working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Iraqi Referendum: Should We Stay or Should We Go?

Jonah Goldberg does some extreme noodling and decides that a referendum wherein the Iraqi people voted whether Coalition forces should stay or go would be a splendid idea. Kevin Drum likes it the idea and thinks the “Go” side would win easily. I don’t think that’s true since, as bad as the security picture is now, it would get even worse without Coalition troops to train and augment the fledgling Iraqi forces.

Either way, though, it’s a good idea. Goldberg enumerates eleven reasons why a “Stay” vote would be helpful. As to the alternative, “I can think of no more honorable and face-saving way for U.S. forces to exit Iraq than after a vote of this sort.”

Aside from achieving the aims that took us over there in the first place, presumably. But, certainly, the Iraqi people have the right to ask us to leave. We’ve long said we would do so if that was their wish.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

The next question would it be a straight up popular vote, an electoral college version such as the constitution vote where 3 provinces could hold veto power (and is that veto for staying or going) or is it province by province where we can stay only in provinces that want us?

I like the idea also and would love to see it proposed by the Iraqi Parliament.

Posted by yetanotherjohn | April 21, 2006 | 05:37 pm | Permalink
 

We should also hold these elections in:

South Korea
Japan
Germany
Japan
Italy

And the other half dozen countries we have troops.

Posted by Director Mitch | April 21, 2006 | 08:23 pm | Permalink
 

Well, it's up to the host government (in each of the above cases) to ask us to stay or go. If they want their elected representatives to decide on their own, so be it. If they want to ask their constituents to guide them through a referendum, so be it.

Nothing new here. This could be done now, as it could have been done any time in the past by the government of any country where we have troops stationed.

It's not up to us to dictate how they might go about making such a decision. These suggestions seem a bit presumptuous to me.

Posted by Boyd | April 21, 2006 | 09:53 pm | Permalink
 

Perhaps we should review the arguments pro and con on direct democracy one more time.

Posted by Dave Schuler | April 21, 2006 | 10:26 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.