<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Influencers Have Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/influencers_have_influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/influencers_have_influence/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conventional Thinking and Regression to the Mean &#171; Just Above Sunset</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/influencers_have_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-992627</link>
		<dc:creator>Conventional Thinking and Regression to the Mean &#171; Just Above Sunset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33287#comment-992627</guid>
		<description>[...] James Joyner at Outside the Beltway offers this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Joyner at Outside the Beltway offers this: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eneils Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/influencers_have_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-992340</link>
		<dc:creator>Eneils Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33287#comment-992340</guid>
		<description>To me, you have just put forth Marx and Engel&#039;s theory of Dialectic Materialism. Not exactly, but close.
People interpret it differently.

In politics, or any sort of critical thought:
For every thesis put forth, there will arise an antithesis. From the agreement or conflicit resolution of those two, will arise the new thesis. And etc...etc...

The most notable exercising of this theory came in communist China, during the 1960&#039;s, commonly referred to as the people&#039;s revolution. Mao organgized and put forth a band of his fellow communist who appeared to be contesting his regime and ideas.. In esscense, the leaders and instigators were his lackies and fellow commardes.
the common people took to the street to purify their society, to new ideas. Little did they know, they were led and approved of exterminating about twenty million of Mao&#039;s enemies.
Mao took conflicit resolutiohn to a new level.

Bottom line, it works well in a free society, but watch your ass, in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, you have just put forth Marx and Engel's theory of Dialectic Materialism. Not exactly, but close.<br />
People interpret it differently.</p>
<p>In politics, or any sort of critical thought:<br />
For every thesis put forth, there will arise an antithesis. From the agreement or conflicit resolution of those two, will arise the new thesis. And etc...etc...</p>
<p>The most notable exercising of this theory came in communist China, during the 1960's, commonly referred to as the people's revolution. Mao organgized and put forth a band of his fellow communist who appeared to be contesting his regime and ideas.. In esscense, the leaders and instigators were his lackies and fellow commardes.<br />
the common people took to the street to purify their society, to new ideas. Little did they know, they were led and approved of exterminating about twenty million of Mao's enemies.<br />
Mao took conflicit resolutiohn to a new level.</p>
<p>Bottom line, it works well in a free society, but watch your ass, in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/influencers_have_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-992318</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33287#comment-992318</guid>
		<description>Is this like the Paris Hilton effect--famous for being famous? Influential for being influential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this like the Paris Hilton effect--famous for being famous? Influential for being influential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
