<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GAY RAPE, REDUX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_rape_redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_rape_redux/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:46:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_rape_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2192#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>I am with you--an Equal Protection argument makes more sense than a Due Process one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you--an Equal Protection argument makes more sense than a Due Process one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_rape_redux/comment-page-1/#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2192#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>James, 

You are very correct. I guess we chalk it up to one more piece of disjointed thinking by the Supremes.

Regardless if wether you agree with the ruling or don&#039;t, clearly it is bad law.

Paul



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, </p>
<p>You are very correct. I guess we chalk it up to one more piece of disjointed thinking by the Supremes.</p>
<p>Regardless if wether you agree with the ruling or don't, clearly it is bad law.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
