<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single Government ID Card Closer to Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_id_card_closer_to_reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_id_card_closer_to_reality/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:06:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Legal XXX</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_id_card_closer_to_reality/comment-page-1/#comment-30750</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8606#comment-30750</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Single Government ID Moves Closer to Reality&lt;/strong&gt;
While I can be sympathetic to the libertarian-esque arguments against national ID cards, I tend to find them unpersuasive. Aside from the fact that the IDs in this story are for federal employees (which is so common sense it&#039;s clear why it wasn&#039;t tri...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Single Government ID Moves Closer to Reality</strong><br />
While I can be sympathetic to the libertarian-esque arguments against national ID cards, I tend to find them unpersuasive. Aside from the fact that the IDs in this story are for federal employees (which is so common sense it's clear why it wasn't tri...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_id_card_closer_to_reality/comment-page-1/#comment-30731</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8606#comment-30731</guid>
		<description>Charlie,

Actually, at least where I work, the CAC is used IN ADDITION TO the proximity badge and military ID/Geneva Convention card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie,</p>
<p>Actually, at least where I work, the CAC is used IN ADDITION TO the proximity badge and military ID/Geneva Convention card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie on the Pennsylvania Turnpike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_id_card_closer_to_reality/comment-page-1/#comment-30726</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie on the Pennsylvania Turnpike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8606#comment-30726</guid>
		<description>Your surpise (about not already being implemented) is correct.  There already is a Common Access Card (CAC) that the military and Defense Contractors use, complete with biometric data.  

The smart-card contains all sorts of data, including clearance information (and even as mundane as chow discounts), and are the principle form of ID.  The cards are required to send e-mail (from properly secured desktops), which will then act as &#039;digitally signed&#039; communications.

Leave it to the Unions to complain about them, altho at the Defense Agency position I held, even union employees had them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your surpise (about not already being implemented) is correct.  There already is a Common Access Card (CAC) that the military and Defense Contractors use, complete with biometric data.  </p>
<p>The smart-card contains all sorts of data, including clearance information (and even as mundane as chow discounts), and are the principle form of ID.  The cards are required to send e-mail (from properly secured desktops), which will then act as 'digitally signed' communications.</p>
<p>Leave it to the Unions to complain about them, altho at the Defense Agency position I held, even union employees had them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nominal Me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/government_id_card_closer_to_reality/comment-page-1/#comment-30720</link>
		<dc:creator>Nominal Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8606#comment-30720</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BLOGS / NEWS OF THE DAY:&lt;/strong&gt;
11:00 AM (EST): Outside the Beltway reports that national ID cards are probably on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BLOGS / NEWS OF THE DAY:</strong><br />
11:00 AM (EST): Outside the Beltway reports that national ID cards are probably on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
