<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Blasts Bush for Bill&#8217;s China Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:10:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-351848</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/#comment-351848</guid>
		<description>&quot;But it’s more than a little disingenuous to criticize Bush for carrying out policies that her husband started and claiming that it’s a partisan issue.&quot;

&quot;Disingenuous?&quot;  You&#039;re being so kind!  

Hopefully, it will make sound bite material for GOP TV ads if she gets the nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"But it&rsquo;s more than a little disingenuous to criticize Bush for carrying out policies that her husband started and claiming that it&rsquo;s a partisan issue."</p>
<p>"Disingenuous?"  You're being so kind!  </p>
<p>Hopefully, it will make sound bite material for GOP TV ads if she gets the nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnjagvet</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-351607</link>
		<dc:creator>vnjagvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 04:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/#comment-351607</guid>
		<description>Someon&#039;s asleep at the switch in the RW&#039;s campaign. She would be much more credible and effective by criticizing the policies of both WJC and W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someon's asleep at the switch in the RW's campaign. She would be much more credible and effective by criticizing the policies of both WJC and W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidL</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-351379</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/#comment-351379</guid>
		<description>So what was the quid pro quo for the deal, a campaign contribution or a contribution to the Clinton Library?   With the Clintons&#039; everythings is for sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what was the quid pro quo for the deal, a campaign contribution or a contribution to the Clinton Library?   With the Clintons' everythings is for sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-351163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/#comment-351163</guid>
		<description>IIRC extending permanent most-favored nation trading status to China, a move I thought was premature, happened on Bill Clinton&#039;s watch.  As the previous commented suggested, how soon they forget!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC extending permanent most-favored nation trading status to China, a move I thought was premature, happened on Bill Clinton's watch.  As the previous commented suggested, how soon they forget!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-351140</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/hillary_blasts_bush_for_bills_china_deal/#comment-351140</guid>
		<description>You mean to tell me that HRC is supposed to get all the credit for all that went right during Bills reign but no blame (at least shared) for something that went &#039;wrong&#039;.
I am so glad to learn that our future Commander-in-Chief is so adept at accepting responsibility.

Elect HRC and we will get what we deserve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean to tell me that HRC is supposed to get all the credit for all that went right during Bills reign but no blame (at least shared) for something that went 'wrong'.<br />
I am so glad to learn that our future Commander-in-Chief is so adept at accepting responsibility.</p>
<p>Elect HRC and we will get what we deserve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
