“The joint opinion ...cannot bring itself to say that Roe was correct as an original matter, but the authors are of the view that the immediate question is not the soundness of Roe's resolution of the issue, but the precedential force that must be accorded to its holding. Instead of claiming that Roe was correct as a matter of original constitutional interpretation, the opinion therefore contains an elaborate discussion of stare decisis. This discussion of the principle of stare decisis appears to be almost entirely dicta, because the joint opinion does not apply that principle in dealing with Roe. Roe decided that a woman had a fundamental right to an abortion. The joint opinion rejects that view. Roe decided that abortion regulations were to be subjected to "strict scrutiny," and could be justified only in the light of "compelling state interests." The joint opinion rejects that view. Roe analyzed abortion regulation under a rigid trimester framework, a framework which has guided this Court's decisionmaking for 19 years. The joint opinion rejects that framework.....

…. In the end, having failed to put forth any evidence to prove any true reliance, the joint opinion's argument is based solely on generalized assertions about the national psyche, on a belief that the people of this country have grown accustomed to the Roe decision over the last 19 years and have "ordered their thinking and living around" it. As an initial matter, one might inquire how the joint opinion can view the "central holding" of Roe as so deeply rooted in our constitutional culture when it so casually uproots and disposes of that same decision's trimester framework.”

WHERE IS OSAMA BIN LADEN

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LIE THAT STARTED THIS WAR

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED BECAUSE BUSH WANTED TO GET RE-ELECTED

The following (AG: High Court Not Bound by Roe V. Wade) is causing a minor brouhaha, because the AG says that SCOTUS isn’t bound by Roe v. Wade...

From the Associated Press... The legal right to abortion is settled for lower courts, but the Supreme Court "is not...

Every sentient being that doesn't get their education from MTV and news from talking points emailed to the MSM by NARAL which, in all liklihood, is about 20% the population and 30% of voters.

Unfortunately, as you well know, sentience has no link to knowledge.

I guess that is why Justice Kennedy violated the "Palm Sunday Law" and got away with it.

Leave it to a Lawyer !!!!!!!

I guess this means that Democrats aren't sentient beings ...