<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Anti-Immigration the New Mercantilism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:01:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John S Bolton</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53311</link>
		<dc:creator>John S Bolton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53311</guid>
		<description>We do need to protect against the increase in aggression on the net taxpayer which occurs through mass immigration into a wastrel welfare society. The police are protectionist against the competition in violence.  The military is protectionist against the competition in invasions of rival governments. Drug gangs compete in terms of ruthless violence; this is not competition that anyone but an anarcholibertarian, perhaps would want. Foreigners are different in status; to divert public funds to them is traitorous. How can there be a moral justification for increasing the aggression on the net taxpayer, by importing illiterates by the millions, on to net public subsidy? What explains the need to use ad hominem items like &#039;anti-immigrant&#039;, when one could say patriotic instead? No one is here just to work, unless it were a robot arriving in a crate; imigrants use public services and vote themselves socialist aggression on the net taxpayer, whose existence is ever so conveniently left out of account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do need to protect against the increase in aggression on the net taxpayer which occurs through mass immigration into a wastrel welfare society. The police are protectionist against the competition in violence.  The military is protectionist against the competition in invasions of rival governments. Drug gangs compete in terms of ruthless violence; this is not competition that anyone but an anarcholibertarian, perhaps would want. Foreigners are different in status; to divert public funds to them is traitorous. How can there be a moral justification for increasing the aggression on the net taxpayer, by importing illiterates by the millions, on to net public subsidy? What explains the need to use ad hominem items like 'anti-immigrant', when one could say patriotic instead? No one is here just to work, unless it were a robot arriving in a crate; imigrants use public services and vote themselves socialist aggression on the net taxpayer, whose existence is ever so conveniently left out of account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toni</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53266</link>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53266</guid>
		<description>Steve - last comment for me on this.  But I&#039;m not totally against a guest worker program.  I do have significant doubts in the Federal govt antying up to the task of managing the process without encouraging another wave of illegal immigration.  I do believe though that under the table workers depress wages.  I don&#039;t buy the arguments that illegals pay their way currently.  If this was happening then hospitals wouldn&#039;t be going bankrupt. Citizens are just paying the difference in their wages through social services and entitlement programs which in essence then is a corporate welfare of sorts. I also think there should be significant fines for business which circumvent the law. But, currently I don&#039;t think the govt does a good job regarding employer ability to verify legal status of potential employees. There are a few things I think should happen with a guest worker program and that is separate designation for drivers licenses plus all guest workers must take a drivers test in English to receive the license, no free medical, Social security shouldn&#039;t be deducted but then guest workers don&#039;t qualify for Social security either, Fed and state income taxes have to be paid, also a medical screening requirement for transmittable diseases and I&#039;m sure there are other things if I thought about this a bit.  The system of illegal immigration is just plain unfair to those who jump through the hoops to be legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve - last comment for me on this.  But I'm not totally against a guest worker program.  I do have significant doubts in the Federal govt antying up to the task of managing the process without encouraging another wave of illegal immigration.  I do believe though that under the table workers depress wages.  I don't buy the arguments that illegals pay their way currently.  If this was happening then hospitals wouldn't be going bankrupt. Citizens are just paying the difference in their wages through social services and entitlement programs which in essence then is a corporate welfare of sorts. I also think there should be significant fines for business which circumvent the law. But, currently I don't think the govt does a good job regarding employer ability to verify legal status of potential employees. There are a few things I think should happen with a guest worker program and that is separate designation for drivers licenses plus all guest workers must take a drivers test in English to receive the license, no free medical, Social security shouldn't be deducted but then guest workers don't qualify for Social security either, Fed and state income taxes have to be paid, also a medical screening requirement for transmittable diseases and I'm sure there are other things if I thought about this a bit.  The system of illegal immigration is just plain unfair to those who jump through the hoops to be legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53161</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53161</guid>
		<description>I get the feeling you are hiding behind the law here toni.  Suppose a guest worker program was put in place and illegal immigration plummeted to very, very low numbers and guest workers jumped up so it is comparable to current illegal immigrant levels.  Now the question is would you be okay with this?  If you answer hinges on some economic notions (e.g. protecting American wage earners) then it strikes me as protectionism and that really you want little or no immigration of any kind.

