<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Foreign Policy &#8216;Experience&#8217; Unscheduled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:56:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-310292</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-310292</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey, I hear Elton John is doing some shows for Hillary. Did she help him write “Candle in the Wind”?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, but she did it while dodging sniper fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hey, I hear Elton John is doing some shows for Hillary. Did she help him write “Candle in the Wind”?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, but she did it while dodging sniper fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-310286</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-310286</guid>
		<description>Hey, I hear Elton John is doing some shows for Hillary. Did she help him write &quot;Candle in the Wind&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I hear Elton John is doing some shows for Hillary. Did she help him write "Candle in the Wind"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-310285</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-310285</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was a Reagan Republican. When the Bush family became the dominant force in the GOP, I was far too embarrassed to remain in the party.

Who exactly has forgotten Reagan&#039;s lessons? Government growth and spending are out of control. Government intrusion into the lives of Americans is growing by leaps and bounds. Big brother is watching...

Reagan essentially ended the cold war without firing a shot. Bush has us boggled down in a bloody stalemate in a war we started against a country that did not threaten us. 

I could go on for a while, but I have work to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was a Reagan Republican. When the Bush family became the dominant force in the GOP, I was far too embarrassed to remain in the party.</p>
<p>Who exactly has forgotten Reagan's lessons? Government growth and spending are out of control. Government intrusion into the lives of Americans is growing by leaps and bounds. Big brother is watching...</p>
<p>Reagan essentially ended the cold war without firing a shot. Bush has us boggled down in a bloody stalemate in a war we started against a country that did not threaten us. </p>
<p>I could go on for a while, but I have work to do...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-310249</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-310249</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can you go even a single hour without saying something laughable? You identify me as a member of “the left”. I voted for Reagan twice. I think he was, overall, a good president and a damn good man. There were other factors in winning the cold war, but Reagan sealed the deal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

First of all, what, aside from your words, and your positions, would I have to identify you as such?  You&#039;re fighting the impressions you leave, and nothing more. Whose fault would they be?


And at what point prior to your opening your editor, were you even identified at all in this trhead, much less as a liberal? You seem to be leaping up to defend against an attack which isn&#039;t happening, yet.

(Sigh)Since you insist, however;

So, you were a Reagan Democrat. A goodly number of his voters were. That&#039;s how landslides are had, after all. 

At the same time, I&#039;d say the majority of those... (yourself included, if your writings are any indication)  have lost track of the lesson he taught. So I&#039;m not sure exactly how to credit your claim.... 

Nor do I know how to credit your complaint, for that matter, given you agree Reagan &#039;sealed the deal&#039;. What, exactly, is your problem with what I said, here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can you go even a single hour without saying something laughable? You identify me as a member of “the left”. I voted for Reagan twice. I think he was, overall, a good president and a damn good man. There were other factors in winning the cold war, but Reagan sealed the deal.</p></blockquote>
<p>First of all, what, aside from your words, and your positions, would I have to identify you as such?  You're fighting the impressions you leave, and nothing more. Whose fault would they be?</p>
<p>And at what point prior to your opening your editor, were you even identified at all in this trhead, much less as a liberal? You seem to be leaping up to defend against an attack which isn't happening, yet.</p>
<p>(Sigh)Since you insist, however;</p>
<p>So, you were a Reagan Democrat. A goodly number of his voters were. That's how landslides are had, after all. </p>
<p>At the same time, I'd say the majority of those... (yourself included, if your writings are any indication)  have lost track of the lesson he taught. So I'm not sure exactly how to credit your claim.... </p>
<p>Nor do I know how to credit your complaint, for that matter, given you agree Reagan 'sealed the deal'. What, exactly, is your problem with what I said, here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309691</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309691</guid>
		<description>Bit,

Can you go even a single hour without saying something laughable?  You identify me as a member of &quot;the left&quot;. I voted for Reagan twice. I think he was, overall, a good president and a damn good man. There were other factors in winning the cold war, but Reagan sealed the deal.

