<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Pollster Says May Be Over for Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:19:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81954</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 02:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81954</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait for &#039;06 and &#039;08. Boy, howdy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can't wait for '06 and '08. Boy, howdy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81767</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81767</guid>
		<description>YAJ:  A good point that I had intended to make but forgot.  Indeed, by the 2004 election, Iraq was already quite controverial and it was obvious we were in for a longer haul there than most had thought/hoped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAJ:  A good point that I had intended to make but forgot.  Indeed, by the 2004 election, Iraq was already quite controverial and it was obvious we were in for a longer haul there than most had thought/hoped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81760</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81760</guid>
		<description>may be similar,â?? Tarrance said. The two years â??are going to be relatively bundled together because of Iraq.â??

Gee. I could have sworn that somebody mentioned something about Iraq in 2004. I even remember some talk about Iraq before the 2002 elections. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html 

First, we went from 221 republicans in the house elected in 2000, to 229 republicans in the house for 2002 and then to 232 republicans in the house for 2004.

Second, we went from 50 republicans and 50 democrats elected in 2000 to 51 republicans elected in 2002 and then to 55 republicans elected in 2004.

Third, Bush won a clear majority of the popular vote and the electoral college vote and a majority of the states in 2004.

Fourth, if you are following what is going on in Iraq (as opposed to just recycling the lefts talking points that have led to an increase in republicans in 2004), there does seem to be some very positive things occurring in Iraq.

So to say that 2006 or 2008 will be the first referendum on Iraq and then to go further and think that referendums on Iraq haven&#039;t been to the republican&#039;s benefit in purely objective standards (like winning office) as opposed to moral victories (like the Kos 0 for 18 record) is ludicrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may be similar,â?? Tarrance said. The two years â??are going to be relatively bundled together because of Iraq.â??</p>
<p>Gee. I could have sworn that somebody mentioned something about Iraq in 2004. I even remember some talk about Iraq before the 2002 elections. <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html</a> </p>
<p>First, we went from 221 republicans in the house elected in 2000, to 229 republicans in the house for 2002 and then to 232 republicans in the house for 2004.</p>
<p>Second, we went from 50 republicans and 50 democrats elected in 2000 to 51 republicans elected in 2002 and then to 55 republicans elected in 2004.</p>
<p>Third, Bush won a clear majority of the popular vote and the electoral college vote and a majority of the states in 2004.</p>
<p>Fourth, if you are following what is going on in Iraq (as opposed to just recycling the lefts talking points that have led to an increase in republicans in 2004), there does seem to be some very positive things occurring in Iraq.</p>
<p>So to say that 2006 or 2008 will be the first referendum on Iraq and then to go further and think that referendums on Iraq haven't been to the republican's benefit in purely objective standards (like winning office) as opposed to moral victories (like the Kos 0 for 18 record) is ludicrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perma</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81751</link>
		<dc:creator>Perma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81751</guid>
		<description>CIA is done.  Union or no union, bye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CIA is done.  Union or no union, bye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81724</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81724</guid>
		<description>Bush probably will bring troops home before the job is done for political reason. If he puts politics before America&#039;s well being, he will probably do the same for Iraq.

When Iraq comes apart at the seams, American&#039;s will be asking if it was worth thousands of American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars of our tax money.

Don&#039;t think the strategy will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush probably will bring troops home before the job is done for political reason. If he puts politics before America's well being, he will probably do the same for Iraq.</p>
<p>When Iraq comes apart at the seams, American's will be asking if it was worth thousands of American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars of our tax money.</p>
<p>Don't think the strategy will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGone</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81720</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81720</guid>
		<description>Chris, Bush is DONE and so is your attitude.  Sorry - not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, Bush is DONE and so is your attitude.  Sorry - not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81717</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81717</guid>
		<description>Bush will start bringing the troops home before the fall elections, and with the economy still strong his popularity will go up and republicans will take the elections.

Haha liberals!  You have been, are, and will be again the biggest losers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush will start bringing the troops home before the fall elections, and with the economy still strong his popularity will go up and republicans will take the elections.</p>
<p>Haha liberals!  You have been, are, and will be again the biggest losers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81713</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 21:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81713</guid>
		<description>Bush is toast as far as the White House is concerned in 2008 anyway.

That is, unless he pulls a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,194557,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chavez.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is toast as far as the White House is concerned in 2008 anyway.</p>
<p>That is, unless he pulls a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,194557,00.html" rel="nofollow">Chavez.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81711</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 19:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81711</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of right after the first Gulf war, G. H. W. Bush had approval ratings in the 90s, come the election he was very weak due to the economy.  If things get better in Iraq (e.g., catching Zarqawi and such) then Bush could very well bounce back.

If things stay the same or get worse, then he and his party is toast at least as far as the White House goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of right after the first Gulf war, G. H. W. Bush had approval ratings in the 90s, come the election he was very weak due to the economy.  If things get better in Iraq (e.g., catching Zarqawi and such) then Bush could very well bounce back.</p>
<p>If things stay the same or get worse, then he and his party is toast at least as far as the White House goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/comment-page-1/#comment-81710</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 19:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/gop_pollster_says_may_be_over_for_bush_/#comment-81710</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Approval ratings plunge for Bush, Republican Party...&lt;/strong&gt;

WASHINGTON -- Angry conservatives are driving the approval ratings of President Bush and the GOP-led...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Approval ratings plunge for Bush, Republican Party...</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON -- Angry conservatives are driving the approval ratings of President Bush and the GOP-led...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