Many anti-illegal immigration proponents argue the economic arguments as well as the national security arguments.  I find the national security issues compelling, but the economic arguments very much in the same vein as protectionism, living wage arguments, and anti-competition arguments.  National security does not mean we have to set immigration very low or at zero, but it would require a major shift in our current policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the feeling you are hiding behind the law here toni.  Suppose a guest worker program was put in place and illegal immigration plummeted to very, very low numbers and guest workers jumped up so it is comparable to current illegal immigrant levels.  Now the question is would you be okay with this?  If you answer hinges on some economic notions (e.g. protecting American wage earners) then it strikes me as protectionism and that really you want little or no immigration of any kind.</p>
<p>Many anti-illegal immigration proponents argue the economic arguments as well as the national security arguments.  I find the national security issues compelling, but the economic arguments very much in the same vein as protectionism, living wage arguments, and anti-competition arguments.  National security does not mean we have to set immigration very low or at zero, but it would require a major shift in our current policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toni</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53150</link>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53150</guid>
		<description>Well Steve - until the law changes protectionism has nothing to do with it.  Illegal today means not in the country by legal immigration methods.  I&#039;m still befuddled by your logic and how that transforms into protectionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Steve - until the law changes protectionism has nothing to do with it.  Illegal today means not in the country by legal immigration methods.  I'm still befuddled by your logic and how that transforms into protectionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53146</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53146</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am somewhat disturbed you have equated illegal to legal immigration. The first being a law breaker and the second following the law. So, I am to be considered anti-immigrant if I oppose illegal immigration by your logic. Hmmm.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you would oppose letting in the same number of immigrants via a legal immigration/guest worker program yes.  In that case I contend your opposition to illegal immigration is just a handy bit of misdirection and that your preferred stance is protectionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am somewhat disturbed you have equated illegal to legal immigration. The first being a law breaker and the second following the law. So, I am to be considered anti-immigrant if I oppose illegal immigration by your logic. Hmmm.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you would oppose letting in the same number of immigrants via a legal immigration/guest worker program yes.  In that case I contend your opposition to illegal immigration is just a handy bit of misdirection and that your preferred stance is protectionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toni</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53118</link>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53118</guid>
		<description>I am somewhat disturbed you have equated illegal to legal immigration.  The first being a law breaker and the second following the law.  So, I am to be considered anti-immigrant if I oppose illegal immigration by your logic.  Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am somewhat disturbed you have equated illegal to legal immigration.  The first being a law breaker and the second following the law.  So, I am to be considered anti-immigrant if I oppose illegal immigration by your logic.  Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiloh Sharps</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53116</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiloh Sharps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53116</guid>
		<description>Legal immigration through channels. Immigrants must want to BE American, not just seek riches. Illegal aliens - don&#039;t get me started. 

I know I know - the guy who hides in the engine compartment of a diesel electric locomotive for four days to get back to the $5 an hour stable mucking job in a Boston suburb he was deported from is exactly the kind of employee you want. Such dedication! Which is rationalizing on steroids. America is an ideal, not a cash register. America is a Dream, not a teat to suckle. America is a culture, not an all you can eat buffet. America is a shining hope, not a Salvation Army second hand store. America is a nation of Laws, NOT a nation of expediency. A nation built upon blood and sacrifice, dedicated to God&#039;s Will and Revealed Ways, NOT a merchant&#039;s wet dream of whatever puts the most money in the bank. America is Character writ large, not a nation created for hit and run opportunism. 

If people want to sup of the richness that is the wine of Americanism, let them pay the price Legally Established. Or else, what laws are we to respect? Are we to choose which laws we&#039;ll respect? To wink and nod and slide &#039;guest workers&#039; behind the umpire so no one will notice is to diminish my respect for law and order. Diminishing respect for Law is a certain path to doom, or else ya&#039;ll missed the Great Lesson that was both Israel and Rome. Look what one oral sex incident from a President did to diminish the respect of proper sexual conduct among our children. I can tell you first hand that having gotten away with hundreds of illegal aliens in their ranks, contractors, shippers, warehousers, all sorts of men I know have become more calloused about America. More calloused about whether or not this nation stands for something bigger than just the almighty dollar. Are more calloused about friends and family and certainly more calloused about the legitimacy of government. They&#039;re making great money but their spirits are being corrupted.

