Comments on: Gillette Fusion Conspiracy Theory

By: Lokki

Lokki — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:01:57 +0000

I'm reminded of the old Saturday Night Live joke commercial for a 5-bladed cartridge razor, which came out when two blades had just appeared. The slogan for the commercial was, "Because you'll believe anything" I've taken to using whatever they send me in the mail until it's gone and then reverting to the lower cost 3-bladed razors. I don't buy replacement cartridges, because it's usually cheaper to buy a package of 8 - 10 throw-away razors on sale. Since each razor lasts about a month, it's pretty economical. As for 5 blades vs. 3 - here is my thinking - there's a limit to have much any razor can do. When I shave at 6 in the morning, I cross-shave and generally remove ALL of my beard statistically speaking. After that, it's up to the rate at which it grows back. 5 bladed razors still can't prevent the 5 0'clock shadow I have.... because even 5 blades can't prevent it from growing back. Now, I think the electric manual razor is a gimmick that will vanish - as soon as Gillette can think of something else.

By: carpeicthus

carpeicthus — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:55:53 +0000

… which is why I use a Bowie knife.

By: Harold Ogle

Harold Ogle — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:50:49 +0000

When the Fusion first hit the stores, it was almost impossible to find Mach3 blades for my razor. I bought the Fusion out of desperation.

Now I hear that Gillette is about to introduce a new razor, and I can't find blades for my Fusion.

I'm going back to the Mach3...Blades are available again.

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:24:44 +0000

I've used both the Mach 3 and the Fusion sample I got in the mail, and the Mach 3 gave me a better shave. I have thick facial hair, and the Fusion's blades are so close together, that the cut hair got stuck between the blades. I was constantly wiping them off with my thumb, after every pass.

I've given up on those expensive razors, and now I use the disposable Bic three-blade razors with the pivoting head. I can get 6 of them for less than a 4-blade refill for the Mach 3, and the blades are spaced far enough apart that a simple swish in the sink cleans them off. I get a much smoother shave from them, and at a fraction of the cost.

By: legion

legion — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:07:14 +0000

I don't think I have a particularly harsh (or soft) set of facial hair, and I've been happily using the old 2-bladed Sensor 2 for ages. I tried the Mach 3 some time back, and it confirmed all my guesses about the stupidity of the ever-escalating "blade wars" - I got a very smooth shave out of it, but it was a) noticeably, but not vastly, superior to the double-blade, b) significantly more expensive per blade, and c) significantly more expensive per shave, since I can get weeks of use out of the old cartiges, but the greater # and thinner construction of the fancier blades makes them wear out much faster. I suppose people with particularly sensitive skin might find it worthwhile, but for my money it's just not worth it...

By: Kent

Kent — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:27:24 +0000

I have a fairly heavy beard but tender skin. I get razor burn from an electric razor. I avoid manual razors so as not to frighten small children with my bloodsoaked visage, at least away from Halloween.

By: Alex Knapp

Alex Knapp — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:46:17 +0000

I normally use a Mach 3, but tried the Fusion when I got a free handle in the mail. And to be honest, my old Mach 3 does give me a far superior shave to the Fusion--I experienced most of the problems that Lileks did.

And the nice thing is that Mach 3 cartridges seem to keep dropping in price. But then, I buy them in bulk at Costco.

By: Dave Schuler

Dave Schuler — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:05:28 +0000

Just a brief word on my own experience in getting a good shave. I've been shaving daily for nearly 50 years and I'm currently getting the best shaves of my life, largely on the basis of using a really good shaving cream, a good brush for the first time in my life, and a different shaving strategy. I think those are a lot more important than minor improvements in blades on safety razors.

I remember the enormous difference between the shave I used to get with the old replaceable blades I used to use and the new cartridge-style blades. Subsequent improvements in the cartridges haven't been nearly as dramatic.

By: just me

just me — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:00:16 +0000

My husband can't use an electric shaver-they tend to irritate his skin.

He gets some brand that has three blades, he has no complaints, although a blade doesn't last him very long.

I seriously doubt they make the packaged blad better and the refills worse, but it is an interesting theory.

By: John Burgess

John Burgess — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:52:04 +0000

I'm agreeing with James. I see no difference between 'first' blade and later blades. I've a battery powered handle for home and a non-powered one for travel. I don't bother with buying the blades specified for one or the other, just using whichever is on sale at the time I need new blades. The price of blades, though, is pretty outrageous. But that was always the Gillette business plan. I know it and can avoid it if I choose.

By: DC Loser

DC Loser — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:22:49 +0000

I love my Panasonic wet/dry electic razor. I can wash the whole thing in the sink after using. Had it over 6 years and still going strong on the original blades.

By: Patrick T. McGuire

Patrick T. McGuire — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:14:54 +0000

A problem I don't have with my electric shaver. I got tired of cutting off the two moles on my face so I switched to electric. It takes me a bit longer to shave but I don't have any cuts or razor burn in the end. And I don't spend a fortune on plastics that end up in the land fill.