<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq, Five Years On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_five_years_on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_five_years_on/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:10:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_five_years_on/comment-page-1/#comment-306319</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/iraq_five_years_on/#comment-306319</guid>
		<description>Five years after the war started lets not just look at what George Bush said, lets also look at what Bill Clinton said a few years earlier.

Below is a link to Bill Clintons transcripts as to why he bombed Iraq in 1998. However you can Google it up yourself. Just type in Clinton transcript, 1998, Saddam Hussein, WMD, Iraq etc. You will get several news agencies versions of the transcript, as well as the transcript of a few months earlier of Clintons address to the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff? which goes into other details. 

These documents blow liberals away. They have little latitude for their present day arguments after Billy-Bobs own words. 

One wonders why the media has so totally ignored them, and even in some cases tried to sweep them under the rug (of course, we all know the answer to that one). 

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html 

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/

 
Of course the above transcripts show just how naïve Obama is, and how inexperienced he is. Even though it is popular media driven opinion that the war is wrong, if Obama was sharp enough he would have seen through the medias indoctrination. Is it possible that Bill &amp; Hillary both approve of the war? Maybe both the Clintons like using international affairs to play domestic politics, and that is why they Now claim the war is wrong (after all, she did vote for it)!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five years after the war started lets not just look at what George Bush said, lets also look at what Bill Clinton said a few years earlier.</p>
<p>Below is a link to Bill Clintons transcripts as to why he bombed Iraq in 1998. However you can Google it up yourself. Just type in Clinton transcript, 1998, Saddam Hussein, WMD, Iraq etc. You will get several news agencies versions of the transcript, as well as the transcript of a few months earlier of Clintons address to the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff? which goes into other details. </p>
<p>These documents blow liberals away. They have little latitude for their present day arguments after Billy-Bobs own words. </p>
<p>One wonders why the media has so totally ignored them, and even in some cases tried to sweep them under the rug (of course, we all know the answer to that one). </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/</a></p>
<p>Of course the above transcripts show just how naïve Obama is, and how inexperienced he is. Even though it is popular media driven opinion that the war is wrong, if Obama was sharp enough he would have seen through the medias indoctrination. Is it possible that Bill &amp; Hillary both approve of the war? Maybe both the Clintons like using international affairs to play domestic politics, and that is why they Now claim the war is wrong (after all, she did vote for it)!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_five_years_on/comment-page-1/#comment-304137</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/iraq_five_years_on/#comment-304137</guid>
		<description>The Iraqi war situation is compounded by the unanswered allowance of liberal control in defining the subject -namely that war is clean, its nuances controllable (like a puppet) and that one side wins. Fact, war always has at least two losers and no victors -just losers and worse losers.

The other issue the libs control is the silence about the consequence of ignoring what happens when you don&#039;t confront evil at your doorstep that has announced its intentions, and has already hurt you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iraqi war situation is compounded by the unanswered allowance of liberal control in defining the subject -namely that war is clean, its nuances controllable (like a puppet) and that one side wins. Fact, war always has at least two losers and no victors -just losers and worse losers.</p>
<p>The other issue the libs control is the silence about the consequence of ignoring what happens when you don't confront evil at your doorstep that has announced its intentions, and has already hurt you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_five_years_on/comment-page-1/#comment-303525</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/iraq_five_years_on/#comment-303525</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Incredibly, Congress will soon vote on another $102 billion blank check&lt;/em&gt;

He keeps using that word, but I do not think it means what he thinks it means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Incredibly, Congress will soon vote on another $102 billion blank check</em></p>
<p>He keeps using that word, but I do not think it means what he thinks it means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
