<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRAQ PROGRESS REPORT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/comment-page-1/#comment-3662</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2662#comment-3662</guid>
		<description>Especially considering it has been, what, about three months since we took control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially considering it has been, what, about three months since we took control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/comment-page-1/#comment-3663</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2662#comment-3663</guid>
		<description>The second half of the Barone column, where it lists accomplishments... fair enough.

However, the phrase that permeates the first half of the article: &quot;According to Chalabi...&quot; and &quot;talking to Chalabi afterward...&quot; pretty much disqualifies that column as being anything other than a puff piece for Chalabi heading up a provisional government. Hasn&#039;t that guy ruined enough reporters&#039; (e.g. Judith Miller) lives with his fairy tales?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second half of the Barone column, where it lists accomplishments... fair enough.</p>
<p>However, the phrase that permeates the first half of the article: "According to Chalabi..." and "talking to Chalabi afterward..." pretty much disqualifies that column as being anything other than a puff piece for Chalabi heading up a provisional government. Hasn't that guy ruined enough reporters' (e.g. Judith Miller) lives with his fairy tales?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/comment-page-1/#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2662#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>You make a fair point.  Chalabi definitely has an agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a fair point.  Chalabi definitely has an agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/comment-page-1/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2662#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know...  Maybe it&#039;s just me, but he doesn&#039;t sound like the most reliable source about anything in Iraq (Miller, etc.).  Of course, what he says could very well be true.  But I&#039;d want a corroborating source to confirm it.  If he&#039;s the only source, telling the &quot;contrarian truth&quot;, then I think we can safely say we&#039;ve already seen how this movie ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know...  Maybe it's just me, but he doesn't sound like the most reliable source about anything in Iraq (Miller, etc.).  Of course, what he says could very well be true.  But I'd want a corroborating source to confirm it.  If he's the only source, telling the "contrarian truth", then I think we can safely say we've already seen how this movie ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_progress_report/comment-page-1/#comment-3666</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2662#comment-3666</guid>
		<description>While the above points about Chalabi are well taken, that list his hardly his.

It is basically the same list Cheney and Bremer are reading... Unless.... It&#039;s a conspiracy!

Quick... Call the BBC.

Paul



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the above points about Chalabi are well taken, that list his hardly his.</p>
<p>It is basically the same list Cheney and Bremer are reading... Unless.... It's a conspiracy!</p>
<p>Quick... Call the BBC.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
