<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Sex Charges Hot Political Tactic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101172</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101172</guid>
		<description>James, what r u talking about???

This was a vote!  &quot;Strickland did not vote for a resolution condemning sex between adults and children&quot;

Why in the world would he or anyone not vote for it?  OMG!  This isn&#039;t right or left, R or D, liberal or conservative.  It&#039;s common sense to vote against an O-R-G-A-N-I-Z-A-T-I-O-N who has a despicable criminal agenda-one that goes against any definition of modern human morality.  Tell me what good reason (besides the BS he gave) for NOT voting against it.  Tell me please James what you would view as a good reason.  

I haven&#039;t studied that political race deeply and can&#039;t tell u who the best man for the job is, but based on just the NAMBLA issue, I would say it would be reprehensible for Strickland to be elected dog catcher, let alone the US Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, what r u talking about???</p>
<p>This was a vote!  "Strickland did not vote for a resolution condemning sex between adults and children"</p>
<p>Why in the world would he or anyone not vote for it?  OMG!  This isn't right or left, R or D, liberal or conservative.  It's common sense to vote against an O-R-G-A-N-I-Z-A-T-I-O-N who has a despicable criminal agenda-one that goes against any definition of modern human morality.  Tell me what good reason (besides the BS he gave) for NOT voting against it.  Tell me please James what you would view as a good reason.  </p>
<p>I haven't studied that political race deeply and can't tell u who the best man for the job is, but based on just the NAMBLA issue, I would say it would be reprehensible for Strickland to be elected dog catcher, let alone the US Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101159</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101159</guid>
		<description>Christopher:  There&#039;s ZERO evidence Strickland supports NAMBLA.  He didn&#039;t vote for a meaningless resolution and NAMBLA praised him for it.  That&#039;s hardly the same thing.  For all I know, the KKK endorsed Blackwell for his stance on affirmative action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher:  There's ZERO evidence Strickland supports NAMBLA.  He didn't vote for a meaningless resolution and NAMBLA praised him for it.  That's hardly the same thing.  For all I know, the KKK endorsed Blackwell for his stance on affirmative action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101156</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101156</guid>
		<description>Blackwell is correct.  Strickland is a scumbag.  Support for NAMBLA?  That is SICK!!!!!!!!!  Why why why would he support that gross org.?  WHY?  Hmmmm.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackwell is correct.  Strickland is a scumbag.  Support for NAMBLA?  That is SICK!!!!!!!!!  Why why why would he support that gross org.?  WHY?  Hmmmm.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Disgraceful Lefty Tactics</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101111</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Disgraceful Lefty Tactics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101111</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside The Beltway [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside The Beltway [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101099</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101099</guid>
		<description>Pug, please quote the speech in which George W. Bush stated are pro terrorists.  A link will do, or a date and time of speech.  If you cannot do so, you will forever be known as the liar you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pug, please quote the speech in which George W. Bush stated are pro terrorists.  A link will do, or a date and time of speech.  If you cannot do so, you will forever be known as the liar you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101085</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101085</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the pro-pedophilia charge is so bad.  Republicans from G.W. Bush on down accuse Democrats of being pro-terrorist all the time.  It&#039;s what they&#039;ve been running on since 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't understand why the pro-pedophilia charge is so bad.  Republicans from G.W. Bush on down accuse Democrats of being pro-terrorist all the time.  It's what they've been running on since 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101083</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101083</guid>
		<description>Well at least Blackwell will be gone in a couple weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least Blackwell will be gone in a couple weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101070</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101070</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The &#8216;outting&#8217; of Republican Senator Larry Craig...&lt;/strong&gt;

The big story in the blogosphere today is the &#8216;outting&#8217; of Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) by outting specialist Mike Rogers, a despicable individual who has a history of outting supposedly closeted homosexuals.
First things first, I don&#8217;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The &#8216;outting&#8217; of Republican Senator Larry Craig...</strong></p>
<p>The big story in the blogosphere today is the &#8216;outting&#8217; of Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) by outting specialist Mike Rogers, a despicable individual who has a history of outting supposedly closeted homosexuals.<br />
First things first, I don&#8217;t...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-101062</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gay_sex_charges_hot_political_tactic/#comment-101062</guid>
		<description>Wait till Blackwell decides his opponent is ineligible and removes him from the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait till Blackwell decides his opponent is ineligible and removes him from the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
