Of course terrorism has receded from the public conscience. Many years have passed without another attack and the public has little to do with day to day anti-terror activities. That said the public still wants leaders who place protecting American citizens high on the agenda.

The public also wants to see a little less political correctness and a little more common sense in anti-terror efforts. Profiling works better than shoe removal.

Profiling works better than shoe removal.

No it doesn't, all profiling does is tell the terrorists "If you use people that don't match this set of criteria, they're more likely to succeed". If the searches include everybody, or even just a random sample, then terrorists have no way to increase their odds of getting through.

Profiling works when the perpetrator is already established, but it fails when the perpetrator can be chosen after the profile has been established.

Your point is well made - we should keep the events of 9/11 in perspective and we should not return the mindset of 9/10.

Unfortunately, in the name of doing just that, I expect we will do something far, far worse. We will continue to bicker, whine, and ignore the lessons of 9/11, blame ourselves for the actions of others, until one day we will have a million or two of our fellow Americans killed by some misled young radical that believes wanton mayhem and mass murder of the infidels is his path to eternal glory. And then once again we will unite, bury our dead, cry over our losses, seek out those we believe to be responsible until it is no longer convenient, appoint another commission to study what went so wrong, until we again start to again bicker, whine, and ignore history. As Americans we have the right to do so, and it is the Achilles tendon of America that we always choose to do so.

To this day, the commemorations of 9/11 still bring tears to my eyes. The old feelings of anger are still there, quietly smoldering under my otherwise placid surface.

Some of us will never forget.

Some of us will never forget

Are you saying that some have/will?

all profiling does is tell the terrorists "If you use people that don't match this set of criteria, they're more likely to succeed".

...for extremely limited values of "profiling." There are other things screeners can watch for besides superficial characteristics.

In fact, cops engage in the subtler techniques of "profiling" all the time to judge whether the clean-cut, well-dressed white kid in the car he just pulled over, needs to receive a warning, or have his car searched.

El Al profiles all passengers as part of it's security process. It is considered the safest airline on the world. That type of profiling does not limit itself to race or appearance but expands to encompass all aspects of appearance and behavior.

Our security personnel go out of their way to accommodate for fear of charges of racism. The public wants a better system.

It would also make no sense to publicize what the profiles are.

El Al profiles all passengers as part of it's security process. It is considered the safest airline on the world.

El Al does a hell of a lot more than profiling in order to earn that mantle. If you want to make profiling one aspect of security, I'm okay with that. I'm not worried about offending people, I'm worried about opening a hole in our security by _not_ adequately checking people who don't match the profile.

It would also make no sense to publicize what the profiles are.

It would be dangerous to rely on it being kept a secret when so many people will need to know what it is. Once it is leaked once, anybody can get it, and you can't exactly make a new profile when that happens. The system must be designed such that it will not be compromised even if the details of the profile are widely known.

I haven't forgotten 9/11. I'm speaking of the event itself. I'll never forget it. Of all the images that have stuck in my mind, the one comes back to me most often is that of the Chaplain of the New York Fire Department giving last rites to the firefighters before they went into the burning buildings. That moved me more than words can express.

Are you saying that some have/will?

Why are you so defensive? Do you feel guilty about something or someone.

It is very obvious that many have.

Why are you so defensive? Do you feel guilty about something or someone.

So, if you punch somebody in the face, and they try to defend themselves, obviously they deserved it. Nice logic there.

Michael, it was a punch in your face only if you have forgotten 9/11.

Chill.

Michael, it was a punch in your face only if you have forgotten 9/11.

So if I accused to of being a pedophile, you'd only be offended if it was true?

It is very obvious that many have.

You do not honor the dead of 9/11 by trying to exploit that tragedy for political gain or to try and pump yourself up.

Quite the contrary.

You do not honor the dead of 9/11 by trying to exploit that tragedy for political gain or to try and pump yourself up.

I know can't be talking to me and and about my people and
What does that have to do with you getting defensive when some one says, some people will never forget.

I know can't be talking to me and and about my people

McCain used 9/11 video as a politic prop. 'Nuff said...