I probably see two Obama signs/supporters for every one sign from any other candidate.

If the booing happened-my vote is for rude attendees-if it is a Democratic general dinner-it is especially rude.

At a rally, where a candidate is stirring up supporters, boos wouldn't seem quite so rude.

I agree that the likelihood of a bunch of democrats not being able to listen respectfully to someone they disagree with approaches one. Whether that is them 'speaking truth to power' or being rude is in the eye of the beholder.

What I was pointing out was not the most likely scenario, but a sufficiently realistic one that in fairness to the Clintonistas it has to be pointed out. Given the news cycle, I suspect you are right that the Clintons would be roundly disputing the charge. But given the data (e.g. let out a noise that sounded like a thousand people collectively groaning) there may be enough interpretation of the sound that they don't have as clear a case. Of course that would also require them to think ahead and weigh the damage done by being seen to be 'booed' at a democratic function (which might actually be helpful in some quarters) and getting into a playground hissy fight about whether it actually happened.

You may have a good point there. But I can't bring myself to the point of this original story being disproved yet. Bush's audience response, as reported by the AP was quickly disproved as not being disrespectful to the former hound dog in chief.

As I have observed in the past, all of HRC's previous public appearances have been carefully scripted and managed and she fails miserably when she or her staff can not control the situation.