<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa Caucus to Decide 2008 Nominations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iowa_caucus_to_decide_2008_nominations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iowa_caucus_to_decide_2008_nominations/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:01:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iowa_caucus_to_decide_2008_nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-132396</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/06/iowa_caucus_to_decide_2008_nominations/#comment-132396</guid>
		<description>I think Iowa and New Hampshire will still remain relevant-especially given that the candidates are currently crawling all over the place, although the democrats have hit my town much more than any of the GOP ones-Biden was here for our community day (his campaign was handing out free water, I didn&#039;t feel too guilty taking some).  Edwards is apparently doing something down at the high school today.

Who hasn&#039;t been up here much though are Obama and Hillary-so it may be that some of the third place and back candidates are working NH while the front runners are concentrating elsewhere.

I actually think what is going to happen is that some of the smaller states voting on the 5th are the states that will in the end get shafted by the heavy loaded day-the tier I candidates will focus on the big state, while some of the tier II candidates may try to work votes in the smaller states, but it probably won&#039;t do them much good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Iowa and New Hampshire will still remain relevant-especially given that the candidates are currently crawling all over the place, although the democrats have hit my town much more than any of the GOP ones-Biden was here for our community day (his campaign was handing out free water, I didn't feel too guilty taking some).  Edwards is apparently doing something down at the high school today.</p>
<p>Who hasn't been up here much though are Obama and Hillary-so it may be that some of the third place and back candidates are working NH while the front runners are concentrating elsewhere.</p>
<p>I actually think what is going to happen is that some of the smaller states voting on the 5th are the states that will in the end get shafted by the heavy loaded day-the tier I candidates will focus on the big state, while some of the tier II candidates may try to work votes in the smaller states, but it probably won't do them much good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
