Comments on: Holocaust Museum Shooter Aiming at Weekly Standard?

By: pylon

pylon — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:32:31 +0000

I suspect he had the address because he figured he'd be asked for an interview by Fred Barnes.

By: Did The Holocaust Memorial Museum Shooter Have The Weekly Standard’s William Kristol Included On His Hit List? | THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:18:32 +0000

[...] OR “Right” politically speaking; James Joyner of Outside The Beltway says “this makes the story even wierder“; Wonkette says “Anti-Semitism” is a “fancy new word” for Jew [...]

By: An Interested Party

An Interested Party — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:46:08 +0000

A very sensible response to some conservatives who are acting a little defense over all of this...

By: just me

just me — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:35:09 +0000

I think he was a nut. And the kind of nut that might do something, but without a 24/7 watch on the nut it is hard to say when or where, because they are a nut in multiple areas.

I don't think you can blame any one party or political movement on this kind of nuttery either.

By: Eric Florack

Eric Florack — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:43:34 +0000

A valid point, Furhead.
Perhaps the trick here isn't so much to understand it all as much as it is to identify the pattern.

By: PD Shaw

PD Shaw — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:10:09 +0000

One must always struggle with maintaining a respectable level of paranoia.

By: Furhead

Furhead — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:36:01 +0000

As someone noted in the other thread, von Brunn was anti-government (anti-everything, really), and many anti-goverment types were against the wars. The neocons tended to be on the other side of that argument.

But honestly, this guy was crazy, and trying to work out all of his reasoning might be futile and pointless.

By: Eric Florack

Eric Florack — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:28:26 +0000

Hmm. It is online, though, James, with several references I've seen to "neocon' being code for Jew" in his vernacular. Still doesn't make much sense, but at least it's consistant.