working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

FTC HOTLINE

Not surprisingly, the Federal ‘Do Not Call’ registry was swamped yesterday as 735,000 phone numbers were registered. Starting in October, telemarketers can be fined $11,000 for each number on the list they call. Of course, the politicians protected themselves:

The new list applies to most businesses but does not affect solicitations from political organizations, charities, surveys or insurance companies.

Also, companies retain the right to contact customers for up to 18 months after their last transaction, or up to three months after a request for information or the submission of an application. However, by law, individual companies must heed any consumer’s request to stop calling.

Certainly, better than nothing, but a lot of loopholes. A national opt-in list would be much more preferable. And, while I understand polling and political calls, the rational basis for excluding insurance salesmen escapes me.

The telemarketing industry is filing lawsuits, presumably on 1st Amendment grounds, and claims that two million jobs could be lost. I would think the 1st Amendment claim would be shot down, but, as we found out yet again this week, there’s no predicting how Supreme Court justices will read the Constitution. Clearly, no right to intrude into the homes of others is included in the Bill of Rights.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
Tags | US Politics
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

A more legit question is whether this is really a federal power in the first place.

Posted by Steven | June 28, 2003 | 09:23 am | Permalink
 

True 'nuff. I guess it's reasonable enough as an interpretation of interstate commerce. Regulation of telephone traffic has been a federal responsibility from the get-go, really.

Posted by James Joyner | June 28, 2003 | 11:05 am | Permalink
 

You make a point with the Commerce Clause, so I am off base. Still, as annoying as telemarketers are, it seems a fairly small and petty thing for the Congress and the President to be dealing with.

Posted by Steven | June 28, 2003 | 12:20 pm | Permalink
 

Hard to argue with you there. I guess, along with spam, it's one of the top annoyances out there. Sort of a reverse collective action problem--things that annoy 99% of the population get more attention than really important things that affect 15%.

---

Posted by James Joyner | June 28, 2003 | 12:33 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.