Jihadis, Elections and Ramadi
 |
James Joyner | Wednesday, December 14, 2005 |
Bill Roggio has an interesting report from Ramadi:
As Election Day quickly approaches in Iraq, the various jihadi factions and the non-jihadist insurgents are taking their varied positions on how to deal with the voting process. The domestic insurgents, foreign fighters and jihadist do not have a unified position on how to deal with the electoral process, and their official statements reflects this.
al-Qaeda and allied Salafist jihadi groups, according to the SITE Institute, âvow to continue jihad, separate themselves from any group or person who enters into negotiations with the Iraqi government and its supporters, and states that involvement in the âpolitical operationâ is prohibited by Islamic law.â
Ansar Al Sunnah says the Islamic world has a choice between jihad and democracy, and those who participate in democracy are a âpartner in the guiltâ and are âlosers.â They do not threaten to conduct attacks during the election, nor are they asking for their members to silence their guns.
Islamic Army in Iraq has ordered its adherents to refrain from attacking polling places. And Baathist insurgents are encouraging Sunnis to vote and vow to defend the polling centers from attacks by Zarqawi’s terrorists. This is a far cry from the bold threats made just under a year ago.
In Ramadi, Mizhar al-Dulaimi, a prominent Sunni and the leader of the Free Progressive Iraqi Party, has been murdered while campaigning in the heart of the city. Three of his bodyguards were wounded.
[...]
The parliementary elections are a positive development for the future of democracy in Iraq and for further splits between the native insurgents and the jihadists, but are not a panacea to the problems in Ramadi. At some point the leaders and residents of the city must chose to reject the insurgency or suffer the fate of Fallujah and Tal Afar.
Certainly true. A strong turnout at the polls in the face of terrorist threats and pressure from religious leaders would seem to be a strong step in that direction, though.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Journalism as Friend Building
- UPS vs. FedEx Whiteboard Video
- Obama Hurt Deeds in Virginia
- Reading the Bill is a Waste of Time
- Abbas: Palestinian Authority May Disband
- Jodi Rell Not Running
- Caption Contest Winners
- OTB Latenight – Styx
- Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later
- Oklahoma High Schoolers Are Very Familiar With George Washington, Thanks
One wonders whether the murder of al-Dulaimi (from the name, it seems he was a member of a very powerful clan) may have some profound effects on the viability of certain portions of the "insurgency". On the other hand, it may be that the matter is more about inter-clan conflict than sectarian or government vs. anti-government violence.
Comments are Closed
