<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giuliani Campaign Strong Arms Wall Street?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:09:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/comment-page-1/#comment-113086</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/#comment-113086</guid>
		<description>I thought you could only strong arm someone from a position of power.  Would ham-handed have been a better qualifier than heavy handed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you could only strong arm someone from a position of power.  Would ham-handed have been a better qualifier than heavy handed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/comment-page-1/#comment-113054</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/#comment-113054</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Get Back to Us&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;GET BACK TO US&quot;....Via James Joyner, the Political Insider passes along this tidbit:Word on Wall Street is that New York fundraisers for Rudy Giuliani are calling senior executives with histories of supporting Republican candidates with demands alon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>"Get Back to Us"...</strong></p>
<p>"GET BACK TO US"....Via James Joyner, the Political Insider passes along this tidbit:Word on Wall Street is that New York fundraisers for Rudy Giuliani are calling senior executives with histories of supporting Republican candidates with demands alon...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Hampshire State of Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/comment-page-1/#comment-133357</link>
		<dc:creator>New Hampshire State of Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/giuliani_campaign_strong_arms_wall_street/#comment-133357</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;not just because they don’t know where he stands on issues. It’s also because they know nothing of his pre-9/11 self, and the more they learn, the less attractive they will probably find him.   From the Washington Monthly:  &quot;GET BACK TO US&quot;....Via James Joyner, the Political Insider passes along this tidbit: Word on Wall Street is that New York fundraisers for Rudy Giuliani are calling senior executives with histories of supporting Republican candidates with demands along these lines: &quot;We need five people&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->not just because they don&rsquo;t know where he stands on issues. It&rsquo;s also because they know nothing of his pre-9/11 self, and the more they learn, the less attractive they will probably find him.   From the Washington Monthly:  "GET BACK TO US"....Via James Joyner, the Political Insider passes along this tidbit: Word on Wall Street is that New York fundraisers for Rudy Giuliani are calling senior executives with histories of supporting Republican candidates with demands along these lines: "We need five people<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
