<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keith Ellison Wants to Take Oath on Koran, Not Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:12:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tad</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-106600</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-106600</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And it’s Bible, not bible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually it should be &lt;i&gt;Bible&lt;/i&gt; or Bible according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://depts.gallaudet.edu/englishworks/writing/proofread.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;English Works&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately theres no differentiating between fiction and non-fiction. Since the Bible is fiction it&#039;d be nice to be able to show it by placing it in quotes like &quot;Bible&quot; or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And it&rsquo;s Bible, not bible.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually it should be <i>Bible</i> or Bible according to <a href="http://depts.gallaudet.edu/englishworks/writing/proofread.html" rel="nofollow">English Works</a>. Unfortunately theres no differentiating between fiction and non-fiction. Since the Bible is fiction it'd be nice to be able to show it by placing it in quotes like "Bible" or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-106046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-106046</guid>
		<description>If no book is required to be sworn upon, why the fuss?  And it&#039;s Bible, not bible.  And the teaching of the Bible in school, and Christian beliefs of our founders, does hold value.  Their awareness of not wanting to have government dictate religion, or the reverse, was to maintain functionality for both.  I would have to guess that since there is a fuss, people are sworn in on the Bible.  And either everyone does or, or no one does it.  Being in a country of a supposed majority of Christians, while abortion, etc. reign supreme, tells me folks don&#039;t take their religious convictions seriously, so putting your hand on a Bible won&#039;t change much.  But individuals don&#039;t dictate these matters, any more than it is appropriate for a mayor in San Francisco to unilaterally marry gay people.  Whatever the procedure, whatever the law, respect it and follow it, until such time as it is changed.  As to Christianity, and fake and petty religions, and the many other comments and digs, I reckon each of us will find out for sure in time.  Until that time, when we will know for sure, we have the right to choose as we wish in this regard.  It&#039;s a matter of the heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If no book is required to be sworn upon, why the fuss?  And it's Bible, not bible.  And the teaching of the Bible in school, and Christian beliefs of our founders, does hold value.  Their awareness of not wanting to have government dictate religion, or the reverse, was to maintain functionality for both.  I would have to guess that since there is a fuss, people are sworn in on the Bible.  And either everyone does or, or no one does it.  Being in a country of a supposed majority of Christians, while abortion, etc. reign supreme, tells me folks don't take their religious convictions seriously, so putting your hand on a Bible won't change much.  But individuals don't dictate these matters, any more than it is appropriate for a mayor in San Francisco to unilaterally marry gay people.  Whatever the procedure, whatever the law, respect it and follow it, until such time as it is changed.  As to Christianity, and fake and petty religions, and the many other comments and digs, I reckon each of us will find out for sure in time.  Until that time, when we will know for sure, we have the right to choose as we wish in this regard.  It's a matter of the heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105897</link>
		<dc:creator>SR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105897</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We are a Christian nation which shows respect to other religions by letting them worship freely.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Really? Brrrr.

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theology.edu/journal/volume2/ushistor.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;  page.

The link leads to a very thorough, well-researched, and well-footnoted page supporting my argument below. Some of those points have already been made above.

&quot;We are a Christian nation...&quot;

The United States government was set up, intentionally, as a CIVIL structure - with no specific religious overtones whatsoever. They had ample opportunity to make this a Christian country, but deliberately chose otherwise.

Pat, serious question: On what basis do you believe this to be a specifically Christian country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are a Christian nation which shows respect to other religions by letting them worship freely.</p></blockquote>
<p> Really? Brrrr.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.theology.edu/journal/volume2/ushistor.htm" rel="nofollow">this</a>  page.</p>
<p>The link leads to a very thorough, well-researched, and well-footnoted page supporting my argument below. Some of those points have already been made above.</p>
<p>"We are a Christian nation..."</p>
<p>The United States government was set up, intentionally, as a CIVIL structure - with no specific religious overtones whatsoever. They had ample opportunity to make this a Christian country, but deliberately chose otherwise.</p>
<p>Pat, serious question: On what basis do you believe this to be a specifically Christian country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105894</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105894</guid>
		<description>As a muslim i dont see anything wrong with taking an oath on any of these books i.e. Quran, Bible, Torah.. As they are all words of God. 

If Ellison is to swear on a book other than the Bible, only tradition will change. But if hes forced to use the Bible then the constitution will change. 

Peace from the middle east...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a muslim i dont see anything wrong with taking an oath on any of these books i.e. Quran, Bible, Torah.. As they are all words of God. </p>
<p>If Ellison is to swear on a book other than the Bible, only tradition will change. But if hes forced to use the Bible then the constitution will change. </p>
<p>Peace from the middle east...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Keibler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105844</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Keibler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105844</guid>
		<description>Pat:
REQUIRING to swear an oath upon the bible should be considered unconstitutional. 

&quot;Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;...&quot; 

Now I&#039;m not a constitutional lawyer but that sounds like it applies here. This Amendment might be subject to interpretation, like most human language, just like your bible. But at least the Constitution hasn&#039;t been hashed up and misinterpreted through translation from other languages and mucked up by kings etc. Yet...

