<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Cramer&#8217;s Crystal Balls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:16:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-991050</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-991050</guid>
		<description>The unedited Stewart &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-and-jim-cramer-the-extended-daily-show-interview/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt; with Cramer was devastating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unedited Stewart <a href="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-and-jim-cramer-the-extended-daily-show-interview/" rel="nofollow">interview</a> with Cramer was devastating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990220</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990220</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;why are we measuring them two months into the year?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No time to lose, Steve.  IIRC James, Dave Schuler and others at OTB have made their predictions for 2009.  Time to evaluate whether they were right or insane.  In times of bread and circuses, I know it makes me feel better to send in the clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>why are we measuring them two months into the year?</p></blockquote>
<p>No time to lose, Steve.  IIRC James, Dave Schuler and others at OTB have made their predictions for 2009.  Time to evaluate whether they were right or insane.  In times of bread and circuses, I know it makes me feel better to send in the clowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990133</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990133</guid>
		<description>Steve, the thing all the brain research tells us is that &lt;i&gt;we are prediction junkies, even when we know &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; the predictions are bad.&lt;/i&gt;

I mean, think about all the people to come on TV to give the year&#039;s closing DOW.  They are wrong, except for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-Chance-Markets/dp/0812975219&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some random SOB&lt;/a&gt;, but we keep tuning in, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, the thing all the brain research tells us is that <i>we are prediction junkies, even when we know <b>all</b> the predictions are bad.</i></p>
<p>I mean, think about all the people to come on TV to give the year's closing DOW.  They are wrong, except for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-Chance-Markets/dp/0812975219" rel="nofollow">some random SOB</a>, but we keep tuning in, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990128</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990128</guid>
		<description>Now I&#039;m far from being Cramer fan but doesn&#039;t this seem unfair?  How did the other guys do on their predictions?  When did Cramer make these predictions?  If these are 2009 predictions why are we measuring them two months into the year?

Looks to me like when Cramer crossed the Obama administration he made some enemies.  Lovely.  I like to think my president&#039;s supporters are capable of character assassination since it bodes well for all critics and we know such dissent is the highest form of patriotism.

Who cares what the Daily Show is doing, it&#039;s comedy, not news.  It&#039;s for kids and slackers who can&#039;t handle adult commentary on real issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I'm far from being Cramer fan but doesn't this seem unfair?  How did the other guys do on their predictions?  When did Cramer make these predictions?  If these are 2009 predictions why are we measuring them two months into the year?</p>
<p>Looks to me like when Cramer crossed the Obama administration he made some enemies.  Lovely.  I like to think my president's supporters are capable of character assassination since it bodes well for all critics and we know such dissent is the highest form of patriotism.</p>
<p>Who cares what the Daily Show is doing, it's comedy, not news.  It's for kids and slackers who can't handle adult commentary on real issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990122</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990122</guid>
		<description>The continuing Cramer sage on the Daily Show has been hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continuing Cramer sage on the Daily Show has been hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990111</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990111</guid>
		<description>There is a very good book called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Your-Money-Brain-Science-Neuroeconomics/dp/074327668X&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Your Money and Your Brain&lt;/a&gt;.  Whoever did the subtitle got it wrong.  It should be &quot;How a little self-brain-knowledge can keep you from getting poor, fast.&quot;

Cramer, and most daytime financial channels, cater to the wrong impulses, the risks that are more likely to make us poor than rich.

The steady, sane, less emotional stuff of good financial planning doesn&#039;t make as exciting TV.

If I&#039;m remembering correctly, Carmen Ulrich on CNBC is a little steadier and saner ... but less exciting, right?

Anyway, I&#039;ve done a fair amount of reading on the boundaries of brains and money (Blank Slate, Winner&#039;s Curse, Descartes&#039; Error, Fooled by Randomness, Cheating Monkeys Citizen Bees, etc.) and I&#039;ll say take Zweig&#039;s book over Cramer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very good book called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Your-Money-Brain-Science-Neuroeconomics/dp/074327668X" rel="nofollow">Your Money and Your Brain</a>.  Whoever did the subtitle got it wrong.  It should be "How a little self-brain-knowledge can keep you from getting poor, fast."</p>
<p>Cramer, and most daytime financial channels, cater to the wrong impulses, the risks that are more likely to make us poor than rich.</p>
<p>The steady, sane, less emotional stuff of good financial planning doesn't make as exciting TV.</p>
<p>If I'm remembering correctly, Carmen Ulrich on CNBC is a little steadier and saner ... but less exciting, right?</p>
<p>Anyway, I've done a fair amount of reading on the boundaries of brains and money (Blank Slate, Winner's Curse, Descartes' Error, Fooled by Randomness, Cheating Monkeys Citizen Bees, etc.) and I'll say take Zweig's book over Cramer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990104</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990104</guid>
		<description>This looks a bit bogus, though the original data is not linked when I click through.  If I understand it correctly, this is what the first entry in the bar graph means:

American Airlines traded at $11.26 per share at the close of 2008.  Cramer is predicting the shares will hit $15.00 by the end of the 2009.  As of 3/6/09, American Airlines is trading at $5.22 per share.

His prediction is well off if 3/6/09 is any gauge.  As of 12/31/09, who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks a bit bogus, though the original data is not linked when I click through.  If I understand it correctly, this is what the first entry in the bar graph means:</p>
<p>American Airlines traded at $11.26 per share at the close of 2008.  Cramer is predicting the shares will hit $15.00 by the end of the 2009.  As of 3/6/09, American Airlines is trading at $5.22 per share.</p>
<p>His prediction is well off if 3/6/09 is any gauge.  As of 12/31/09, who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_cramers_crystal_balls/comment-page-1/#comment-990089</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33062#comment-990089</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
On the other hand, Cramer isn’t merely a prognosticator, he’s the host of an insanely popular (by the standards of CNBC, anyway) host of an investment show.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Reminds me a little of Tim Taylor&#039;s description of &lt;i&gt;Tool Time&lt;/i&gt;:  the 3rd highest rated tool show in eastern Michigan on basic cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
On the other hand, Cramer isn&rsquo;t merely a prognosticator, he&rsquo;s the host of an insanely popular (by the standards of CNBC, anyway) host of an investment show.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Reminds me a little of Tim Taylor's description of <i>Tool Time</i>:  the 3rd highest rated tool show in eastern Michigan on basic cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