Really dude, try and get out of your comic book, black and white world and join us on planet Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit,</p>
<p>Can you go even a single hour without saying something laughable?  You identify me as a member of "the left". I voted for Reagan twice. I think he was, overall, a good president and a damn good man. There were other factors in winning the cold war, but Reagan sealed the deal.</p>
<p>Really dude, try and get out of your comic book, black and white world and join us on planet Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309577</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309577</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thing is, I didn’t SAY that, did I?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Seems to me that you did.  If you had said something like &quot;Liberals are more agreeable to evolution&quot; as a negative attribute, I&#039;d have pointed out to you that evolution is factual truth.  Just because a Liberal agrees with something, doesn&#039;t automatically make that something wrong.

The fact is that while Reagan played a big part in not losing the Cold War, as did many Presidents before him, the Soviet Union collapsed from the inside out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thing is, I didn&rsquo;t SAY that, did I?</p></blockquote>
<p>Seems to me that you did.  If you had said something like "Liberals are more agreeable to evolution" as a negative attribute, I'd have pointed out to you that evolution is factual truth.  Just because a Liberal agrees with something, doesn't automatically make that something wrong.</p>
<p>The fact is that while Reagan played a big part in not losing the Cold War, as did many Presidents before him, the Soviet Union collapsed from the inside out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, but when you say something like “Liberals are more agreeable to the truth”, then someone points out that the truth is still the truth, that is generally a positive for liberals, not a negative.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thing is, I didn&#039;t SAY that, did I?
 
Nor did I mean it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, but when you say something like “Liberals are more agreeable to the truth”, then someone points out that the truth is still the truth, that is generally a positive for liberals, not a negative.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thing is, I didn't SAY that, did I?</p>
<p>Nor did I mean it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309543</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309543</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;… case in point. Sheesh.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yes, but when you say something like &quot;Liberals are more agreeable to the truth&quot;, then someone points out that the truth is still the truth, that is generally a positive for liberals, not a negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>… case in point. Sheesh.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, but when you say something like "Liberals are more agreeable to the truth", then someone points out that the truth is still the truth, that is generally a positive for liberals, not a negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309525</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309525</guid>
		<description>... case in point.
Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... case in point.<br />
Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309467</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309467</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;heheh. I take your point James, but I warn you, the left finds such an idea far more agreeable than the idea that Ronald Reagan won it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Gorbachev decided that it was more important to save Russia than to turn the West into communists.  To say that Reagan or anybody else &quot;won&quot; the war is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>heheh. I take your point James, but I warn you, the left finds such an idea far more agreeable than the idea that Ronald Reagan won it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gorbachev decided that it was more important to save Russia than to turn the West into communists.  To say that Reagan or anybody else "won" the war is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309419</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309419</guid>
		<description>Basically, just like any First Lady.  The response to this, I believe, is that Sen. Clinton made vital and significant contributions but they don&#039;t show up on logs and schedules but were more subtle and off-the-books in nature.

I don&#039;t have any particular problem with that response but I do think it invites the question of why Rosalynn Carter, Nancy Reagan, or Barbara Bush haven&#039;t been touted for the presidency.  Lack of interest on their parts?

I&#039;ve said before that Sen. Clinton needs to be evaluated based on the resume she has rather than the resume she wishes she had and I&#039;m sticking to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, just like any First Lady.  The response to this, I believe, is that Sen. Clinton made vital and significant contributions but they don't show up on logs and schedules but were more subtle and off-the-books in nature.</p>
<p>I don't have any particular problem with that response but I do think it invites the question of why Rosalynn Carter, Nancy Reagan, or Barbara Bush haven't been touted for the presidency.  Lack of interest on their parts?</p>
<p>I've said before that Sen. Clinton needs to be evaluated based on the resume she has rather than the resume she wishes she had and I'm sticking to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/comment-page-1/#comment-309413</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/hillary_clintons_foreign_policy_experience_unscheduled/#comment-309413</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But by this standard, Nancy Reagan won the Cold War.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


heheh. I take your point James, but I warn you, the left finds such an idea far more agreeable than the idea that Ronald Reagan won it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But by this standard, Nancy Reagan won the Cold War.</p></blockquote>
<p>heheh. I take your point James, but I warn you, the left finds such an idea far more agreeable than the idea that Ronald Reagan won it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
