<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging a Book By its Cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judging_a_book_by_its_cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judging_a_book_by_its_cover/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:12:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judging_a_book_by_its_cover/comment-page-1/#comment-16801</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6117#comment-16801</guid>
		<description>Marginalia. Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marginalia. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judging_a_book_by_its_cover/comment-page-1/#comment-16802</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6117#comment-16802</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;concurring in part and dissenting in part from the views of Polytroposâ Nate.&lt;/i&gt;

But was this opinion distinguished from Taylor v. Baude?

As long as we&#039;re going through the legalese, I figured you might as well go for the whole enchilada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>concurring in part and dissenting in part from the views of Polytroposâ Nate.</i></p>
<p>But was this opinion distinguished from Taylor v. Baude?</p>
<p>As long as we're going through the legalese, I figured you might as well go for the whole enchilada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judging_a_book_by_its_cover/comment-page-1/#comment-16803</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6117#comment-16803</guid>
		<description>Hey, that reminds me? Did you ever find time to read it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that reminds me? Did you ever find time to read it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crescat Sententia</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/judging_a_book_by_its_cover/comment-page-1/#comment-16804</link>
		<dc:creator>Crescat Sententia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6117#comment-16804</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buying Books&lt;/strong&gt;
Related to the hardbacks v. paperbacks kerfluffle (responses are here, here, here, here, and here): Amber Taylor has a lovely post on a strategy and philosophy of book-buying. Such philosophies must be individuated of course (taking into account one&#039;s ...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buying Books</strong><br />
Related to the hardbacks v. paperbacks kerfluffle (responses are here, here, here, here, and here): Amber Taylor has a lovely post on a strategy and philosophy of book-buying. Such philosophies must be individuated of course (taking into account one's ...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
