<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Neckline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:18:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139340</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139340</guid>
		<description>[...] Tip:&#160; James Joyner, who has a picture. Warning: You may fall asleep.Last 10 posts by Bithead&#8220;It&#8217;s for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tip:  James Joyner, who has a picture. Warning: You may fall asleep.Last 10 posts by Bithead&#8220;It&#8217;s for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139339</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Let&#039;s be grateful that Hillary limited her allure to the neckline and spared us the mini skirt or hot pants! :0&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The &quot;mashed potatoes in shoes&quot; look ain&#039;t cuttin&#039; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let's be grateful that Hillary limited her allure to the neckline and spared us the mini skirt or hot pants! :0</p></blockquote>
<p>The "mashed potatoes in shoes" look ain't cuttin' it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139322</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139322</guid>
		<description>...she just looks tired...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...she just looks tired...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lunacy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139313</link>
		<dc:creator>lunacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139313</guid>
		<description>Well, as a middle aged women, I can tell you that there is a lot of discussion of professional attire these days.

It seems that many old school professional ladies think that the influence of MTV and other sources had led to an overly relaxed attitude toward cleavage and hemlines in both young, middle and old women. There is hardly a day that goes by where some lady in the office isn&#039;t discussing some weather woman&#039;s skirt or some actresses décolletage. Apparently there is all together too much flesh being shown in inappropriate contexts and at inappropriate ages. Too young or too old being the greatest of sins. 

Let&#039;s be grateful that Hillary limited her allure to the neckline and spared us the mini skirt or hot pants! :0

The consensus in our office is that women of a certain age, which Hillary has surely passed, should not display cleavage in a work environment, as Hillary certainly is.

Perhaps Ghivan is as obsessed with this burning issue as the hens in my office.

I&#039;m not sure I would have even noticed it in this photo unless it had been pointed out to be, but for what it&#039;s worth...yes, the neckline is too low for both her age and her position.

L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as a middle aged women, I can tell you that there is a lot of discussion of professional attire these days.</p>
<p>It seems that many old school professional ladies think that the influence of MTV and other sources had led to an overly relaxed attitude toward cleavage and hemlines in both young, middle and old women. There is hardly a day that goes by where some lady in the office isn't discussing some weather woman's skirt or some actresses décolletage. Apparently there is all together too much flesh being shown in inappropriate contexts and at inappropriate ages. Too young or too old being the greatest of sins. </p>
<p>Let's be grateful that Hillary limited her allure to the neckline and spared us the mini skirt or hot pants! :0</p>
<p>The consensus in our office is that women of a certain age, which Hillary has surely passed, should not display cleavage in a work environment, as Hillary certainly is.</p>
<p>Perhaps Ghivan is as obsessed with this burning issue as the hens in my office.</p>
<p>I'm not sure I would have even noticed it in this photo unless it had been pointed out to be, but for what it's worth...yes, the neckline is too low for both her age and her position.</p>
<p>L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139284</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139284</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/people/col/pagl/2001/02/28/bush/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I am reminded of 2001: (Emph is mine)&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;As an early admirer of the Clintons who was shocked awake by the 1993 healthcare fiasco and other scandals (see the transcripts of two 1994 CNN &quot;Crossfire&quot; shows, reprinted in &quot;Vamps &amp; Tramps,&quot; where I defended Clinton accuser Paula Jones and argued that Hillary &quot;hides from accountability&quot;), &lt;strong&gt;I strongly feel that Hillary has always benefited from a weird residual sexism. Special treatment is still protectively accorded middle-aged heterosexual women by supposedly egalitarian journalists whose brains go soft when Hillary, who&#039;s as butch as they come, turns on her pink estrogen light. It&#039;s the manipulative tyranny of the mother imago. &lt;/strong&gt;
But Hillary has already paid a high price for her willful blurring of the ethical borderline. Her maiden Senate speech two weeks ago, &lt;strong&gt;which had been glowingly projected by starry-eyed telejournalists last fall as sure to draw worldwide attention as her first step toward the presidency,&lt;/strong&gt; was sparsely attended and largely ignored by both the press and her fellow senators because of boiling controversies over pardons, furniture and flatware after the Clintons&#039; chaotic decampment from public housing.
--Camille Paglia &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Same game, different cycle.
 
Out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://archive.salon.com/people/col/pagl/2001/02/28/bush/index.html" rel="nofollow">I am reminded of 2001: (Emph is mine)</a></p>
<blockquote><p>As an early admirer of the Clintons who was shocked awake by the 1993 healthcare fiasco and other scandals (see the transcripts of two 1994 CNN "Crossfire" shows, reprinted in "Vamps &amp; Tramps," where I defended Clinton accuser Paula Jones and argued that Hillary "hides from accountability"), <strong>I strongly feel that Hillary has always benefited from a weird residual sexism. Special treatment is still protectively accorded middle-aged heterosexual women by supposedly egalitarian journalists whose brains go soft when Hillary, who's as butch as they come, turns on her pink estrogen light. It's the manipulative tyranny of the mother imago. </strong><br />
But Hillary has already paid a high price for her willful blurring of the ethical borderline. Her maiden Senate speech two weeks ago, <strong>which had been glowingly projected by starry-eyed telejournalists last fall as sure to draw worldwide attention as her first step toward the presidency,</strong> was sparsely attended and largely ignored by both the press and her fellow senators because of boiling controversies over pardons, furniture and flatware after the Clintons' chaotic decampment from public housing.<br />
--Camille Paglia </p></blockquote>
<p>Same game, different cycle.</p>
<p>Out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139267</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139267</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Uh . . . no. And not just because it’s Hillary Clinton, either. That’s not exactly a risquée outfit, is it? I’m no great fan of the junior senator from New York but, really, this is a non-story.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She deserves serious scorn for the hideousness of the outfit--she looks like she would fit in on the cast of &quot;Saved By the Bell&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Uh . . . no. And not just because it&rsquo;s Hillary Clinton, either. That&rsquo;s not exactly a risquée outfit, is it? I&rsquo;m no great fan of the junior senator from New York but, really, this is a non-story.</p></blockquote>
<p>She deserves serious scorn for the hideousness of the outfit--she looks like she would fit in on the cast of "Saved By the Bell"!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Mark English</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139259</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Mark English</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Hillary is not being attacked my Elizabeth for being too lady like by wearing pink....

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised that Hillary is not being attacked my Elizabeth for being too lady like by wearing pink....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaded</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/hillary_clintons_neckline/comment-page-1/#comment-139256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/hillary_clintons_neckline/#comment-139256</guid>
		<description>and that it is a sunken chest really is the more offensive part, damn lady cover it up:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and that it is a sunken chest really is the more offensive part, damn lady cover it up:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
