<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Hiring Boom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mamma&#8217;s Don&#8217;t Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Cowboys &#171; QC Examiner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/comment-page-1/#comment-351289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mamma&#8217;s Don&#8217;t Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Cowboys &#171; QC Examiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/government_hiring_boom/#comment-351289</guid>
		<description>[...] Governments added 76,800 jobs in the first quarter of 2008 while private companies shed 286,000 jobs during the same time period. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Governments added 76,800 jobs in the first quarter of 2008 while private companies shed 286,000 jobs during the same time period. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/comment-page-1/#comment-351115</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/government_hiring_boom/#comment-351115</guid>
		<description>There is a effort by the Army to grow by 50,000 in next four years.  And to grow the VA, expand DHS, and put more cops on the street.  The question is are we hiring &quot;doers&quot; or are we hiring more administrators.  Sadly I beive its the later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a effort by the Army to grow by 50,000 in next four years.  And to grow the VA, expand DHS, and put more cops on the street.  The question is are we hiring "doers" or are we hiring more administrators.  Sadly I beive its the later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/comment-page-1/#comment-351110</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/government_hiring_boom/#comment-351110</guid>
		<description>Another part of the sad legacy of the incompetent Bush Administration.  For seven years the Republicans never got a budget in on time, never even tried to balance the budget, never tried to cut the budget, and never tried to limit pork spending. 

The end result is a huge blow to anyone who claims to be a conservative, the collapse of the Republicans Party, and massive growth of the government in the future without any restraint. 

Maybe Republicans will learn that voting for the lesser of two evils is just a dumb idea and that nominating competent people is more important than voting for establishment candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another part of the sad legacy of the incompetent Bush Administration.  For seven years the Republicans never got a budget in on time, never even tried to balance the budget, never tried to cut the budget, and never tried to limit pork spending. </p>
<p>The end result is a huge blow to anyone who claims to be a conservative, the collapse of the Republicans Party, and massive growth of the government in the future without any restraint. </p>
<p>Maybe Republicans will learn that voting for the lesser of two evils is just a dumb idea and that nominating competent people is more important than voting for establishment candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/comment-page-1/#comment-350961</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/government_hiring_boom/#comment-350961</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;that story doesn&#039;t say whether the new hires are for completely new positions or were replacing positions that were vacant from retirement or other attrition&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A fair point.  I&#039;m not seeing the data in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bls.gov/bls/whatsnew.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;latest releases&lt;/a&gt;, even though there are two dated today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>that story doesn't say whether the new hires are for completely new positions or were replacing positions that were vacant from retirement or other attrition</p></blockquote>
<p>A fair point.  I'm not seeing the data in their <a href="http://www.bls.gov/bls/whatsnew.htm" rel="nofollow">latest releases</a>, even though there are two dated today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/comment-page-1/#comment-350960</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/government_hiring_boom/#comment-350960</guid>
		<description>Republicans and Democrats.  One is the party of big government and the other is the party of bigger government, though I lose track of which is which any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans and Democrats.  One is the party of big government and the other is the party of bigger government, though I lose track of which is which any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_hiring_boom/comment-page-1/#comment-350954</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/government_hiring_boom/#comment-350954</guid>
		<description>James, that story doesn&#039;t say whether the new hires are for completely new positions or were replacing positions that were vacant from retirement or other attrition.  The federal government is starting to experience a wave or retirements from its workforce.  it&#039;s projected 50% of its workforce can retire in 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, that story doesn't say whether the new hires are for completely new positions or were replacing positions that were vacant from retirement or other attrition.  The federal government is starting to experience a wave or retirements from its workforce.  it's projected 50% of its workforce can retire in 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
