Gerry Studds’ ‘Husband’ Denied Pension
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, October 17, 2006 |
Via Michael Demmons, I see that Gerry Studds’ “widower” will be denied death benefits.
Gerry Studds, the nation’s first openly gay congressman, pushed the country to another landmark development when he died Saturday: the federal government for the first time will deny death benefits to a congressman’s gay spouse.
The federal government does not recognize the 2004 Massachusetts’ marriage between Studds and Dean Hara, and won’t provide a portion of Studds’ $114,337 annual pension to his surviving spouse.
The federal law, defined by the Defense of Marriage Act, not only trumps the Bay State’s gay marriage law but reveals its limitations. “A gay spouse will not receive any sort of pension or annuity or anything like that,” said Chad Cowan, a spokesman for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which administers the congressional pension program under federal law.
This isn’t surprising, given that Congress went out of its way to pass DOMA and that even the Massachussets law was imposed upon the state by judicial fiat, expressly against the will of the state’s elected representatives. From the standpoint of the federal government and 49 or 50 states, Studds and Hara were simply not married (thus the use of scare quotes in the title and lede sentence).
Still, Demmons is right: This shows the limits of the “we don’t need marriage because we can protect each other by simply drawing up contracts” argument. Presumably, Studds left Hara as his beneficiary in his will, even aside from the marriage. That’s not going to override federal and state law on pensions, however, which almost universally limit the right to pass survivor benefits to legally recognized spousal relationships.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Census Worker Suicide
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
- Thought of the Day
- Queer International Studies
- OTB Latenight – r.e.m.
- Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with First openly gay congressman dies...
- rightlinx.com linked with Gerry Studds and Marriage Benefits
$114,337 annual pension
They sure like to feed from the trough even after they retire, don't they?
Comment in violation of site policies deleted.
This brings up a legal question that hadn't occurred to me until just now... I assume from this that pension benefits aren't considered "property" - in that Studds could will his (for instance) house to anyone he wanted to, but not the proceeds of his retirement. Is that how this works?
If you read the remainder of the quoted article, you will learn that Bob Ney will continue to receive his pension even while he is in prison; as I am sure Cunningham is and DeLay will.
Bottom line: It's better to be a convicted felon in this country than it is to be gay.
len; and from what i hear , its better to be gay if you're a convicted felon! since our prison system turns a blind eye towards inmate rape. they even seem to like it.
Studds "husband" isn't and never was his husband. All the queers out there get shafted again, as it should be.
Comments are Closed
