<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq War and Female Casualties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/comment-page-1/#comment-82885</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/#comment-82885</guid>
		<description>everybody serves. try NOT paying your taxes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everybody serves. try NOT paying your taxes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/comment-page-1/#comment-82773</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 11:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/#comment-82773</guid>
		<description>First, all women in the military, including those wounded in action, should be praised for doing something most people don&#039;t do: serve their country.

From the source article:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Should women go into a combat situation? We&#039;re already there. It&#039;s a moot point,â?? said Army Capt. Carmen Lugo-Martinezâ?¦
â?¦She said women were doing many jobs once done solely by men - and facing the same risks.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

O.K. so why then the differences in requirements for female and male soldiers?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&#039;I think women have some physical limitations, but if they can drive a truck and fly a chopper, they can serve their country,&#039;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, o.k.  A woman CAN fly a helicopter, drive a tank, or whatever else.  But should she be promoted ahead of her male peers because she can WALK the 2-mile run and pass?  Is there any reason in a woman&#039;s physiology that she cannot do as many situps as a man?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Added Lugo-Martinez: &#039;It&#039;s honor, duty, loyalty and country. I don&#039;t think women are limited in the roles they can perform in the service.&#039;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely.  So why not step up to the plate.  Women are selected for flight school and other trainaing programs, promoted, and ultimately further their careers and get paid more based on their performance.  Why there is a different standard for men and women is beyond me.  I believe the real women warriors out there would want it to be that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, all women in the military, including those wounded in action, should be praised for doing something most people don't do: serve their country.</p>
<p>From the source article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Should women go into a combat situation? We're already there. It's a moot point,â?? said Army Capt. Carmen Lugo-Martinezâ?¦<br />
â?¦She said women were doing many jobs once done solely by men - and facing the same risks.</p></blockquote>
<p>O.K. so why then the differences in requirements for female and male soldiers?</p>
<blockquote><p>'I think women have some physical limitations, but if they can drive a truck and fly a chopper, they can serve their country,'</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, o.k.  A woman CAN fly a helicopter, drive a tank, or whatever else.  But should she be promoted ahead of her male peers because she can WALK the 2-mile run and pass?  Is there any reason in a woman's physiology that she cannot do as many situps as a man?</p>
<blockquote><p>Added Lugo-Martinez: 'It's honor, duty, loyalty and country. I don't think women are limited in the roles they can perform in the service.'</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely.  So why not step up to the plate.  Women are selected for flight school and other trainaing programs, promoted, and ultimately further their careers and get paid more based on their performance.  Why there is a different standard for men and women is beyond me.  I believe the real women warriors out there would want it to be that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/comment-page-1/#comment-82739</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 02:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/#comment-82739</guid>
		<description>john wayne would be proud[gacy that is]!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john wayne would be proud[gacy that is]!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy K</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/comment-page-1/#comment-82722</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/#comment-82722</guid>
		<description>&quot;Interestingly, aside from a spike during the Jessica Lynch story, the public has been remarkably uninterested in this issue, accepting the death of female troops as natural as that of males.&quot;

Good. Because it is. Being a soldier is not a &#039;safe&#039; occupation. For either sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Interestingly, aside from a spike during the Jessica Lynch story, the public has been remarkably uninterested in this issue, accepting the death of female troops as natural as that of males."</p>
<p>Good. Because it is. Being a soldier is not a 'safe' occupation. For either sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Going to the Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/comment-page-1/#comment-132691</link>
		<dc:creator>Going to the Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/iraq_war_at_female_casualties/#comment-132691</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Great post over at Outside the Beltway on female casualties in Iraq. Whilethe post notes aside from a spike during the Jessica Lynch story, the public has been remarkably uninterested in this issue, accepting the death of female troops as natural as that of males. In the past, the argument against female soldiers in combat is that America&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Great post over at Outside the Beltway on female casualties in Iraq. Whilethe post notes aside from a spike during the Jessica Lynch story, the public has been remarkably uninterested in this issue, accepting the death of female troops as natural as that of males. In the past, the argument against female soldiers in combat is that America<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
