working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

ICANN Denies .xxx Domain Class

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has turned down the idea of creating an “.xxx” domain, thwarting the hopes that pornography could find its way to the Internet.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

And a good thing too. Using my super power of obviousness, I think that the Internet would be ripe for exploitation of pornography if the Internet corporation was not ever vigilant.

Just as a thought exercise, imagine if the Internet corporation did impose a G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17 rating system on the Internet. Add in the reason behind the rating. No censorship per se, but you could easily set your filter to what you would and wouldn't allow. Like the current movie system it would have its flaws, but overall it could work pretty well.

Posted by yetanotherjohn | March 30, 2007 | 11:57 am | Permalink
 

"thwarting the hopes that pornography could find its way to the Internet."

Are you kidding? You have to be kidding. Seventy percent of the revenue generated on the internet is from online pornography. You can't be that behind the times.

Posted by thomas | March 30, 2007 | 12:41 pm | Permalink
 

Gee it seems to me that we dodged a bullet here. The decision clearly will keep porno off the Internet. On a more serious note, I'm glad that porn isn't restricted to domain xxx. The quality ofDanish porn is way better than German pron and American porn. If we had gone with xxx then how could I know what to expect? Besides American porn sites are littered with malware and viruses. Not the Danish! Their sites are clean and green, so to speak.

Posted by TheHat | March 30, 2007 | 12:45 pm | Permalink
 

What's that saying -

If there was no porn on the internet there'd be only 1 site and it would be a petition to allow porn back on the internet.

Like everyone with an IQ above 5 I am not into porn but think as long as its kept from kids there's no reason to ban it.

Posted by Steph | March 30, 2007 | 01:26 pm | Permalink
 

Like everyone with an IQ above 5 I am not into porn but think as long as its kept from kids there’s no reason to ban it.

Dang, and I always thought I had a higher IQ...

Posted by Another Matt | March 30, 2007 | 02:22 pm | Permalink
 

Steph,

I think the idea is that porn sites would have .xxx as part of their address. Just like government sites have .gov, non-profits have .org, etc. I don't think they were trying to put all the porn on one site (though that would pose some interesting web coding issues trying to keep the various fetishists happy).

Posted by yetanotherjohn | March 30, 2007 | 04:32 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.