<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Reporting on Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:21:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-523943</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27433#comment-523943</guid>
		<description>You missed it, grew...

Look again, with a keen eye to the difference between &#039;IS&#039; and &#039;WAS and how the headline I referenced, never really defines which of them is being discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed it, grew...</p>
<p>Look again, with a keen eye to the difference between 'IS' and 'WAS and how the headline I referenced, never really defines which of them is being discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-523934</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27433#comment-523934</guid>
		<description>Bit,
Given Hayden&#039;s statement,
&lt;blockquote&gt;“Today, virtually every major terrorist threat that my agency is aware of has threads back to the tribal areas” along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
what do you think he thinks is the central front in the WOT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit,<br />
Given Hayden's statement,</p>
<blockquote><p>“Today, virtually every major terrorist threat that my agency is aware of has threads back to the tribal areas” along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.</p></blockquote>
<p>what do you think he thinks is the central front in the WOT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-523924</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27433#comment-523924</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the reason is that you are writing for different audiences. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that&#039;s right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think the reason is that you are writing for different audiences. </p></blockquote>
<p>I think that's right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-523916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27433#comment-523916</guid>
		<description>I think the reason is that you are writing for different audiences. Most of the articles you are referring to are writing for general audiences. In that case, they are trying to grab the average reader in the lede.

You are writing for a narrower, more specialized audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason is that you are writing for different audiences. Most of the articles you are referring to are writing for general audiences. In that case, they are trying to grab the average reader in the lede.</p>
<p>You are writing for a narrower, more specialized audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-523885</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27433#comment-523885</guid>
		<description>Of course the coverage of the speech has been laughable at best. Let&#039;s examine, though, the why of it. Says James...
&lt;blockquote&gt;It seemed obvious to me that the “news” was Hayden’s declaration that “Today, virtually every major terrorist threat that my agency is aware of has threads back to the tribal areas” along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. While not exactly shocking to those who have followed the news on the subject, it’s a much more sweeping statement than I’ve seen by someone in a position of authority.Interesting, almost none of the world class beat reporters covering the story led with that&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What ARE they leading with...Walter Pincus at the Washington Post, for example?  
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/13/AR2008111303959.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CIA Chief: Iraq Not Main Front&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;/blockquote&gt;
... and that of course has been the lefty meme all along... that Iraq never WAS the core of the thing. Of course they&#039;re dead wrong in this, but never let here facts stop you. To the credit, by the way, of Pincus, he uses the words....
&lt;blockquote&gt;CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said yesterday that al-Qaeda remains the single greatest threat to the United States but that Iraq is no longer the central front in the broader war on terrorism&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The headline, though, which Pincus himself doubtless didn&#039;t write, meshes nicely on it&#039;s face with the meme the left has been trying all along to sell. Go ahead, gang, and tell me how we&#039;re not STILL being manipulated, here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the coverage of the speech has been laughable at best. Let's examine, though, the why of it. Says James...</p>
<blockquote><p>It seemed obvious to me that the “news” was Hayden&rsquo;s declaration that “Today, virtually every major terrorist threat that my agency is aware of has threads back to the tribal areas” along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. While not exactly shocking to those who have followed the news on the subject, it&rsquo;s a much more sweeping statement than I&rsquo;ve seen by someone in a position of authority.Interesting, almost none of the world class beat reporters covering the story led with that</p></blockquote>
<p>What ARE they leading with...Walter Pincus at the Washington Post, for example?  </p>
<blockquote><p>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/13/AR2008111303959.html" rel="nofollow">CIA Chief: Iraq Not Main Front</a>
 </p></blockquote>
<p>... and that of course has been the lefty meme all along... that Iraq never WAS the core of the thing. Of course they're dead wrong in this, but never let here facts stop you. To the credit, by the way, of Pincus, he uses the words....</p>
<blockquote><p>CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said yesterday that al-Qaeda remains the single greatest threat to the United States but that Iraq is no longer the central front in the broader war on terrorism</p></blockquote>
<p>The headline, though, which Pincus himself doubtless didn't write, meshes nicely on it's face with the meme the left has been trying all along to sell. Go ahead, gang, and tell me how we're not STILL being manipulated, here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/intelligent_reporting_on_intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-523832</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27433#comment-523832</guid>
		<description>Well, i&#039;m sure Hayden will be gone come January so what he says not is moot to the mediaObamateam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i'm sure Hayden will be gone come January so what he says not is moot to the mediaObamateam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