And you&#039;re forgetting about YOUR lost 11th Commandment; &quot;Thou shalt not impose your religion upon others, unsolicited.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat:<br />
REQUIRING to swear an oath upon the bible should be considered unconstitutional. </p>
<p>"Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..." </p>
<p>Now I'm not a constitutional lawyer but that sounds like it applies here. This Amendment might be subject to interpretation, like most human language, just like your bible. But at least the Constitution hasn't been hashed up and misinterpreted through translation from other languages and mucked up by kings etc. Yet...</p>
<p>And you're forgetting about YOUR lost 11th Commandment; "Thou shalt not impose your religion upon others, unsolicited."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Florida Masochist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fear of Muslims and Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105697</link>
		<dc:creator>The Florida Masochist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fear of Muslims and Islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105697</guid>
		<description>[...] TFM has no issue with Ellison using a Quran. As James Joyner at OTB points out, the US constitution makes no requirement as to even a bible. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TFM has no issue with Ellison using a Quran. As James Joyner at OTB points out, the US constitution makes no requirement as to even a bible. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105659</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105659</guid>
		<description>Dear Scott,

I didn&#039;t say &quot;petty&quot; or &quot;fake.&quot;  I meant Christian values are the bedrock of OUR culture and OUR country, and therefore they should be respected.  If I was elected to public office in Iran, and they said I must swear on the Koran, I would.  Because it is that land&#039;s most sacred text, and even though I personally don&#039;t agree with it, I would show respect for the country and people I am about to serve.  This is not a matter of religion, legal or illegal, it is a matter of common courtesy and respect for a nation&#039;s heritage.  Not everything is about YOU THE INDIVIDUAL, the favorite fetish of the left.  Sometimes you put your pride aside, give the lawyers a rest, and remove your hat for the people and what is important to them.  In this land, it is the Bible.  In Iran, it is the Koran.  I didn&#039;t choose it this way, that&#039;s just how it happened.  But out of respect for both, I&#039;ll never confuse the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Scott,</p>
<p>I didn't say "petty" or "fake."  I meant Christian values are the bedrock of OUR culture and OUR country, and therefore they should be respected.  If I was elected to public office in Iran, and they said I must swear on the Koran, I would.  Because it is that land's most sacred text, and even though I personally don't agree with it, I would show respect for the country and people I am about to serve.  This is not a matter of religion, legal or illegal, it is a matter of common courtesy and respect for a nation's heritage.  Not everything is about YOU THE INDIVIDUAL, the favorite fetish of the left.  Sometimes you put your pride aside, give the lawyers a rest, and remove your hat for the people and what is important to them.  In this land, it is the Bible.  In Iran, it is the Koran.  I didn't choose it this way, that's just how it happened.  But out of respect for both, I'll never confuse the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Keibler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105621</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Keibler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105621</guid>
		<description>Pat says:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Koran, or a Golden Cow, or a lucky rabbit’s foot, may be sacred to you, but not most people in this country, so your oath is not going to mean much to anybody but you. We are a Christian nation which shows respect to other religions by letting them worship freely.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let the mighty majority allow the &quot;others&quot; to practice their petty &quot;fake&quot; religions. &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&amp;q=xenophobia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Xenophobia&lt;/a&gt;  is alive and well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat says:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Koran, or a Golden Cow, or a lucky rabbit&rsquo;s foot, may be sacred to you, but not most people in this country, so your oath is not going to mean much to anybody but you. We are a Christian nation which shows respect to other religions by letting them worship freely.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let the mighty majority allow the "others" to practice their petty "fake" religions. <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&amp;q=xenophobia" rel="nofollow">Xenophobia</a>  is alive and well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105619</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105619</guid>
		<description>Swearing on the Bible is not a religous test.  It doesn&#039;t matter if you believe in the Bible or not.  It is a symbolic gesture in which you swear on the most sacred text of this particular country.  And based on our history, and the majority of our population, the Bible is the most sacred text we could find.  The Koran, or a Golden Cow, or a lucky rabbit&#039;s foot, may be sacred to you, but not most people in this country, so your oath is not going to  mean much to anybody but you.  We are a Christian nation which shows respect to other religions by letting them worship freely.  I just wish Mr. Ellison would show a little respect in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swearing on the Bible is not a religous test.  It doesn't matter if you believe in the Bible or not.  It is a symbolic gesture in which you swear on the most sacred text of this particular country.  And based on our history, and the majority of our population, the Bible is the most sacred text we could find.  The Koran, or a Golden Cow, or a lucky rabbit's foot, may be sacred to you, but not most people in this country, so your oath is not going to  mean much to anybody but you.  We are a Christian nation which shows respect to other religions by letting them worship freely.  I just wish Mr. Ellison would show a little respect in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Keibler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105592</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Keibler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105592</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my response I sent him.
&lt;blockquote&gt;You have lunatic assumptions my friend, unless you happen to be kidding. You&#039;d be surprised America isn&#039;t a theocracy and hasn’t been for the past 230 years (look it up, I&#039;m telling you the Truth). Everyone YOU know just might follow the bible as their one favorite book but it does not thusly follow to be true for all Americans. America should not be pigeonholed by a Christian extremist like you. Fear of divine punishment by the Christian God is a FALSE reason to be blindly approved trustworthy. Being sworn into public office in the American legal system should not be a religious test. Ellison’s refusal exemplifies his want and need to be honest with himself and the American people he represents. If Ellison were to swear an oath on the Christian bible it would be a lie and a religious blasphemy on his part. Imagine if you were forced by extremists to use the “The Book of Satan” or Darwin’s “Origin of Species” when being sworn into public office. How would you feel about that? Some things need to be changed and should be changed.

