working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

How to Pronounce ‘2010′

The gang at Esquire give some thought to a question that will soon be everywhere: How will we pronounce the year 2010?

2010Twenty ten Suggested.

Two thousand ten Eh.

Two zero one zero Amusing but impractical.

Two oh ten Come on.

Ten Nah.

Really, the first two are the only plausible options.  My preference is for the first.  During the last century, we pronounced years as nineteen-seventy, nineteen-eighty-four, and so forth and I’m guessing we’ll do that again now that the aughts are about over.

Aside from it rolling off the tongue somewhat more easily, this approach has another major advantage.  It’s been a decade since people advocating progress could exclaim, “It’s the nineteen-(insert-decade-here), for God’s sakes!”

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

Zero One Zero, number six two remains silent...

Posted by G.A.Phillips | October 19, 2009 | 01:10 pm | Permalink
 

Do you say "Two thousand and nine" or "Twenty oh nine?"

Posted by DC Loser | October 19, 2009 | 01:14 pm | Permalink
 

I grew up in the 1956-7-8 cohort. 57 for me.

My friend Russell said he'd never see 2000. And he didn't. AIDS.

I'll go with twenty-ten.

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 01:34 pm | Permalink
 

Pronounce it any way you want. This “we all must be uniform” is B.S. Lighten up Francis. Heh heh,

Anyway the first two will be typically the way most will say it with a variation on the second where some will throw in the implied “and” by saying two thousand and 10. It will most likely last until 2100.

Posted by Wayne | October 19, 2009 | 01:46 pm | Permalink
 

Do you say "Two thousand and nine" or "Twenty oh nine?"

The former. I don't know anyone who says the latter. Twenty-oh-nine is awkward and twenty-nine is confusing.

My strong guess, though, is that it'll change with the non-aught decades. But maybe not. Most people are saying "Two thousand and twelve" rather than "twenty-twelve" when referring to the next presidential election.

Posted by James Joyner | October 19, 2009 | 01:49 pm | Permalink
 

Because I am no longer in journalism (yea!), it's not my problem. But we now are in the 21st century, and things change.

I'll still go with twenty-ten. You're right, Dr. Joyner. Now is the time to roll over.

When I read history books I read nineteen-oh-eight or whatever.

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 02:10 pm | Permalink
 

How about 'Two years and counting down'. Or, it could be done in days, if you're feeling effete.

After the 2012 apocalypse, we can start counting upwards again...

Posted by John Burgess | October 19, 2009 | 02:22 pm | Permalink
 

Do you pronounce that twenty-twelve ot two thousand and twelve, Mr Burgess?

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 02:28 pm | Permalink
 

Slow news day?

Posted by charles austin | October 19, 2009 | 02:31 pm | Permalink
 

"Aught Ten" (there's a zero in there)

Posted by Douglas | October 19, 2009 | 02:37 pm | Permalink
 

How do you deal with dates, Mr. Austin?

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 02:39 pm | Permalink
 

I say two-thousand one . . . etc.

I blame Stanley Kubrick. Living in the two-thousands is much more important and exciting than living in the nineteen hundreds or seventeen hundreds or even the twenty-one hundreds. This is the new millenia. Every time you say two thousand, it's like the future is here. None of these boring number combinations that sound like a street address.

(Side note: I was watching a new tv show last night that ended with a segue into the screen for twentieth century fox. I thought they were going to switch to the twenty-first century?)

Posted by PD Shaw | October 19, 2009 | 03:27 pm | Permalink
 

So people said in 1900, Shaw.

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 03:33 pm | Permalink
 

But did they say one-thousand nine-hundred? Maybe, the essential difference is that two-thousand is much shorter and cleaner.

But I'm shilling for a better future. When I look back at the nineteen hundreds I think of two world wars, the Great Depression, the Cold War and the spectre of nuclear annihilation, genocide and democide, Jim Crow, the Spanish Flu and AIDS. Time to turn the page and hope for uninteresting times.

Posted by PD Shaw | October 19, 2009 | 04:06 pm | Permalink
 

How do you deal with dates, Mr. Austin?

Not entirely sure how to answer that, I guess it depends on context. I prefer unambiguity as much as possible in a say what you mean, mean what you say kind of way. In this particular case I would side with the precedent of Zager and Evans and go with "twenty-ten."

Posted by charles austin | October 19, 2009 | 04:13 pm | Permalink
 

I'm with you darlin', but it didn't start all that well.

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 04:14 pm | Permalink
 

Poop, Mr. Austin. You knew your context.

In the other sense, I prefer Dutch for at least a time or two.

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 04:29 pm | Permalink
 

And we're all carrying on as a non-Judaic bunch. It's 5770 by that calendar.

Who has the Hindu calendar?

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 04:40 pm | Permalink
 

I'm with PD Shaw. I didn't expect folks to say Twenty Hundred in 2000, but we spent 30+ years waiting so we could say the year was Two Thousand One.

100 years earlier folks said Nineteen O One and moved on. I've often said Twenty O One (or two, or three, or nine) and so has Charles Osgood on Sunday Morning, IIRC. It's a heck of a lot easier than the much more awkward two thousand and "x".

