largely unknown on the national stage, and the “straight shooter” quality John McCain seemed to have in 2000. People long for those things. As a campaign gets further along, however, candidates are forced to get more specific and to therefore alienate some people. Everybody likes a guy who “tells it like it is,” so long as they agree with them; otherwise, they’re just blowhards.

I would also note that it wasn’t all that long ago that we had a rising star politician with a macho swagger who was not a lifetime politician and who seemed content enough with his life that losing an election wouldn’t have bothered him all that much. In fact, we elected him president six and a half years ago.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

Well written James, I couldn't have said it better myself (not that that is saying much). The only point I would pick on is that Fred Thompson is already more familiar with the workings of politics in DC than GW was before he became president. I would like to think that GW wasn't as prepared as he needed to be for the back-stabbing politics that helped drag him down, whereas I think Thompson is already a master of all that.

Posted by Patrick McGuire | May 21, 2007 | 04:12 pm | Permalink
 

was not a lifetime politician

Huh? I guess it depends how you define "lifetime." He was a two-term governor, a House candidate, worked on two presidential campaigns. When he wasn't working in politics he was exploiting the connections he generated from having been from a political family.

His Rangers tenure was also pretty explicitly done in anticipation for running for the governorship.

Posted by Triumph | May 21, 2007 | 04:24 pm | Permalink
 

Triumph,

W may have decided at about the age of 40 to go into politics, but it should be clear that there was a significant part of his life that was not interested in running for office.

Those with more presidential trivia knowledge than me can probably point to people with less time in politics than W who made it to be president (generals excepted), but I doubt there are many.

Posted by yetanotherjohn | May 21, 2007 | 04:33 pm | Permalink
 

I hope both Thompson and Gore decide to get in the race. And I rather hope both of them get thier respective party nominations.

Posted by Tlaloc | May 21, 2007 | 04:46 pm | Permalink
 

I hope both Thompson and Gore decide to get in the race. And I rather hope both of them get thier respective party nominations.

If that happens, I have 50-1 that Fred wins Tennessee...

Posted by Mark | May 21, 2007 | 05:00 pm | Permalink
 

"I would like to think that GW wasn't as prepared as he needed to be for the back-stabbing politics that helped drag him down, whereas I think Thompson is already a master of all that."

Spare me. The only thing that has dragged GWB down is GWB. The day that citizens such as yourself once again grasp reality and start to care more for America than for GWB and the GOP then perhaps you will gain your majority back. GWB was always a study in mediocrity. Without the Bush name he would have been lucky to top out as a successful insurance agent.
Sorry, I know you would like to think that there was some evil left wing conspiracy that was the catalyst for his fall, but you know the left, they aren't that organized.

Posted by All Man | May 21, 2007 | 05:12 pm | Permalink
 

Everybody likes a guy who “tells it like it is,” so long as they agree with them; otherwise, they’re just blowhards.

That one goes in the quote book.

Posted by Kent G. Budge | May 21, 2007 | 05:59 pm | Permalink
 

Thompson/Hunter
The ticket to beat Clinton/Obama with.

Posted by boaz | May 21, 2007 | 08:17 pm | Permalink
 

W may have decided at about the age of 40 to go into politics, but it should be clear that there was a significant part of his life that was not interested in running for office.

It is true that Bush was a drunk and coke-head until he was 40--but I was counting that as an extended adolesence. Although, given Bush's limited rational capacities I guess his presidency could still be marked by an extended puerility.

Posted by Triumph | May 21, 2007 | 10:08 pm | Permalink
 

In fact, we elected him president six and a half years ago.

And look how well that went.

Posted by carpeicthus | May 22, 2007 | 12:05 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.