I ask you - which is easier to repair? 

The glaring neon lesson of illegal aliens is that (a) anything that pays is more desirable than obeying the Law. (b) you can get away with most anything if you prosper the Right People. (c) we&#039;re not a nation of blind justice and equal stature before the Law and (d) Character means dick in America when money is on the table. 

I truly despair, a deep angry knot in the guts that playing by the rules means absolutely nothing anymore to Pundits, Politicians, and apparently more than half of my fellow citizens. This is no longer the Nation I was raised to inherit, cherish and protect. 

Money has truly surmounted Character as the god who will be worshipped. It&#039;s cloying decay is killing us, individually and nationally. Like Shaddrach, Meshach and Abednego, with this kind of shadow upon the land it will soon be the worship of gold, or the furnace for us as a nation. 

Most people have already signaled their preference. 

Show Me the Money wins in a landslide over Doing The Right Thing.  

Not chasing the Money is just laughable to the people I know. Bend any rule, push aside any Law, trash whatever is in the way to line their pockets. Why not??  Everyone else is doing it and no one&#039;s being held to account. 

And our nation will die because of it.  

Shiloh Sharps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal immigration through channels. Immigrants must want to BE American, not just seek riches. Illegal aliens - don't get me started. </p>
<p>I know I know - the guy who hides in the engine compartment of a diesel electric locomotive for four days to get back to the $5 an hour stable mucking job in a Boston suburb he was deported from is exactly the kind of employee you want. Such dedication! Which is rationalizing on steroids. America is an ideal, not a cash register. America is a Dream, not a teat to suckle. America is a culture, not an all you can eat buffet. America is a shining hope, not a Salvation Army second hand store. America is a nation of Laws, NOT a nation of expediency. A nation built upon blood and sacrifice, dedicated to God's Will and Revealed Ways, NOT a merchant's wet dream of whatever puts the most money in the bank. America is Character writ large, not a nation created for hit and run opportunism. </p>
<p>If people want to sup of the richness that is the wine of Americanism, let them pay the price Legally Established. Or else, what laws are we to respect? Are we to choose which laws we'll respect? To wink and nod and slide 'guest workers' behind the umpire so no one will notice is to diminish my respect for law and order. Diminishing respect for Law is a certain path to doom, or else ya'll missed the Great Lesson that was both Israel and Rome. Look what one oral sex incident from a President did to diminish the respect of proper sexual conduct among our children. I can tell you first hand that having gotten away with hundreds of illegal aliens in their ranks, contractors, shippers, warehousers, all sorts of men I know have become more calloused about America. More calloused about whether or not this nation stands for something bigger than just the almighty dollar. Are more calloused about friends and family and certainly more calloused about the legitimacy of government. They're making great money but their spirits are being corrupted.</p>
<p>I ask you - which is easier to repair? </p>
<p>The glaring neon lesson of illegal aliens is that (a) anything that pays is more desirable than obeying the Law. (b) you can get away with most anything if you prosper the Right People. (c) we're not a nation of blind justice and equal stature before the Law and (d) Character means dick in America when money is on the table. </p>
<p>I truly despair, a deep angry knot in the guts that playing by the rules means absolutely nothing anymore to Pundits, Politicians, and apparently more than half of my fellow citizens. This is no longer the Nation I was raised to inherit, cherish and protect. </p>
<p>Money has truly surmounted Character as the god who will be worshipped. It's cloying decay is killing us, individually and nationally. Like Shaddrach, Meshach and Abednego, with this kind of shadow upon the land it will soon be the worship of gold, or the furnace for us as a nation. </p>
<p>Most people have already signaled their preference. </p>
<p>Show Me the Money wins in a landslide over Doing The Right Thing.  </p>
<p>Not chasing the Money is just laughable to the people I know. Bend any rule, push aside any Law, trash whatever is in the way to line their pockets. Why not??  Everyone else is doing it and no one's being held to account. </p>
<p>And our nation will die because of it.  </p>
<p>Shiloh Sharps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53104</guid>
		<description>Well lets face it, we NEED the immigrants to do our low paying jobs. Do you think you or I will be staing in the middle of the field picking cherries, in 90 degrees weather and getting paid $8.50/hr ? The answer is NO, so we should be happy that someone else is doing those jobs or we would be importing all the foods from China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well lets face it, we NEED the immigrants to do our low paying jobs. Do you think you or I will be staing in the middle of the field picking cherries, in 90 degrees weather and getting paid $8.50/hr ? The answer is NO, so we should be happy that someone else is doing those jobs or we would be importing all the foods from China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53098</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53098</guid>
		<description>Bryan,

