<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judd Gregg to Commerce after Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:28:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve s</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-867681</link>
		<dc:creator>steve s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31000#comment-867681</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The promise to appoint a caretaker Republican alleviates the short-term objection from Republicans to Judd taking the seat — that an appointed Democrat would likely give the party the elusive “filibuster proof” 60 votes. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I sincerely hope the dems can get 60 or more in 2010. Then the Party of Stupid will have little power and they can sit around playing with their Palin and Joe the Plumber action figures while the adults try to fix the messes they made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The promise to appoint a caretaker Republican alleviates the short-term objection from Republicans to Judd taking the seat — that an appointed Democrat would likely give the party the elusive “filibuster proof” 60 votes. </p></blockquote>
<p>I sincerely hope the dems can get 60 or more in 2010. Then the Party of Stupid will have little power and they can sit around playing with their Palin and Joe the Plumber action figures while the adults try to fix the messes they made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-864786</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31000#comment-864786</guid>
		<description>What am I missing?  Why is it taken as given that the Republican the Lynch will appoint will oppose Obama&#039;s economic recovery agenda?  It will after be a NH Republican chosen by a Democratic governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What am I missing?  Why is it taken as given that the Republican the Lynch will appoint will oppose Obama's economic recovery agenda?  It will after be a NH Republican chosen by a Democratic governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-863955</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31000#comment-863955</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sure. But he&#039;s one less vote for Obama, too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Unless Gregg puts forward better policy, because he is good for the job.  Again the non-cynical view is that Obama wants support for better policy, not better support for bad policy.

Not that I&#039;m taking the non-cynical view. I think this is more an illusion of bi-partisanship than anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sure. But he's one less vote for Obama, too.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unless Gregg puts forward better policy, because he is good for the job.  Again the non-cynical view is that Obama wants support for better policy, not better support for bad policy.</p>
<p>Not that I'm taking the non-cynical view. I think this is more an illusion of bi-partisanship than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-863942</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31000#comment-863942</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, there&#039;s always the non-cynical view that maybe he&#039;d be good for the job. That is, whatever a Commerce Secretary does. :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure. But he&#039;s one less vote for Obama, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, there's always the non-cynical view that maybe he'd be good for the job. That is, whatever a Commerce Secretary does. :)</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure. But he's one less vote for Obama, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonk Room &#187; Judd Gregg, A Conservative Champion Of The Oceans</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-863941</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonk Room &#187; Judd Gregg, A Conservative Champion Of The Oceans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31000#comment-863941</guid>
		<description>[...] Judd Gregg (R-NH), President Barack Obama&#8217;s pick to be Secretary of Commerce, is a hard-core conservative. He supports drilling in the Arctic Refuge, opposes the United [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Judd Gregg (R-NH), President Barack Obama&#8217;s pick to be Secretary of Commerce, is a hard-core conservative. He supports drilling in the Arctic Refuge, opposes the United [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judd_gregg_to_commerce_after_deal/comment-page-1/#comment-863940</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31000#comment-863940</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m afraid the move doesn’t make sense from any standpoint except Lynch’s in the short term.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, there&#039;s always the non-cynical view that maybe he&#039;d be good for the job.  That is, whatever a Commerce Secretary does.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m afraid the move doesn&rsquo;t make sense from any standpoint except Lynch&rsquo;s in the short term.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, there's always the non-cynical view that maybe he'd be good for the job.  That is, whatever a Commerce Secretary does.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
