<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Congressman&#8217;s Wife Claims Ejected from SOTU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:15:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72285</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72285</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cindy Sheehan And Congressman&#039;s Wife Booted...&lt;/strong&gt;

Everyone knows that Cindy Sheehan got the boot from the SOTU the other night, but what&#039;s not been mentioned much is this:

The wife of Representative C-W- Bill Young says she was ejected during President Bush&#039;s State of the Union address for wearin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cindy Sheehan And Congressman's Wife Booted...</strong></p>
<p>Everyone knows that Cindy Sheehan got the boot from the SOTU the other night, but what's not been mentioned much is this:</p>
<p>The wife of Representative C-W- Bill Young says she was ejected during President Bush's State of the Union address for wearin...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72267</guid>
		<description>Herb&#039;s America:  where arresting someone who&#039;s not breaking the law is A-OK, provided she&#039;s a &quot;troublemaker.&quot;

FWIW, I&#039;m not a Sheehan fan; the ranch vigil was okay, but her 15 minutes are up, and she holds too many wacky views for my tastes.  But god knows, she&#039;s dealing better with the loss of her son in Bush&#039;s War than I would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herb's America:  where arresting someone who's not breaking the law is A-OK, provided she's a "troublemaker."</p>
<p>FWIW, I'm not a Sheehan fan; the ranch vigil was okay, but her 15 minutes are up, and she holds too many wacky views for my tastes.  But god knows, she's dealing better with the loss of her son in Bush's War than I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginifer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72229</guid>
		<description>Beverly Young sounds like a great supporter for the injured military personnel.  It&#039;s great that she speaks her mind and doesn&#039;t let anyone push her around.

She doesn&#039;t support the war, but at least she is doing everything she can to help the soldiers who have been wounded.  You really have to admire her for that.

As far as the tee-shirt incidents with her and Cindy Sheehan - much ado about nothing.  Neither should have been arrested.

Let&#039;s all admit it, Sheehan is a publicity seeker and is not helping the soldiers by acting and speaking like a loon.  She&#039;d be much better off if she acted rational and with thought.  She&#039;s her own worst enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beverly Young sounds like a great supporter for the injured military personnel.  It's great that she speaks her mind and doesn't let anyone push her around.</p>
<p>She doesn't support the war, but at least she is doing everything she can to help the soldiers who have been wounded.  You really have to admire her for that.</p>
<p>As far as the tee-shirt incidents with her and Cindy Sheehan - much ado about nothing.  Neither should have been arrested.</p>
<p>Let's all admit it, Sheehan is a publicity seeker and is not helping the soldiers by acting and speaking like a loon.  She'd be much better off if she acted rational and with thought.  She's her own worst enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72227</link>
		<dc:creator>California Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 04:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72227</guid>
		<description>Capitol Police &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/01/D8FGKS480.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apologize, Drop Charge&lt;/a&gt; against Sheehan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capitol Police <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/01/D8FGKS480.html" rel="nofollow">Apologize, Drop Charge</a> against Sheehan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72221</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72221</guid>
		<description>Anderson:

There you go again. way out in left field.  

Ms Young was not a troublemakes and Cindy is nothine is a troublemaker.

See, that was easy, wasn&#039;t it?

A t-Shirt sign is not the proper wear for a &quot;State of the Union&quot; gathering. It&#039;s tacky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson:</p>
<p>There you go again. way out in left field.  </p>
<p>Ms Young was not a troublemakes and Cindy is nothine is a troublemaker.</p>
<p>See, that was easy, wasn't it?</p>
<p>A t-Shirt sign is not the proper wear for a "State of the Union" gathering. It's tacky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Florida Masochist</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72212</link>
		<dc:creator>The Florida Masochist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72212</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;For goodness sake why?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I have a pretty open interpertation of the Freedom of Speech....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For goodness sake why?...</strong></p>
<p>I have a pretty open interpertation of the Freedom of Speech....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72207</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72207</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Though I would wonder whether the Capitol Police Board didnt amend its regulations after the 1997 Bynum decision.&lt;/em&gt;

Hey, &lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_01_29-2006_02_04.shtml#1138831261&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;evidently not&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Capitol Police did not explain why Sheehan was arrested and Young was not. However, Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer was asking the U.S. attorney&#039;s office to drop the charge against Sheehan, according to Deputy House Sergeant of Arms Kerri Hanley.

