Oh... and of course the energy thing, seems to me the final nail in Obama's box.

I think everyone in here knows you think that, Anjin.

Well Bit, as the saying goes, "check the score".

364 365-162

I think you can make a pretty strong argument that Obama was not "in trouble" at any time during his campaign, starting from day one.

I think everyone in here knows you think that, Anjin.

So he was at the time, by the numbers, and by his reations.

I think you can make a pretty strong argument that Obama was not "in trouble" at any time during his campaign, starting from day one. They rope-a-doped when the tactic suited them, such as when they suckered McCain into Pennsylvania, a state Obama had locked up, by feigning weakness.

Obama and Axelrod have been playing the game on a higher level than previously seen all along. They took what Howard Dean started and carried it to its logical conclusion. The smartest Republicans, men like Ed Rollins and David Gurgen have given Obama his due, which is only fair, even if you do not support his goals. The small minded of course, will be unable to do so.

What else would you call someone in that position?

With his demonstrated brainpower? Lucky.

He's in trouble and knows it.

So he was at the time, by the numbers, and by his reations.

But, after all, you are easily confused.

Your words, Ajin. Funny how your reaction changes when these roles get reversed.

Obama's been slipping in the polls. He's in trouble and knows it.

Posted by Bithead | October 19, 2008

As comedy bitsy, you rival SNL...

You call Irvin 'the elite', and you call ME confused?

Actully, I was referring to Powell and Buffet as the elite. But, after all, you are easily confused.

Buy all means bit, declare yourself victor again. Like you kept doing when you were telling us about the greatness of Palin...

LOL! You call Irvin 'the elite', and you call ME confused? Step off.

I'm not sure if he called Irvin "elite" or not, but it strikes me that if one is a multi-millionaire with one's own radio show and is in the Pro Foorball Hall of Fame, one is clearly an elite. not the same kind of elite as Powell or Volker, but an elite nonetheless.

What else would you call someone in that position?

Don't think thats what I said.

And as usual, you came to that conclusion the moment you got spanked on it.

Its pretty obvious that the majority of his votes did not come from the elite of the elite, who are, of course, a tiny percentage of the population. Are you really as confused as you sound?

LOL! You call Irvin 'the elite', and you call ME confused? Step off.

But they have the vote, and used it, uneducated and unsuccessful and all! For the Messiah!

Well if you want to get into a demographic pissing contest, Obama won the post grad demo overwhelmingly and this graphic, showing the places in the country that increased support for the GOP over the 2004 vote is telling. Note the dark red in those places in the US known for educational excellence. Sobering indeed.

L've said for a long time now that support for Obama was not based in fact, but rather pure emotion...

And all of the gooey giddiness for Sarah Pailin was based on hard analytic analysis.

The US circulation of newspapers is about 48 million per day. Only if every paper is read by an average of three people would it cover the entire voting population. Of that number, they most likely do not read much more than the sports section anyway. The Editorials and Op Ed would be just too much to take.

But they have the vote, and used it, uneducated and unsuccessful and all! For the Messiah!

More voted this way than there are newspaper subscribers in the nation, I would venture. They actually could tell you what paper they read---none

Well Manning, I subscribe to 0 newspapers. Yet I read about half a dozen a day. The internets are really, really cool...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shHmInLqJuk