<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Clawing Back in Key Senate Races</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/comment-page-1/#comment-101746</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/#comment-101746</guid>
		<description>To put this in perspective, the GOP is at a 75 year high in both house and senate seats. A 5 seat senate loss would put them back roughly 5 years. 

There are also 5 to 7 senate races where better recruiting could have made a world of difference. If the GOP had recruited the right set of candidates, we would be talking about breaking even or even gaining seats. I think the 2008 recruiting season is likely to be much stronger for the simple reason that the Senate seats can draft off the national campaign. If the dems do take the house, they will be having to defend some GOP leaning districts (e.g. TX-22 if it falls).

The macro trend is still towards the GOP. If you look at what they need to do (getting back to basics on smaller government) vs what the dems need to do (become trust worthy on national security) the GOP has an easier time of turning around short term set backs. That said, they do need to do the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put this in perspective, the GOP is at a 75 year high in both house and senate seats. A 5 seat senate loss would put them back roughly 5 years. </p>
<p>There are also 5 to 7 senate races where better recruiting could have made a world of difference. If the GOP had recruited the right set of candidates, we would be talking about breaking even or even gaining seats. I think the 2008 recruiting season is likely to be much stronger for the simple reason that the Senate seats can draft off the national campaign. If the dems do take the house, they will be having to defend some GOP leaning districts (e.g. TX-22 if it falls).</p>
<p>The macro trend is still towards the GOP. If you look at what they need to do (getting back to basics on smaller government) vs what the dems need to do (become trust worthy on national security) the GOP has an easier time of turning around short term set backs. That said, they do need to do the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent G. Budge</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/comment-page-1/#comment-101719</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent G. Budge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/#comment-101719</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The overall trend is bad news for the Republicans. A loss of five seats is huge by any reasonable measure. Still, that would still leave them in control.&lt;/em&gt;

The real bad news is that negative campaigning still works, for both sides.  It is a strong disincentive for anyone who values his own good name to run for public office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The overall trend is bad news for the Republicans. A loss of five seats is huge by any reasonable measure. Still, that would still leave them in control.</em></p>
<p>The real bad news is that negative campaigning still works, for both sides.  It is a strong disincentive for anyone who values his own good name to run for public office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake up America</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/comment-page-1/#comment-101712</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake up America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/gop_clawing_back_in_key_senate_races/#comment-101712</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Good News From Iraq Part #2...&lt;/strong&gt;

Seems that people almost &quot;like&quot; the bad news they keep hearing from the left media about Iraq, it justifies their anti-war philosophy, yet when I post some of the good news coming out of Iraq they get up in arms (no pun intended). 
Now, as promised,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good News From Iraq Part #2...</strong></p>
<p>Seems that people almost "like" the bad news they keep hearing from the left media about Iraq, it justifies their anti-war philosophy, yet when I post some of the good news coming out of Iraq they get up in arms (no pun intended).<br />
Now, as promised,...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
