working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Kingston Amendment on Minutemen Protection

Rep. Jack Kingston has proposed legislation that “would prevent any federal funds designated for the Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Customs and Border Patrol) to be used to tip off foreign governments about the location of organizations operating near the U.S./Mexico border, like the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps. Tipping off foreign governments about the location of a civilian militia could threaten the safety of civilians.” So he says in an email send out to bloggers.

AMENDMENT TO H. R. 5441, AS REPORTED

(Homeland Security Appropriations, 2007)

Page 62, after line 17, insert the following:

SEC. 537. None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to provide a foreign government information relating to the activities of Non-Integrated Surveillance Intelligence System, as defined by DHS OIG–06–15, operating along the international border between Mexico and the states of California, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona, unless required by international treaty.

Since it’s unlikely we would be tipping off, say, the Swedish government about the activities of vigilante groups on the Mexican border, the vagueness of the amendment’s wording is odd. The real question is why we’re simultaneously tipping off the Mexicans and yet allowing these groups to operate as quasi-official Border Patrol agents.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

While I disagree strongly with the actions of the Minutemen, et al, I don't see any justification to bar them from what they're doing unless they actively violate the law or endanger legitimate DHS/Border Patrol activites.

But you're right that this is very oddly worded... it appears to only enjoin DHS from handing out info, but not any other agency

Posted by legion | May 25, 2006 | 02:31 pm | Permalink
 

I thought the border patrol justification for informing the Mexican government was that they were required to from a treaty. If so, this would change absolutely nothing.

You obviously missed the memo that Mexico was about to be annexed by Venezuela, so the wording was meant to apply to either the current government or the new peoples republic government (this is snark for those a bit dense).

Posted by yetanotherjohn | May 25, 2006 | 02:55 pm | Permalink
 

I guess the key here is what is the definition of "Non-Integrated Surveillance Intelligence System?" Somehow I'm not sure that means the Minuteman.

Posted by DC Loser | May 25, 2006 | 03:11 pm | Permalink
 

How about:

Who is responsible for the tipping, and why do they still have a job?

Posted by LJD | May 25, 2006 | 03:34 pm | Permalink
 

Its better to be all inclusive. Now we can prosecute any government official who wants to help the invaders from any country.

Posted by RA | May 25, 2006 | 04:05 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.