Hmmm...I don&#039;t know.  I think all of them have sorts of laws and regulations controlling what comes in.  These don&#039;t have to be fore economic reasons, but they can still have an economic effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,</p>
<p>Hmmm...I don't know.  I think all of them have sorts of laws and regulations controlling what comes in.  These don't have to be fore economic reasons, but they can still have an economic effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53096</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53096</guid>
		<description>Steve, 

Here&#039;s a softball question for you. Is there any country in the world that *doesn&#039;t* practice protectionism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, </p>
<p>Here's a softball question for you. Is there any country in the world that *doesn't* practice protectionism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Voice in the Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53085</link>
		<dc:creator>A Voice in the Dark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53085</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why Immigration Worries Conservatives &lt;/strong&gt;

This is not precisely the case. The idea here is that most people are middle class, and that most immigrants (legal or illegal) are comparable in ability...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Immigration Worries Conservatives </strong></p>
<p>This is not precisely the case. The idea here is that most people are middle class, and that most immigrants (legal or illegal) are comparable in ability...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53079</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53079</guid>
		<description>Inattention to illegal immigration could threaten continued political support for legal immigration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inattention to illegal immigration could threaten continued political support for legal immigration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryA</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53078</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53078</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a software engineer for an automotive supplier and I already have to compete with out-sourced labor (30-50 percent of the programming work is outsourced) AND immigration labor (H1B immigrants working on-site).

My wages have been frozen for the last five years while the benefits (health care, etc) have been reduced.

They are even starting to manage some of the projects off-shore.

I&#039;m 57 so the thought of starting over in another field is troubling (to say the least). 

I&#039;m either between a rock and a hard place or the light I see at the end of the tunnel is really a rapidly approaching train...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a software engineer for an automotive supplier and I already have to compete with out-sourced labor (30-50 percent of the programming work is outsourced) AND immigration labor (H1B immigrants working on-site).</p>
<p>My wages have been frozen for the last five years while the benefits (health care, etc) have been reduced.</p>
<p>They are even starting to manage some of the projects off-shore.</p>
<p>I'm 57 so the thought of starting over in another field is troubling (to say the least). </p>
<p>I'm either between a rock and a hard place or the light I see at the end of the tunnel is really a rapidly approaching train...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53073</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53073</guid>
		<description>DaveD,

David C has it.  If legal immigration were of the same magnitude as illegal immigration we&#039;d observe pretty much the same economic outcomes in terms of wages.  Hence, the economic arguments apply to both legal and illegal immigration.

David C,

Good point.  For one thing, the protectionist policies tend to almost never increase employment in the protect industries, but instead simply result in a price increase.  This of course is bad for all those consumers who consume goods from the protected industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveD,</p>
<p>David C has it.  If legal immigration were of the same magnitude as illegal immigration we'd observe pretty much the same economic outcomes in terms of wages.  Hence, the economic arguments apply to both legal and illegal immigration.</p>
<p>David C,</p>
<p>Good point.  For one thing, the protectionist policies tend to almost never increase employment in the protect industries, but instead simply result in a price increase.  This of course is bad for all those consumers who consume goods from the protected industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/is_anti-immigration_the_new_mercantilism/comment-page-1/#comment-53065</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11472#comment-53065</guid>
		<description>The underlying *economic* point is the same for either legal or illegal immigration.

And BTW, one of the problems with mercantilism or any other form of protectionist theory is that even *if* the politicians/policy makers in other countries are complete dolts, the tariffs *still* hurt you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The underlying *economic* point is the same for either legal or illegal immigration.</p>
<p>And BTW, one of the problems with mercantilism or any other form of protectionist theory is that even *if* the politicians/policy makers in other countries are complete dolts, the tariffs *still* hurt you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