Just because our current election stealing president happens to be a Christian extremist doesn&#039;t imply the rest of us are Christian extremists too. Please quit making America out to be something it isn’t. You need to get out of your little dream world. Not everyone is like you. Discover how diverse America really is! Wake up!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's my response I sent him.</p>
<blockquote><p>You have lunatic assumptions my friend, unless you happen to be kidding. You'd be surprised America isn't a theocracy and hasn&rsquo;t been for the past 230 years (look it up, I'm telling you the Truth). Everyone YOU know just might follow the bible as their one favorite book but it does not thusly follow to be true for all Americans. America should not be pigeonholed by a Christian extremist like you. Fear of divine punishment by the Christian God is a FALSE reason to be blindly approved trustworthy. Being sworn into public office in the American legal system should not be a religious test. Ellison&rsquo;s refusal exemplifies his want and need to be honest with himself and the American people he represents. If Ellison were to swear an oath on the Christian bible it would be a lie and a religious blasphemy on his part. Imagine if you were forced by extremists to use the “The Book of Satan” or Darwin&rsquo;s “Origin of Species” when being sworn into public office. How would you feel about that? Some things need to be changed and should be changed.</p>
<p>Just because our current election stealing president happens to be a Christian extremist doesn't imply the rest of us are Christian extremists too. Please quit making America out to be something it isn&rsquo;t. You need to get out of your little dream world. Not everyone is like you. Discover how diverse America really is! Wake up!
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joep de Koning</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105563</link>
		<dc:creator>Joep de Koning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105563</guid>
		<description>America&#039;s first Muslim (from Morocco) had a farm on Manhattan in the 1630’s. Freedom of religion was the basis of American pluralism since the very first settlers arrived on Governors Island in 1624.  The specific instructions they received constituted the legal-cultural foundation of this nation, well before 1791, as can be seen on www.TolerancePark.org. We hope that you will study that site in order to understand what our nation is all about. J. de Koning &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tolerancepark.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America's first Muslim (from Morocco) had a farm on Manhattan in the 1630&rsquo;s. Freedom of religion was the basis of American pluralism since the very first settlers arrived on Governors Island in 1624.  The specific instructions they received constituted the legal-cultural foundation of this nation, well before 1791, as can be seen on <a href="http://www.TolerancePark.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.TolerancePark.org</a>. We hope that you will study that site in order to understand what our nation is all about. J. de Koning <a href="http://www.tolerancepark.org" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105552</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105552</guid>
		<description>Article VI - &#039;nough said.

Look it up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article VI - 'nough said.</p>
<p>Look it up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105530</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105530</guid>
		<description>The way that I see this, I am actually more comfortable with him and his Quran. Sure the Bible can serve the purpose, but the Quran will be held more sacred in his heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way that I see this, I am actually more comfortable with him and his Quran. Sure the Bible can serve the purpose, but the Quran will be held more sacred in his heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mensa Barbie Welcomes You</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mensa Barbie Welcomes You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105512</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;An Oath to Our Nation......&lt;/strong&gt;

We wouldn&#039;t need to know about the CAIR lawyer&#039;s religious preference, if he wasn&#039;t intending to fulfill their governmental court cases. It&#039;s not &quot;which book&quot;, it&#039;s the OATH which commits one to our Nation....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>An Oath to Our Nation......</strong></p>
<p>We wouldn't need to know about the CAIR lawyer's religious preference, if he wasn't intending to fulfill their governmental court cases. It's not "which book", it's the OATH which commits one to our Nation....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swearing on the Book [ Tempus Fugit &#124; TxFx.net ]</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/comment-page-1/#comment-105478</link>
		<dc:creator>Swearing on the Book [ Tempus Fugit &#124; TxFx.net ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/keith_ellison_wants_to_take_constitutional_oath_on_koran_not_bible/#comment-105478</guid>
		<description>[...] James Joyner wonders what happened to the First Amendment and Article VI of the constitution. Perhaps Mr. Prager wasn&#8217;t aware of these silly restrictions on government-mandated religion. Ellison&#8217;s doing so will embolden Islamic extremists and make new ones, as Islamists, rightly or wrongly, see the first sign of the realization of their greatest goal &#8212; the Islamicization of America. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Joyner wonders what happened to the First Amendment and Article VI of the constitution. Perhaps Mr. Prager wasn&#8217;t aware of these silly restrictions on government-mandated religion. Ellison&#8217;s doing so will embolden Islamic extremists and make new ones, as Islamists, rightly or wrongly, see the first sign of the realization of their greatest goal &#8212; the Islamicization of America. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
