"This didn't have to happen", Cho Seung-Hui said, after brutally murdering thirty-two people at Virginia Tech University.

And this terrible tragedy of sons, daughters, mothers and fathers didn't have to happen, if we'd only listened.

But we never listen.

We never listen to those that are different from us- the outcasts, the lonely, the homeless, the ones that are unspoken for. We don't try to understand. We shun them and put them out of our minds because of our fear that we will become like them.

And these people become more and more lonely and alienated in their isolation.

Words like "creep", "deranged misfit" and "psycho" devalue this killer's humanity so we don't have to face how similar he is to us. Cries of "how could he have been stopped" are uttered by media quick to sensationalize and gain market share, when the words "how could he have been listened to" are never considered.

Because we don't want to listen.

We don't want to hear about loneliness and alienation when we're all so busy with our lives, making money and making friends. And the unpopular, the ones that don't fit in, the lonely ones are ignored or made fun of because we don't care to understand anything about them.

As a boy, Cho Seung-Hui "was picked on, pushed around and laughed at over his shyness" (Associated Press). When he started college, according to the Guardian, "his mother took his dormitory mates to one side to explain about her son's unusual character and implored them to help."

And he clearly needed help, devaluing himself so much that he called himself "Question Mark".

There are more "Question Marks" out there. There are millions of them. And if we don't listen to them, they will follow the same path again and again, because people are not connecting. We are becoming more and more disconnected from each other, creating more and more "Question Marks" every day.

Most "Question Marks" don't become murderers. Some just kill themselves. Most harm no one and live just as we do, needing antidepressants to appear what we call "normal". They may be someone you know, someone you love.

This "Question Mark" was once a little boy, who cried, and smiled and loved, He wanted to fit in just like you and I. But that desire to fit in transformed itself into anger towards a society that shunned and ignored him.

How many more times will we shun and ignore the one that doesn't fit in, the one in the corner, the one that's different? When all we have to do is listen, before it's too late.

But we won't.

Thirty-two human beings who did not know Cho Seung-Hui were murdered.
They were sons, daughters, fathers and mothers, with dreams of futures that will never come and children that will never be born. The thirty-two leave behind people that love them. People that are now scarred for life by this horrible day of death.

To most of us that have not been directly involved, this tragedy will become a memory and fade like all the others that came before.

And the "Question Marks" will appear with more frequency, again and again, because we don't listen.

We never do.

---------------

http://www.x-thc.com

When my parents were attending High School both of them were involved with Firearms.

My Mother was on the Rifle team at Tacoma High School.

My Mother never killed anyone.

My Father actually brought his shotgun to School so he could hunt Ducks down at the Lake after school.

My father never killed anyone.

So called "Gun Free Zones" give an Illusion of Safety that can very easily be shattered by
any Sick person that knows that potential Victims are all Disarmed there.

Just as Burglers always go for the easy Target, So it is with Mass Murderers.

They know they will be unopposed.

Almost as if we should have learned something the last time.

They did - passing more gun control laws increases gun violence

Of course, the problem with *that* line of thinking is that the 'extra fatalities' are purely your assumption.

Why not suggest they be armed with Mace or a taser?

Because the effective range for mace or TASER is only 15-18 feet. Against a gun, those tools are only slightly more effective than harsh language.

And let's save time by your not dancing around this one... answer the question directly.

(Clue: I've already researched this)

They STILL wouldn't have killed anyone if they hadn't owned guns, now would they?

Who knows? The largest mass slaughter of school children in America was comitted by a bomber (Andrew Kehoe) in 1927. You're never going to stop random nutcases from going on rampages. Blaming the VT massacre on the prevalence of guns is boilerplate liberal dogma, but it doesn't mean a thing. Per capita, American automobile owners kill more people with their cars than gun owners do with their firearms. Eliminating guns is not going to eliminate mass murder.

How many would have been killed if the students had guns and were trained in their use for self defense?

Here are the problems with that line of thinking:

A) it totally ignores all the extra fatalities that would occur if you had so many more people armed.

B) there is no reason anyone would have needed a gun to stop this guy. Why not suggest they be armed with Mace or a taser? You know something that is unlikely to kill if used accidentally or by someone who snaps? Or at the very least less likely to kill 30+?

Oh yeah.

Um, what about the roughly 80,000,000 American gun owners who did NOT kill anybody today?

They STILL wouldn't have killed anyone if they hadn't owned guns, now would they?

If I've a gun and he has a gun then, hey, we don't need no stinkin' laws.