Huge Explosion Rocks Afghan Capital
 |
James Joyner | Wednesday, April 19, 2006 |
AP trumpets a headline that “Huge Explosion Rocks Afghan Capital.” Despite the hugeness, nobody was killed and not much damage was done, although a security guard was injured.
Update: AFP adds that, “A powerful rocket exploded in a television station compound near the US embassy and NATO headquarters in the Afghan capital, injuring a Nepalese security guard, police said. The massive blast from the ‘very strong’ rocket sent shrapnel flying hundreds of meters (yards) from the state-run Kabul TV and radio building, an official at Kabul police command told AFP.”
The BBC, in typical British fashion, eschews the modifiers: “A rocket has exploded in the Afghan capital Kabul, in the grounds of the state-run television station. It landed at about 2300 local time (1830 GMT) in an area near the UN special representative’s compound, sending up a plume of smoke.”
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later
- Oklahoma High Schoolers Are Very Familiar With George Washington, Thanks
- Was Fort Hood Massacre ‘Terrorism’?
- Making Jobs More Expensive
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- Update on the Fort Hood Massacre
- OTB Latenight – Soft Cell
A "very strong" rocket? Does some arms maker have "very weak" rockets on offer? Not that throwing shrapnel a couple hundred meters/yards sounds like much more than a hand grenade.
Surely someone will complain that the BBC, being on the side of the terrorists, is trying to make the rocket sound friendlier. The Reuters will use quote-marks ('A "rocket" exploded in the Kabul') and it's off to the blogosphere races.
If you don't call it a homicide rocket, you're objectively pro-terrorist.
Comments are Closed
