<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giuliani Most Popular, Clinton and Romney Least</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:13:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141990</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141990</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;None of the Democrat candidates can claim that level of service.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But they will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>None of the Democrat candidates can claim that level of service.</p></blockquote>
<p>But they will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141859</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141859</guid>
		<description>Yes, actually Rudy&#039;s numbers have fallen by the exact same amount as has Obama&#039;s (20% net decline). 

And I do agree with Alex and those who raise the question of how Rudy&#039;s trend lines will go. Obama may well continue to lost support amongst Republicans, as his liberalism becomes more apparant, but I suspect he will maintain himself well amongst independents, and may actually improve amongst Democrats. 

Rudy however, still has some room to fall within his own pary, I suspect, and has lots of baggage that can be explored and lower his standing across the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, actually Rudy's numbers have fallen by the exact same amount as has Obama's (20% net decline). </p>
<p>And I do agree with Alex and those who raise the question of how Rudy's trend lines will go. Obama may well continue to lost support amongst Republicans, as his liberalism becomes more apparant, but I suspect he will maintain himself well amongst independents, and may actually improve amongst Democrats. </p>
<p>Rudy however, still has some room to fall within his own pary, I suspect, and has lots of baggage that can be explored and lower his standing across the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141844</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141844</guid>
		<description>I think the advantage Rudy has at the moment, is he appeals politically to the middle.  He isn&#039;t really extreme enough one way or the other to totally turn off the middle.

And his advantage is that the GOP base just doesn&#039;t seem to have anyone they want to get behind, so he is ahead by default.

I do thinik the more his personal life, and some of his more socially liberal views come to the forefront, that it will get tougher-but he benefits from there not being a super strong GOP candidate that people want to support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the advantage Rudy has at the moment, is he appeals politically to the middle.  He isn't really extreme enough one way or the other to totally turn off the middle.</p>
<p>And his advantage is that the GOP base just doesn't seem to have anyone they want to get behind, so he is ahead by default.</p>
<p>I do thinik the more his personal life, and some of his more socially liberal views come to the forefront, that it will get tougher-but he benefits from there not being a super strong GOP candidate that people want to support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141831</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141831</guid>
		<description>Rudy is going to win both the Republican nomination and the Presidency easily.  This is primarily because, as a 9/11 recovery worker, he has risked his life for the country.  

None of the Democrat candidates can claim that level of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy is going to win both the Republican nomination and the Presidency easily.  This is primarily because, as a 9/11 recovery worker, he has risked his life for the country.  </p>
<p>None of the Democrat candidates can claim that level of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141828</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141828</guid>
		<description>Hillary&#039;s number are a great example of the 50/50 divisive nation.

+71 among democrats, -71 among republicans (-9 among independents, the only democrat with a net negative among independents).

Rudy is a little different in that he has high positives on the GOP side (+64) and relatively low negatives on the democratic side (-9) and good positives among independents (+25).

On the democratic side, the more that is known about the person, the poorer their scores among republicans and independents, though among democrats the opposite is true. We know more about Hillary, then Gore, then Edwards and least about Obama.

Among the republicans, there is no such easily perceived correlation.


One other point, remember the 11th commandment. Unless you find the GOP candidate worse than all the democratic candidates, you should hesitate to speak ill of the GOP candidate (assuming you support the GOP in general). We shouldn&#039;t let the inter-party tussle in the primaries be used to weaken the candidate in the general election. I generally associate ill speakers at this stage to either be not very thoughtful, have very narrow perspective or to be pulling for the other party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary's number are a great example of the 50/50 divisive nation.</p>
<p>+71 among democrats, -71 among republicans (-9 among independents, the only democrat with a net negative among independents).</p>
<p>Rudy is a little different in that he has high positives on the GOP side (+64) and relatively low negatives on the democratic side (-9) and good positives among independents (+25).</p>
<p>On the democratic side, the more that is known about the person, the poorer their scores among republicans and independents, though among democrats the opposite is true. We know more about Hillary, then Gore, then Edwards and least about Obama.</p>
<p>Among the republicans, there is no such easily perceived correlation.</p>
<p>One other point, remember the 11th commandment. Unless you find the GOP candidate worse than all the democratic candidates, you should hesitate to speak ill of the GOP candidate (assuming you support the GOP in general). We shouldn't let the inter-party tussle in the primaries be used to weaken the candidate in the general election. I generally associate ill speakers at this stage to either be not very thoughtful, have very narrow perspective or to be pulling for the other party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: se7en</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141807</link>
		<dc:creator>se7en</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141807</guid>
		<description>I agree with Alex Knapp.

Guiliani&#039;s numbers are also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/giuliani_the_next_mccain/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;treading downward&lt;/a&gt;, as Joyner posted last month.

I am optimistic about Romney&#039;s numbers. As has been said about him, the more people get to know him, the more they&#039;ll like him. 47% still have yet to hear of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Alex Knapp.</p>
<p>Guiliani's numbers are also <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/giuliani_the_next_mccain/" rel="nofollow">treading downward</a>, as Joyner posted last month.</p>
<p>I am optimistic about Romney's numbers. As has been said about him, the more people get to know him, the more they'll like him. 47% still have yet to hear of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141800</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141800</guid>
		<description>I wonder how Giuliani&#039;s favorability ratings will hold as more of his rather shady personal life come into the forefront?  After all, we&#039;re talking about a guy whose kids won&#039;t speak to him and had an open and public affair.  Not to mention that his best friend and best man at his wedding has been indicted for child molestation and conspiracy to cover up same in the Catholic Church...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Giuliani's favorability ratings will hold as more of his rather shady personal life come into the forefront?  After all, we're talking about a guy whose kids won't speak to him and had an open and public affair.  Not to mention that his best friend and best man at his wedding has been indicted for child molestation and conspiracy to cover up same in the Catholic Church...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/comment-page-1/#comment-141794</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/08/giuliani_most_popular_clinton_and_romney_least_/#comment-141794</guid>
		<description>James, I think that Hillary Clinton is, basically, the regular Democratic nominee already.  Here&#039;s my question:  has the support of the Republican Party leadership coalesced around one of the candidates?  My sense is that it hasn&#039;t but I&#039;ve been suspecting that it would around Romney.

I think that both of those would be errors on the part of their respective parties but I guess that&#039;s what political parties are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I think that Hillary Clinton is, basically, the regular Democratic nominee already.  Here's my question:  has the support of the Republican Party leadership coalesced around one of the candidates?  My sense is that it hasn't but I've been suspecting that it would around Romney.</p>
<p>I think that both of those would be errors on the part of their respective parties but I guess that's what political parties are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