&quot;They were operating under the misguided impression that the T-shirt was not allowed,&quot; Hanley said Wednesday. &quot;The fact that she (Sheehan) was wearing a T-shirt is not enough reason to be asked to leave the gallery or be removed from the gallery or be arrested.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;I dunno, y&#039;all ... does Cindy Sheehan seem like the kind who would sue over this?  Tough call ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Though I would wonder whether the Capitol Police Board didnt amend its regulations after the 1997 Bynum decision.</em></p>
<p>Hey, <a href="http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_01_29-2006_02_04.shtml#1138831261" rel="nofollow">evidently not</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Capitol Police did not explain why Sheehan was arrested and Young was not. However, Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer was asking the U.S. attorney's office to drop the charge against Sheehan, according to Deputy House Sergeant of Arms Kerri Hanley.</p>
<p>"They were operating under the misguided impression that the T-shirt was not allowed," Hanley said Wednesday. "The fact that she (Sheehan) was wearing a T-shirt is not enough reason to be asked to leave the gallery or be removed from the gallery or be arrested."</p></blockquote>
<p>I dunno, y'all ... does Cindy Sheehan seem like the kind who would sue over this?  Tough call ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72206</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72206</guid>
		<description>Note that the no T-shirts rule &lt;a href=&quot;http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/02/learning-from-dear-leader.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is said to be illegal&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;blockquote&gt;That action was taken pursuant to the U.S. Code, in which Congress decreed as follows: &quot;It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons wilfully and knowingly . . . to parade, demonstrate or picket within any Capitol Building.&quot; 140 U.S.C. § 193(f)(b)(7).

As the &lt;em&gt;Bynum&lt;/em&gt; court explained: &quot;Believing that the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a &#039;demonstration,&#039; the United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets &#039;demonstration activity,&#039;&quot; and that regulation specifically provides that it &quot;does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or other similar articles of apparel that convey a message. Traffic Regulations for the Capitol Grounds, § 158&quot; (emphasis added).&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Though I would wonder whether the Capitol Police Board didn&#039;t amend its regulations after the 1997 &lt;i&gt;Bynum&lt;/i&gt; decision.  Damn if I know where to find the latest version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that the no T-shirts rule <a href="http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/02/learning-from-dear-leader.html" rel="nofollow">is said to be illegal</a>.<br />
<blockquote>That action was taken pursuant to the U.S. Code, in which Congress decreed as follows: "It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons wilfully and knowingly . . . to parade, demonstrate or picket within any Capitol Building." 140 U.S.C. § 193(f)(b)(7).</p>
<p>As the <em>Bynum</em> court explained: "Believing that the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a 'demonstration,' the United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets 'demonstration activity,'" and that regulation specifically provides that it "does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or other similar articles of apparel that convey a message. Traffic Regulations for the Capitol Grounds, § 158" (emphasis added).</p></blockquote>
<p>Though I would wonder whether the Capitol Police Board didn't amend its regulations after the 1997 <i>Bynum</i> decision.  Damn if I know where to find the latest version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72202</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72202</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If Cindy Sheehans shirt isnt allowed inside, neither should Mrs. Youngs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is, apparently, the rule as it has stood since long before the present administration.

From what I&#039;ve read, having the t-shirt gets you asked to leave. Refusing to leave when asked gets you arrested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If Cindy Sheehans shirt isnt allowed inside, neither should Mrs. Youngs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is, apparently, the rule as it has stood since long before the present administration.</p>
<p>From what I've read, having the t-shirt gets you asked to leave. Refusing to leave when asked gets you arrested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72203</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72203</guid>
		<description>Mark: Mostly, I just mean that she doesn&#039;t behave in a manner one expects of a congressional wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Mostly, I just mean that she doesn't behave in a manner one expects of a congressional wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72198</guid>
		<description>James, after reading the article, I would hardly think &quot;antics&quot; is a kind word to describe Mrs. Young&#039;s actions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, after reading the article, I would hardly think "antics" is a kind word to describe Mrs. Young's actions...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72192</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72192</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush makes the most of last 3 years...&lt;/strong&gt;

After Social Security defeat, President Bush will in his State of the Union address do what other pr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush makes the most of last 3 years...</strong></p>
<p>After Social Security defeat, President Bush will in his State of the Union address do what other pr...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_congressmans_wife_claims_ejected_from_state_of_the_union/comment-page-1/#comment-72190</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13537#comment-72190</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the age-old issue. It&#039;s not a &quot;protest&quot; if it&#039;s a stance YOU agree with. Without knowing details, I&#039;d actually applaud the consistent application of the rules in this situation. If Cindy Sheehan&#039;s shirt isn&#039;t allowed inside, neither should Mrs. Young&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the age-old issue. It's not a "protest" if it's a stance YOU agree with. Without knowing details, I'd actually applaud the consistent application of the rules in this situation. If Cindy Sheehan's shirt isn't allowed inside, neither should Mrs. Young's.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
