working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Google to Maintain Search History

Tomorrow’s Washington Post reports that Google will maintain a list of all searches each individual user has ever made.

Google Accommodates Search History Buffs (WaPo)

Don’t take this personally, but Google wants your Web search history. A new feature offered by the Internet search leader invites people to save and view all the Web searches they conduct at Google. Launched in trial form Wednesday, Google’s “my search history” is designed as a kind of Internet memory aid, giving people new ways to find information they previously saw online and to repeat previous searches.

The search history is an optional feature that requires people to sign in, so Google can store their searching histories online and make them available later from any computer where they might sign in. People who already have an e-mail address from Google’s Gmail site or have registered at its Google Groups site can use those log-ins; anyone can also sign up for a new account

This is potentially quite useful, although this is something one can already do easily using bookmarks. One presumes, though, that this will have significant privacy concerns. Presumably, for example, this information would be available by subpoena for both criminal and civil cases.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
Tags | James Joyner
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

There is no way that I would ever agree to this svaing my search data. This would enable the current administration to look at everything and anything that interested mme.

Posted by Harry Melnick | April 23, 2005 | 07:10 pm | Permalink
 

Yeah sure. Let the facists subpoena and view your subversive searches. this is one fukin bad idea no one needs

Posted by Ralph Mugutzup | April 23, 2005 | 07:14 pm | Permalink
 

I agree, I really can't see myself getting any use out of such a feature.
It's sort of like gmail. I actually do enjoy deleting stuff *perminantly*. I do not want or need an archive.

It is probably intended for marketing purposes, not for spying on you.

Posted by C.B. | April 23, 2005 | 07:39 pm | Permalink
 

It says "optional", right? Besides Google already sticks cookies on your machine when you search. Almost every site you visit does so. I delete ones I don't need every day.

Posted by Tbird1107 | April 23, 2005 | 08:19 pm | Permalink
 

Plus, you're only assuming that your searches aren't already logged somewhere.

If you assume you have any privacy when you do anything on the Internet, where your every action goes through any number of computers, you're sadly mistaken.

Posted by Brian J. | April 23, 2005 | 09:26 pm | Permalink
 

I don't even need to see certain people's Google histories to know they probably search often for "What's the best tinfoil for making my new hat?"

Posted by McGehee | April 23, 2005 | 09:58 pm | Permalink
 

BTW, Harry and Ralph: Be sure to check under your beds tonight. You never know where Ashcroft might turn up.

Posted by McGehee | April 23, 2005 | 09:59 pm | Permalink
 

"Yeah sure. Let the facists subpoena and view your subversive searches. this is one fukin bad idea no one needs"

"There is no way that I would ever agree to this svaing my search data. This would enable the current administration to look at everything and anything that interested mme."

I can't believe these posts.

You guys are worried about the, SAVING your search data? Don't you realize when you use _their_ search service you are agreeing to let them use that data how ever they see fit? Same as always, and same as every other search company. How do you think they can create lists of the most popular searches? Believe me there is a trail of information in their system when you use it, how else can they study what works and doesn't? This is hardly some big brother sitting in your google-bar. It's there for your convience. The original article says it's the same thing as bookmarks, but that's just not true. You have to organize your bookmarks and know it's there. The average user has a mess of bookmarks in a huge list. When y ou go to make google searches your google search history is available. Without bookmarks. That's a great thing. I love how the press loves to jump on google for anything that might imply they are violating your privacy, which is about the stupidest thing I ever heard. All companies have these agreements you implicitly agree to when you make use of their services.

Posted by Name | April 24, 2005 | 07:43 am | Permalink
 

If you're searching something you're paranoid about, switch to Yahoo. Or find a favorite obscure search site, and use them.

If you're that paranoid, you should have cookies turned off anyway.

Posted by Eric | April 24, 2005 | 07:53 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.