Comments on: HOT PINK LEISURE SUITS

By: Matthew

Matthew — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

Let's not forget South Carolina, too. Imagine Marston's outrage if DeLay had called Dean "a bit too light in the loafers to fill President Bush's shoes."

By: Paul

Paul — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

What the Hell???

I read the top half the speech a few days ago and almost died laughing. I guess I was wearing my tin foil hat and missed the anti-gay undertones.

Good Greif!

I remember the 70's complete with (yes) hot pink and (gag) purple leisure suits.

But the irony of ironys is this "Keep it up, then. And as some folks in your base smirk over such not-so-subtle invocations of anti-gay animus, the rest of the country will turn away from you in shame."

Quite the contrary, for over a decade now, the country has been turning away from Democrats who see racists and homophobes behind every tree.

The guy is just nutz.

By: Signifying Nothing

Signifying Nothing — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

Hot pink leisure suits = gay bashing?
James Joyner thinks it’s mildly amusing. Brett Marston thinks it’s gay bashing. What is it? A quote from a speech by House majority leader Tom...

---