George Allen for President
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, February 5, 2008 |
Richard Viguerie, the pioneer of the direct mail fundraising approach and a guiding force in Republican politics since the 1970s, has been campaigning at least since this time last year for the nomination of a Reagan style conservative. He was going around the halls at last year’s CPAC convention lamenting the ways in which “Rudy McRomney” fell short of that ideal and has been sending mass emails ever since.
He briefly backed Fred Thompson but, alas, that dog couldn’t get up early enough in the morning to hunt. He then backed Ron Paul but, alas, he doesn’t appeal to Republicans — a distinct disadvantage in Republican primaries — and, as Viguerie himself admits, “most conservatives want a powerful U.S. presence in world affairs and will never support Paul’s defense and foreign policy.”
He believes there’s still time to beat back the tide that seems to have John McCain winning the nomination with Mitt Romney as the only plausible alternative. But who?
Former Virginia Governor and Senator George Allen was considered a frontrunner for this year’s GOP nomination before he lost his reelection campaign in 2006. But his loss can be chalked up to his mishandling of charges of racism and to voter resentment toward the Iraq War, and to the fact that Democrats, desperate to win the Senate, swallowed hard and nominated a former Reagan Administration official to run against him. If losing one’s previous statewide campaign disqualified a person from being president, neither Lincoln nor Nixon nor the elder Bush would have won.
Of course, many would argue that the latter two shouldn’t have won. And the election of the first resulted in a war that pitted brother against brother which killed over half a million Americans.
But, still, their victories do demonstrate that it’s possible to make a comeback. Of course, it helps to serve two terms as vice president under popular presidents, as Nixon and Bush did, or to have an election pitting four major candidates against one another, as Lincoln did. Not to mention having avoided the reputation as a yahoo.
He also puts forth Senator Jim DeMint or Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina as possible alternatives. That neither has any national name recognition, organization, or cash on hand does pose a minor obstacle to each, however.
Or the fact that the nomination may well be all but wrapped up by tonight.
Photo credit: Raising Kaine via Google. Yes, it’s from a movie.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- George Allen for President
- Carville: Jeb Bush will be GOP Nominee
- Palin Most Qualified Recent VP Nominee
- Christian Conservatives May Bolt GOP
- Romney Endorses McCain
- Roger Ailes for President?!
- Huckabee Hires Ed Rollins as Campaign Manager
- Experience: Obama v. Palin
- Jerry Brown Next California Governor?
- Does Iowa Mean Nothing to the GOP?
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- Update on the Fort Hood Massacre
- OTB Latenight – Soft Cell
- Caption Contest Winners
- Breaking: Shootings at Fort Hood (Updated)
- Pentagon Expected To Ask For Supplementary War Funding. As Usual.
- Marking the Anniversary of the Embassy Seizure
- Macaca Haunts the Washington Post « NotionsCapital
- Turshi [!] linked with cpac convention
Is it just me, or has this electoral cycle been rife with delusional positions in terms of who can, and cannot, be elected president? Not to mention rampant fantasies about specific candidates, both in terms of how great they are and how awful they are?
It's not you.
Comforting to know.
He believes there’s still time to beat back the tide that seems to have John McCain winning the nomination with Mitt Romney as the only plausible alternative. But who?
We could just have Nancy channel Ronnie through her astrological wizardry and keep Cheney around to run the day-to-day operations.
Of course, many would argue that the latter two shouldn’t have won. And the election of the first resulted in a war that pitted brother against brother which killed over half a million Americans.
Not to nitpick, but I think it is a little misleading, to say the least, to imply that it was Lincoln's election which caused the Civil War. Breakfast doesn't cause lunch.
This guy Richard Viguerie has been spamming my email box for months now. I'm glad to finally know who he is.
