working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Hillary Clinton Denies She’s a Lesbian

Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton has come out of the closet: She’s heterosexual.

During an interview with The Advocate to be published next week, Sean Kennedy, the gay magazine’s news and features editor, asked the presidential candidate, “How do you respond to the occasional rumor that you’re a lesbian?”

“People say a lot of things about me, so I really don’t pay any attention to it,” Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.) replied. “It’s not true, but it is something that I have no control over. People will say what they want to say.”

For what it’s worth, I guess. I’ve always presumed she was straight but her denial doesn’t provide any meaningful additional evidence. As Larry Craig and others have shown, it’s possible for a high profile public figure to be gay, pretend to be straight, and even to deny being gay despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Countdown to condemnation from gay activist groups for not loudly proclaiming that she’d be proud to be gay 5, 4, 3 . . .

Slightly reworded for clarity.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

She may not be gay, but I hear she has a mighty wide stance...

Posted by legion | September 21, 2007 | 01:08 pm | Permalink
 

I’ve always presumed she was straight but, as Larry Craig and others have shown, it’s possible for a high profile public figure to be gay, pretend to be straight, and even to deny being gay despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

What is the "overwhelming evidence to the contrary" that Hilzilla is gay?

Posted by Triumph | September 21, 2007 | 01:13 pm | Permalink
 

Well I am certainly glad that's been settled! LOL

What does it say about her image that she has to clarify the matter? And given today's cultural climate, who wants to bet that this matter will now go away?

I am reminded of Neal Boortz who states of Hillary: "She is just like every other politician, she puts her pants on one leg at a time".

This should be fun.

Posted by Patrick T. McGuire | September 21, 2007 | 01:16 pm | Permalink
 

What is the "overwhelming evidence to the contrary" that Hilzilla is gay?

None of which I'm aware. I was referring to Craig and others, not Hillary, by way of saying that denials don't mean anything.

Posted by James Joyner | September 21, 2007 | 01:27 pm | Permalink
 

It depends on what your definition of gay is.

Posted by G.A.Phillips | September 21, 2007 | 01:59 pm | Permalink
 

None of which I'm aware. I was referring to Craig and others, not Hillary, by way of saying that denials don't mean anything.

Perhaps we should see if she floats.

Countdown to condemnation from gay activist groups for not loudly proclaiming that she’d be proud to be gay 5, 4, 3 . . .

2... 1... Nothing, because she threw this in there: "it is something that I have no control over".

Posted by Michael | September 21, 2007 | 02:02 pm | Permalink
 

None of which I'm aware. I was referring to Craig and others, not Hillary, by way of saying that denials don't mean anything.

I must say that your phrasing is very Rovian and that putting both Craig and Hillzilla in the sentence is a bit misleading--especially when you put the "overwhelming evidence" bit in.

"I've always presumed that George Bush has the interests of the country at heart but, as Stalin, Adolph Hitler and Kim Jong Il have shown, it's possible for a country's leader to murder and starve his constitutents, pretend to be a defender of his nation, and even to deny contrary accusations despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary..."

Posted by Triumph | September 21, 2007 | 02:02 pm | Permalink
 

Truffers unite. Note she didn't deny being bisexual.

Posted by yetanotherjohn | September 21, 2007 | 02:03 pm | Permalink
 

A wealthy socialite told me in Chicago a few years ago that Hillarious's significant other was a female ObGyn med doctor living in NYC.

As far as this woman knew [through mutual friends], the "marriage" was/is "monogamous."

Except maybe she was bi with Vince Foster?

Oh, yeah, and that other guy once upon a time.

Posted by daveinboca | September 21, 2007 | 02:11 pm | Permalink
 

daveinboca,

crawl back under your manhole cover (heh), bud.

Posted by Tano | September 21, 2007 | 04:10 pm | Permalink
 

Michael,

Do you think Hillary was referring to whether or not she eats at the Y when she says "it is something I have no control over"?

I thought she was referring to what people say about here. The comment before "It's not true" and after "People will say what they want to say" were pretty clearly about what people say about her.

Posted by yetanotherjohn | September 21, 2007 | 04:11 pm | Permalink
 

Triumph how is selling computer, missile and warhead technology to the Chinese in our best interest? I guess Ruby Ridge and the small incident in Texas were examples of how to best care for Americans. I don't think any Bush could be called a Stalinist, but I am not so sure about Hillary.

Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | September 21, 2007 | 05:33 pm | Permalink
 

I heard in high school she was a practicing thespian. And that she even did it in front of other students.

Posted by yetanotherjohn | September 21, 2007 | 05:44 pm | Permalink
 

And the libs keep touting Mrs. Clinton as smart. As even the liberals admit the Clintons' are particularly adept liars, Mrs. Clinton's statemeent has no face value. Howver it does make her sexuality, or lack thereof, into an open issue.

Posted by David L | September 21, 2007 | 08:04 pm | Permalink
 

That's awful news for Hott 4 Hill. (But it does give me an excuse to watch that video again.)

Posted by Beldar | September 21, 2007 | 08:39 pm | Permalink
 

Hillary might not be gay, but her elite team of lesbian assassins who killed Vince Foster certainly were.

Posted by Andy | September 22, 2007 | 11:53 am | Permalink
 

Why is Hillary's sexuality of such interest to so many on the right? Why isn't anyone spreading the rumor that Laura Bush was a LUG?

Posted by Grewgills | September 22, 2007 | 05:08 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog

View blog authority



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.