<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hawaii Caucus First Next Time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hawaii_caucuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hawaii_caucuses/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hawaii_caucuses/comment-page-1/#comment-261108</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/hawaii_caucuses/#comment-261108</guid>
		<description>I suspect the seed of this idea comes from a reporter or campaign operative who was freezing their butt off in Iowa or New Hampshire.

Of course I would suggest that the partys hold a random draw for the first primaries. Say you draw on 1/1 and hold the primary on 3/1. It would effectively shorten the whole campaign as the initial state wouldn&#039;t be known until 2 months before the primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the seed of this idea comes from a reporter or campaign operative who was freezing their butt off in Iowa or New Hampshire.</p>
<p>Of course I would suggest that the partys hold a random draw for the first primaries. Say you draw on 1/1 and hold the primary on 3/1. It would effectively shorten the whole campaign as the initial state wouldn't be known until 2 months before the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hawaii_caucuses/comment-page-1/#comment-261074</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/hawaii_caucuses/#comment-261074</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, it would be somewhat more inconvenient for the candidates to shuttle between Hawaii, DC, and New Hampshire.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course, if B. Hussein wins the Presidency the Axis of Evil will likely launch another attack on Hawaii and assert an occupation of our soil. 

And because Hussein is reflexively anti-troops, he will destroy the military to the extent that the Axis of Evil&#039;s Pearl Harbor II will be successful.

By the time 2012 comes around, Hawaii will likely be part of Hussein&#039;s Indonesian homeland, repopulated with Mosques and madrassas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, it would be somewhat more inconvenient for the candidates to shuttle between Hawaii, DC, and New Hampshire.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, if B. Hussein wins the Presidency the Axis of Evil will likely launch another attack on Hawaii and assert an occupation of our soil. </p>
<p>And because Hussein is reflexively anti-troops, he will destroy the military to the extent that the Axis of Evil's Pearl Harbor II will be successful.</p>
<p>By the time 2012 comes around, Hawaii will likely be part of Hussein's Indonesian homeland, repopulated with Mosques and madrassas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
