Comments on: Journalist Makes News, Apologizes

By: graywolf

graywolf — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:59:37 +0000

More like "its inevitable that these sorts of things happen" because the media and Democrats are one and the same.

The media essentially being pom pom girls for the hate-America left (ie Democrats).

By: Christopher

Christopher — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:23:10 +0000

That has to be the most hilarious thing I have ever read!

Liberal reporters (read: 90% of all reporters. Forgive me if I don't use their preferred term of "journalists" because most aren't) have been coining derogatory terms and making politically slanted reports against conservatives for
Y E A R S.

Then someone finally reports the truth of a traitorous liberal and what do they do? They apologize for it. HA!

By: Wayne

Wayne — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:39:03 +0000

The truth of the matter is Murtha’s plan is a slow bleed plan. I suspect Harris wouldn’t care if it hurt a Republican.

By: Tano

Tano — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:58:18 +0000

Its kinda strange to charge someone with using slight(sic) of hand when he states explicitly what he is trying to do, as Murtha did.

And it should be pointed out that Harris did make the point that when he used the term "slow bleed" he was referring to the ebbing political support for the Bush administrations plans, not to any strategy of bleeding away financial support for the troops. He characterizes the Republicans (mis)use of his term as demagogic.

Just for the record..

By: yetanotherjohn

yetanotherjohn — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:25:18 +0000

On the other hand, I think the phrase did quite a bit to "clarify political debate". Murtha wants the US out of Iraq. He tried to do it by slight of hand since direct action is beyond him. Pointing out the slight of hand, even with colorful language brings clarity to Murtha's actions.