Global Military Spending Tops $1T in 2004
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, June 7, 2005 |
One estimate puts global military spending at over one trillion for 2004, a new high in unadjusted dollars.
Global Military Spending Tops $1T in 2004 (AP)
For the first time since the Cold War, global military spending exceeded $1 trillion in 2004, nearly half of it by the United States, a prominent European think tank said Tuesday. As military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the war on terrorism continue, the world spent $1.035 trillion on defense during the year, corresponding to 2.6 percent of global gross domestic product, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said.
The figure “is only 6 percent lower in real terms than it was in (1987-88), which was the peak,” said SIPRI researcher Elisabeth Skons, who co-authored the organization’s annual report. Worldwide military expenditure increased 6 percent in 2004, matching the average annual increase since 2002, the institute said.
However, the figures may be on the low end, the institute said, as countries are increasingly outsourcing services related to armed conflict, such as military training and providing logistics in combat zones, without classifying them as military expenses.
That’s some serious cash, no matter how you slice it. Still, the fact that it’s actually much less in real terms than it was in the dying days of the Cold War is instructive.
It’s worth noting, too, that while some things that are legitimately “military” are outsourced to private contractors and not counted in this tally, the reverse is true as well. Presumably, U.S. military expenditures for such things as humanitarian relief missions are counted as military expenses. Even if the study excluded the direct costs for such things, the fixed cost salaries of soldiers and other employees would be counted as “military” as would the replacement cost of material and expendibles that were used/deprecated during such operations.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Caption Contest
- Palin – Beck 2012
- Obama: Disloyal, Ruthless, Cold
- Weak Democrats Hurt 2010 Senate Chances
- Third Quarter Growth Revised Downwards
- Obama Cabinet’s Limited Private Experience
- Google Apologizes for Michelle Obama Monkey Picture
- No OTB Radio Tonight
- Colleen Blanchard Schuler, RIP
- That’s What I Call A Loophole…
"Presumably, U.S. military expenditures for such things as humanitarian relief missions are counted as military expenses..."
I would argue that EVERY mission undertaken by the U.S. military is humanitarian in nature.
Of course, the world has to spend an equal amount to protect itself from American Imperialism...
a billion here and a billion there, pretty soon that could add up to some big bucks.
It's a good thing that the oil revenues in Iraq are paying for the entire operation there as Wolfw/nowits sit it would.
Comments are Closed