Can't wait for Twenty Ten, which is much easier to say than Two Thousand Ten, and when we will finally get out of this silly rut

Pete

Posted by Peter | October 19, 2009 | 04:57 pm | Permalink
 

Janis: In real life, I say 'twenty-twelve,' but to stay in character, I should be counting down to 2012, e.g., 'Fourteen months and counting...'

It's 1430 Hijri, btw.

Posted by John Burgess | October 19, 2009 | 05:03 pm | Permalink
 

No worries, it will be Year Zero again soon.

Posted by charles austin | October 19, 2009 | 05:49 pm | Permalink
 

Is that the Mayan calendar, Mr. Austin?

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 05:51 pm | Permalink
 

No, just a reference to your garden variety Year Zero utopians.

Posted by charles austin | October 19, 2009 | 07:29 pm | Permalink
 

I expect to say "twenty ten," as that's how I've been thinking of all the post-double-aught years anyway.

I expect 2010 will be transitional for most, but that the attraction of getting away with saying "twenty-eleven" the following year will bring pretty much everyone into line eventually.

Posted by McGehee | October 19, 2009 | 07:37 pm | Permalink
 

“"twenty-eleven" the following year will bring pretty much everyone into line eventually”

There will be plenty in 2012 that will be saying “two thousand twelve” or “two thousand and twelve”. I’m not sure why that sounds so odd to some of you. Most likely due to where you live than anything.

If one goes by the way people typically say numbers and as already stated there is some variance, two thousand and what not will be used until it becomes twenty-one hundred, twenty-one hundred and what not, or the 21 and what not. Ask when the Civil war started and you will get either eighteen sixty one, 18 hundred 61, or 18 hundred and sixty one.

I’m not sure why there is a discussion of it having to be said one way or another, or if it will be said one way or another. To me it is obviously that it will be said in many different ways as it always has been. The various ways it will be said and which is more popular is some interest but amazes me that some will think it will be only said one way.

Posted by Wayne | October 19, 2009 | 08:42 pm | Permalink
 

It's all trivial, except to Dr. Joyner.

He married in what, 2005, 2006?

He had a baby girl in what, 2008?

They didn't have the baby in twenty-ought-something.

Katie was born in two-thousand and what?

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 09:01 pm | Permalink
 

Katie was born in two-thousand and what?

Last New Years Eve. But I think everyone calls it "Two thousand," "Two thousand and one," and so forth.

Posted by James Joyner | October 19, 2009 | 09:05 pm | Permalink
 

I stand corrected. How is Katie?

Posted by Janis Gore | October 19, 2009 | 09:12 pm | Permalink
 

This is easy, we in America will listen to how everyone else says it, and then say it differently. Like aluminum and the metric system.

Posted by This Guy | October 20, 2009 | 10:26 am | Permalink
 

How is Katie?

She's doing great. Growing like a weed, just about walking, and otherwise doing what she's supposed to, including keeping us up nights.

Posted by James Joyner | October 20, 2009 | 11:58 am | Permalink
 

There will be plenty in 2012 that will be saying “two thousand twelve” or “two thousand and twelve”.

Someone recently said "not many" presidents seeking re-election lose. I pointed out that two of the four living ex-presidents were defeated for re-election, and politely suggested he define "not many."

So, please define "plenty." ;-)

Posted by McGehee | October 20, 2009 | 12:04 pm | Permalink
 

Plenty would be 10% or greater that will use it at least once in a year. As for the above statement, I suspect the number will be greater than 50% that uses it at least once in a year with 30% or higher using it frequently. Frequently meaning several times in a year.

So what is your “pretty much everyone” breakdown and your percentages?

Posted by Wayne | October 20, 2009 | 01:04 pm | Permalink
 

Plenty would be 10% or greater that will use it at least once in a year. As for the above statement, I suspect the number will be greater than 50% that uses it at least once in a year with 30% or higher using it frequently. Frequently meaning several times in a year.

I look forward to your survey figures at the end of the time period in question. Have you been offered any grant money?

So what is your “pretty much everyone” breakdown and your percentages?

100% of people who won't be spending the next few years collecting data on how many people are saying "two thousand and twelve."

Do me a favor and include that in your survey.

Posted by McGehee | October 20, 2009 | 10:45 pm | Permalink
 

Mc
I thought for a minute that you may actually be interest in a discussion and wanted definitions of words we use so we would be on the same page. Obviously not. You were just being snide and condescending and expecting from others what you are unwilling to give. Anyone who thinks 100% will never say "two thousand and twelve" is showing how reasonable of a person they really are.

Posted by Wayne | October 21, 2009 | 01:02 pm | Permalink
 

Twenty-Ten.
Most national newscasters already say "twenty-xxx"
The Vancouver, London, and Rio Olympics are all officially "twenty".

'Two thousand' is for counting numbers, not for naming years. $2,010 is 'two thousand ten dollars. Year 2010 is 'twenty-ten'. (Notice no comma to separate the thousands digits. Using no comma suggests hundreds - such as twenty hundred, just like last decase was nineteen hundred.)

Posted by Dan Golus | October 27, 2009 | 08:27 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.