Comments on: John Edwards ‘Love Child’ Photo

By: Sydney

Sydney — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:45:00 +0000

How stupid does he think we are? Obviously he never told his wife about the affair in 2006. Because if he had admitted the affair in 2006, Elizabeth NEVER would have allowed Rielle to go on the campaign trail with John during the latter PART of 2006 and you wouldn't be seeing photos of her filming him in December of 2006. Thank you. I rest my case.

By: The National Enquirer Photos Of John Edwards And Love Child In Clearer Detail Here | THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™

Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:12:04 +0000

[...] James Joyner of Outside The Beltway: “… could be John Edwards with some random baby and all PhotoShopped. Who knows these days? …” [...]

By: rodney dill

rodney dill — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:44:59 +0000

Looks like Pat Sajak as much as it does like Edwards.

By: John Edwards Scandal: Enquirer Photos Give MSM a BIG Smoking Gun | DBKP - The Worldwide Leader in Weird

Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:37:47 +0000

[...] Joyner, at Outside The Beltway, is not convinced, [John Edwards ‘Love Child’ Photo] observing, “Or, it could be John Edwards with some random baby and all PhotoShopped. Who [...]

By: The Other Ed

The Other Ed — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:19:55 +0000

"distinctive striped curtains" are damning proof?

Not to me. I'm waiting for Bat Boy to come forward as a witness!

By: markm

markm — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:13:57 +0000

I don't know...it kinda sorda looks like him..maybe. I would think you'd have a wee bit better pic before you run to the presses thought wouldn't ya??. I mean, in the "Gone Hollywood" section on the side of this blog there are from time to time some she celeb with her nibbly bits exposed and cleaner pics are taken from quite a distance. Just sayin'.

By: Linda Peacock

Linda Peacock — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:44:41 +0000

This does not look like John Edwards at all! Thank you for releasing this photo.

By: A Blog For All

A Blog For All — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:36:14 +0000

Edwards Love Child Photos?...

Will the Los Angeles Times now deem the story newsworthy? Or, will they, like other big media outlets, continue to embargo the story because they've decided that it isn't worth our time to read about Edwards conduct and marital infidelities?...