French Surrendering in Afghanistan?
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, March 10, 2009 |
French defense minister Bernard Kouchner said yesterday that “We should accept the result of the forthcoming elections whatever it is,” adding, “If nationalist-minded Taliban come to power through the ballot-box and respect the constitution, that is the Afghans’ business.”
To be sure, he added an important caveat: “What we reject is support for international jihad.” Still, as I ask in my New Atlanticist essay “Afghanistan: Time to Give Up?,” “If the Taliban’s return to power is an acceptable outcome, what the hell have our forces been fighting and dying for these past seven years?”
Even the American general in charge of ISAF, David McKiernan, acknowledges that we’re “not winning” over there right now. But are we really prepared to simply give up and go home?
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- French Surrendering in Afghanistan?
- Why McKiernan Was Replaced
- Afghanistan Commander Replaced (Updated)
- McKiernan: ‘Glass Half Full’ in Afghanistan
- VP Debate: Afghanistan Surge?
- The NYT on NATO’s Mission
- The Debate on Afghanistan
- Bush Pauses Iraq Troop Cutbacks, Shortens Deployments
- Drug War Logic
- Voting Can Be Hazardous to Your Health
- Abbas: Palestinian Authority May Disband
- Jodi Rell Not Running
- Caption Contest Winners
- OTB Latenight – Styx
- Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later
- Oklahoma High Schoolers Are Very Familiar With George Washington, Thanks
- Was Fort Hood Massacre ‘Terrorism’?
- Making Jobs More Expensive
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
Would you similarly view an electoral victory by the Baath party in Iraq to be a failure of everything we've worked for there?
Would you similarly view an electoral victory by the Baath party in Iraq to be a failure of everything we've worked for there?
If it were going to govern by extreme rules of sharia and not observe human rights in any meaningful sense, absolutely.
If the Nazis were still running Germany after WWII, I'd call that failure, too, in case you were wondering. Ditto if the British royal family maintained sovereignty of the USA after the War for Independence.
If it were going to govern by extreme rules of sharia and not observe human rights in any meaningful sense, absolutely.
Not exactly tenets of the Baath party. But anyway, I just wanted clarification as to whether you were opposed to the Taliban party, or the former Taliban party's methods of governing, and I got that.
