The only thing I can think of is that Indymedia is linking to him at various times. I must admit that it has calmed down in the last month or so from its BushHitler halcyon days.

Many Democrats still feel Alger Hiss got a raw deal, contrary to recently declassified Vernona information.

As the charge of "Saddam coddling", I really don't know of anything more the Democratic party could have done to aid him any further, other than shipping him weapons.

Terrorist lovers might be a bit strong, but when they ask dopey questions like "why do they hate us?" after 9-11, it did make them sound a bit weak on the subject.

But hey, what do I know. I'm just another brown shirt that wants to oppress. :)

I do agree that vitriolic mud-slinging is rarely productive.

In the first Gulf War, I waited to see if any Bush/Repub would apologize for arming the nutcase Saddam. I waited in Gulf War II for the same apology. We give him arms and then want to wipe him out -- both at taxpayer expense. Where's the admission Rumsfeld was wrong to shake his hand in the 80's? It's the Repubs who consistently backed Saddam. The Democrats always opposed the SOB.

I should give Totten's site more of a looksee. I've seen his name bandied about but haven't been there much.

Nice blog by the way.

and...

That was VERY funny John! :)

you're fooling yourself if you think Bush and his people didn't ask that same question.

Perhaps they could have increased his credits with the Commodity Credit Corporation from $500,000,000 to $1,000,000,000 after the gassing of the Kurds in Halabja - oops, that was George H. W. Bush. My source: Samantha Power´s A Problem From Hell.